![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions wanter 190D 2.2
I am looking at a 190D 2.2 for sale,I was wondering if anyone has a experiences with these cars
Wayne
__________________
Wayne Jockers 1992 300D |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Well obviously I do.
![]()
__________________
1984 190D 2.2 Auto 220k 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport 70K 2004 Lexus RX-330 ??K 2005 Chrylser Crossfire LTD 6K Play guitar? Go to www.cyberfret.com for free online lessons! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
2.2 vs 2.5?
What are the pros and cons of the 2.2L and the 2.5L versions?
I am thinking I would like a later 2.5L manual, but they're as rare as hens teeth.
__________________
Michael LaFleur '05 E320 CDI - 86,000 miles '86 300SDL - 360,000 miles '85 300SD - 150,000 miles (sold) '89 190D - 120,000 miles (sold) '85 300SD - 317,000 miles (sold) '98 ML320 - 270,000 miles (sold) '75 300D - 170,000 miles (sold) '83 Harley Davidson FLTC (Broken again) :-( '61 Plymouth Valiant - 60k mikes 2004 Papillon (Oliver) 2005 Tzitzu (Griffon) 2009 Welsh Corgi (Buba) ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Too much experience with one
I am probably the wrong person to ask.
I LOVE THE CAR. I have owned just such a car for over 13 years. The 2.2 is great. I do think that when it is mated to a manual it is quite fun to drive (and I have owned faster cars, 911 Carrera). I agree that a 2.5 manual is more fun, but the 2.2 manual is better than either a 2.2 or 2.5 auto, and, I think, even better than a 2.5 turbo (automatic only). I still get 35 mpg routinely, and I have gotten as high as 44 with the car even with 300kmi on the original engine. I have gotten over 220kmi on the second clutch. I have done almost (99%) of the work on the car, so I can talk to you about it in greater detail that I would care to type. Feel free to contact me directly at jjovanovic@factor-ip.com, and I can tell you all you want to know.
__________________
Jovan '84 (11/83) 190D 2.2 5-Speed; Silver/Blue; Motor No. 00354, 402k mi (340+kmi mine) '89 Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe; Black/Black; 53kmi '05 BMW 530i 6-Speed; 302kmi '19 Range Rover; 30kmi |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
When I was first looking at diesels, I got very excited by this car. The 2.2 5-speed may not be that fast, but the milage is compareable to a new VW TDI! This is defineately gonna be my next car. I am used to driving smaller cars (Saab, Subaru, Toyota) so my 300TD feels like a tank. A safe tank, but still a tank. I have always thought small sedans were the best cars. The standards get the best milage by far, but the 2.5 turbo from 87 is the fastest. I guess it depends what you are really looking for. Either way, go for it!
__________________
Sean Roland 2004 Saab 9-5 AERO 138k (for sale) 2000 VW Jetta GLS TDI 215k (sold) 1999 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 - 132k (sold) 1999 Saab 9-3se -- 84k (sold) 1986 MB 190e 2.3 16v -- 221K (sold) 1985 MB 190e 2.3 16v euro -- 145k (junked) 1992 Saab 9000t 5sp. -- 142k (sold) 1994 Subaru Legacy -- 264K (sold) 1998 Audi A4 1.8TQ -- 102k (sold) 1983 MB 240D stick -- 160k (sold) 1988 Saab 900SPG -- 156K (sold) 1983 MB 300D -- 270K project or parts (sold) 1986 MB 280SE Euro stick -- 150K (sold) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Here's your big chance!
Ken300D |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm assuming the 190D's are as reliable as the 300D's, but how about parts availability? Are parts easier to come by, more difficult, or what? Also, are the heads cast-iron or aluminum?
I'm starting to seriously think that, for my use for the car (freeway commuter), a 190D would be better for me than a 300D...especially 'cause you can get a 5sp with the 190D ![]() Thanks!
__________________
2001 VW Jetta TDI, 5 speed, daily driver 1991 Ford F-350, work in progress 1984 Ford F-250 4x4, 6.9l turbo diesel, 5 speed manual Previous oilburners: 1980 IH Scout, 1984 E-350, 1985 M-B 300D, 1979 M-B 300SD, 1983 M-B 300D Spark-free since 1999 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
#9
|
||||
|
||||
The car is basically a scaled down 300 (124). The 190 (201) came out in 1982 (europe) whereas the 124 came out in 1985 (europe). As such, the 124 was a bit more refined and updated; the 201 was the first of the "generation." Having owned one for over a decade, and having owned 123's, 124's and 126's, I believe that the 123 adn 126 cars are more bullet proof. On the other hand, the 124 and 201 have updated systems and are generally more comfortable and efficient cars.
It is true that these cars have the 601-603 engine series. The 4 is the 601, and is generally thought to be the least durable of the bunch. The best one is thought to be the 5 cylinder 602. With that being said, I have a 601 with 324,000 miles that gets 80 miles a day at ~ 75-90 mph. It has a fully original engine. It is a great car.
__________________
Jovan '84 (11/83) 190D 2.2 5-Speed; Silver/Blue; Motor No. 00354, 402k mi (340+kmi mine) '89 Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe; Black/Black; 53kmi '05 BMW 530i 6-Speed; 302kmi '19 Range Rover; 30kmi |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
These cars had the 603 engine as well? I thought they only did the 4, the 5, and the 5 turbo in the 201 chassis.
__________________
1984 190D 2.2 Auto 220k 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport 70K 2004 Lexus RX-330 ??K 2005 Chrylser Crossfire LTD 6K Play guitar? Go to www.cyberfret.com for free online lessons! |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
You saying Gwagon reminded me... Does mercedes not sell the new CDIs because of the US's current pollution control? I am sorry that they stopped selling diesel mercedes in the US. I know that VW has the TDIs over here, my sister looked at one (she got the 1.8T because she drove my car ONCE and hates diesel... too slow for her)...
__________________
1984 190D 2.2 Auto 220k 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport 70K 2004 Lexus RX-330 ??K 2005 Chrylser Crossfire LTD 6K Play guitar? Go to www.cyberfret.com for free online lessons! |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
You guys are right there are no 603 190's. My reference was to the engine line in general that included 601, 602, 603 variations. The 603's appeared in the 124, 126, 201, 140 and the G wagon.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
__________________
Jovan '84 (11/83) 190D 2.2 5-Speed; Silver/Blue; Motor No. 00354, 402k mi (340+kmi mine) '89 Porsche 911 Turbo Coupe; Black/Black; 53kmi '05 BMW 530i 6-Speed; 302kmi '19 Range Rover; 30kmi |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
(you listed the 201 again!)
![]()
__________________
1984 190D 2.2 Auto 220k 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport 70K 2004 Lexus RX-330 ??K 2005 Chrylser Crossfire LTD 6K Play guitar? Go to www.cyberfret.com for free online lessons! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Do you happen to know the other three states that have adopted the CARB rules?
Ken300D |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Speaking of emissions. I believe they weren't bringing them over because out diesel is too sulphuric compared to Euro Diesel. Because of the Sulphur it'll eat away the emissions pretty quick.
BTW Bill hear about those new Emissions standards they are trying to implement in the DFW area? I think they've been using it in Houston for a little while. If so do they even car about our Diesels (I'm pretty sure I'm exempt, but you never know)
__________________
2005 Audi A4 1.8T CVT -Silver/Black "Siegfried" 1982 300D - Silver/Blue "Ralph" -For Sale: http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?p=852260 1989 VW Diesel Jetta Blue/Blue "Bodo" RIP |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 190D 2.2 5 speed | silverfishk8 | Mercedes-Benz Cars For Sale | 0 | 05-06-2003 01:06 PM |
190D 2.2 Questions | 73MB280SEL | Diesel Discussion | 3 | 11-23-2002 05:50 PM |
190D 2.2 Advice Please | Trace | Tech Help | 2 | 06-18-2002 10:34 AM |
Should I buy this '85 190D 2.2?? | bhatt | Diesel Discussion | 12 | 07-21-2000 01:21 PM |