Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 03-16-2013, 12:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
The crush washer is in there. What happens if you tighten it past the tolerance and then loosen it again?

I did not know it was available separately for a low price.

__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-16-2013, 01:19 AM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
The crush washer is in there. What happens if you tighten it past the tolerance and then loosen it again?

I did not know it was available separately for a low price.
Replace the crush sleeve and start again.


.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-16-2013, 09:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
Remove brake disc (caliper etc).

Clamp a magnetic base to the side of the trailing arm (I assume you don't have aluminium ones fitted!). If this doesn't work then get something big and heavy that won't move {tool kit?} and position it at a suitable distance from the hub so that you can...

...Position your clock gauge / DTI so that the probe will run on the surface of the hub. Turn hub by hand and watch how far that little needle spins. As it isn't a really smooth machined surface you will get some variation in needle output (?!).
Done. Maximum variation .006 inch. What measurement constitutes "ok"?

Quote:
If the hub is OK then check to make sure that the bearing clearance is still good => pull hub towards you and away from you - in and out towards and away from the differential.
Less than .001 inch. Too tight. It wasn't before

Quote:
If that is OK put the disk brake back on and repeat the test above.

Alternatively you might find it easier to check run out on the end of the hub - that would be checking for out of roundness in a vertical direction instead of lateral direction.

Runout check - YouTube
Maximum variation .010, but almost all of that appears to be from some small nicks in the surface where the dial indicator was making contact. On the smooth parts is was more like .001 inch variation.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-16-2013, 09:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
I also tried putting some lug bolts in without the wheel in place. I found you can put them in near the top without interfering with any parking brake components. Same as with the wheel-easy to turn when just snug, much harder once tightened. I noticed when I released the torque on the bolts that the lower part of the rotor moved slightly away from the hub, while the top part didn't. This led me to believe that I do have the hub in crooked, which probably also means bearing races still not fully seated. I got out the BFH and gave the hub a few good whacks in the right direction. I found the bearing end play was suddenly nearly within spec, and when I installed the wheel, I found it still harder to turn than it should be, but much less bad than before. I will be taking it for a test ride shortly to see how hot that rotor gets. I think it may be good enough now to get me to work and back when it rains next week. I know I should pull the thing apart, change crush washers, and put it back together, but that will have to wait until next weekend at the earliest.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-16-2013, 11:32 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
I also tried putting some lug bolts in without the wheel in place. I found you can put them in near the top without interfering with any parking brake components. Same as with the wheel-easy to turn when just snug, much harder once tightened. I noticed when I released the torque on the bolts that the lower part of the rotor moved slightly away from the hub, while the top part didn't. This led me to believe that I do have the hub in crooked, which probably also means bearing races still not fully seated. I got out the BFH and gave the hub a few good whacks in the right direction. I found the bearing end play was suddenly nearly within spec, and when I installed the wheel, I found it still harder to turn than it should be, but much less bad than before. I will be taking it for a test ride shortly to see how hot that rotor gets. I think it may be good enough now to get me to work and back when it rains next week. I know I should pull the thing apart, change crush washers, and put it back together, but that will have to wait until next weekend at the earliest.
You have:
#1. The rotor is not on the mount - alignment PIN = cocked on the hub.
#2. Received - installed the wrong brake pads = too thick.
#3. Received - installed the wrong rotors
#4. Seized piston failing to fully seat = rebuild or replace caliper.


.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-17-2013, 12:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by whunter View Post
You have:
#1. The rotor is not on the mount - alignment PIN = cocked on the hub.
#2. Received - installed the wrong brake pads = too thick.
#3. Received - installed the wrong rotors
#4. Seized piston failing to fully seat = rebuild or replace caliper.


.
Not #1 as I am aware of that pin and the hole in the rotor that it goes in.
If #2 how come I didn't have any problems from the time of their installation in 2005 until now?
With #3 I've had an identical issue while using the old rotor from 2005 as well as a new one. The old one worked fine for 7+ years.

That leaves #4 as appearing fairly likely, but it seems suspicious to me that the issue pops up simultaneously with a bearing change.

I'm thinking about swapping calipers side to side to see if the issue follows the caliper. That would put the bleed screws in the wrong place, so I don't know if I'd be able to bleed them satisfactorily.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-17-2013, 01:38 AM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
Not #1 as I am aware of that pin and the hole in the rotor that it goes in.
If #2 how come I didn't have any problems from the time of their installation in 2005 until now?
With #3 I've had an identical issue while using the old rotor from 2005 as well as a new one. The old one worked fine for 7+ years.

That leaves #4 as appearing fairly likely, but it seems suspicious to me that the issue pops up simultaneously with a bearing change.

I'm thinking about swapping calipers side to side to see if the issue follows the caliper. That would put the bleed screws in the wrong place, so I don't know if I'd be able to bleed them satisfactorily.
You can't swap the rear calipers from side to side.

It puts the air bleed screw on the bottom.

I rebuild all of my calipers every 4 - 6 years.

.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-17-2013, 02:44 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
I also tried putting some lug bolts in without the wheel in place. I found you can put them in near the top without interfering with any parking brake components. Same as with the wheel-easy to turn when just snug, much harder once tightened. I noticed when I released the torque on the bolts that the lower part of the rotor moved slightly away from the hub, while the top part didn't. This led me to believe that I do have the hub in crooked, which probably also means bearing races still not fully seated. I got out the BFH and gave the hub a few good whacks in the right direction. I found the bearing end play was suddenly nearly within spec, and when I installed the wheel, I found it still harder to turn than it should be, but much less bad than before. I will be taking it for a test ride shortly to see how hot that rotor gets. I think it may be good enough now to get me to work and back when it rains next week. I know I should pull the thing apart, change crush washers, and put it back together, but that will have to wait until next weekend at the earliest.
The "run out" measurements that you made indicated that the hub was running true - well as true as you could expect when making measurements on rough surfaces. That was good.

However, now you've been having a bit of hammer time I think the last bit I've highlighted seems to be the best idea. Rewind and start again.

Do you think that there's a possibility that some how the hub was positioned too far into the trailing arm and so the position of the brake disc is wrong for the position of the caliper? If so this would mean the bearings are shot / wrong...

...in your first post you talk about the bearing seats / bearing cups not being seated properly - could this have been the problem all along?
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-17-2013, 02:58 AM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
The "run out" measurements that you made indicated that the hub was running true - well as true as you could expect when making measurements on rough surfaces. That was good.

However, now you've been having a bit of hammer time I think the last bit I've highlighted seems to be the best idea. Rewind and start again.

Do you think that there's a possibility that some how the hub was positioned too far into the trailing arm and so the position of the brake disc is wrong for the position of the caliper? If so this would mean the bearings are shot / wrong...

...in your first post you talk about the bearing seats / bearing cups not being seated properly - could this have been the problem all along?
Yes, it is possible.
The Hub would be out of alignment with the caliper center point.

.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-26-2013, 05:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
Last week I realized I had to fly out on orders for a long weekend of playing Navy. I messed around with that wheel assembly for a bit. The crush spacer is definitely done. It managed to make it the 29 miles to the airport and then back without getting too hot or setting itself on fire. New crush spacers (3 of them just in case) ordered just now. Unfortunately the expected ship date is 5 Apr.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:17 AM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
Last week I realized I had to fly out on orders for a long weekend of playing Navy. I messed around with that wheel assembly for a bit. The crush spacer is definitely done. It managed to make it the 29 miles to the airport and then back without getting too hot or setting itself on fire. New crush spacers (3 of them just in case) ordered just now. Unfortunately the expected ship date is 5 Apr.
The bearings will be toast.

.

__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page