Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-28-2006, 09:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Urbana, Missouri
Posts: 171
George?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
Patriotism is a knee-jerk emotion. That ol' George Washington was a knee-jerking kind of guy, huh?
George was a rich, white (mostly slave-holding) conservative who didn't want to pay any taxes, as were almost without exception all of the "founding father."

__________________
Rev. Dr. G. Church of the SubGenius
It doesn't take a genius
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-28-2006, 09:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdemoss01
George was a rich, white (mostly slave-holding) conservative who didn't want to pay any taxes, as were almost without exception all of the "founding father."
It would seem to be quite a stretch to call someone engaged in a revolution a "conservative."
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-28-2006, 10:33 AM
Zeitgeist's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 2,304
It's probably a stretch to call the replacement of one form of elite rule with another form of elite rule, a revolution...violent evolution, perhaps?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-28-2006, 10:42 AM
BENZ-LGB's Avatar
Strong, silent type
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdemoss01
George was a rich, white (mostly slave-holding) conservative who didn't want to pay any taxes, as were almost without exception all of the "founding father."
What brass balls George and his fellow rich whitge guys must have had.

To risk life, family, liberty and fortune, against the most powerful empire of the time...just to avoid paying taxes.

Holy s**t, I wish I had balls like his.

And then, when George was offered the "job" of King of the new nation, he turned it down.

What an impudent, rich white guy.

__________________
Current Benzes

1989 300TE "Alice"
1990 300CE "Sam Spade"
1991 300CE "Beowulf" RIP (06.1991 - 10.10.2007)
1998 E320 "Orson"
2002 C320 Wagon "Molly Fox"

Res non semper sunt quae esse videntur

My Gallery

Not in this weather!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-28-2006, 10:46 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Urbana, Missouri
Posts: 171
Excuse me?

Revolution (and revolutionaries) can be either conservative or liberal, I suppose. Reactionary revolutions are as common as liberal. Iran is a case in point. Is the French Reign of Terror liberal or conservative?

Our "founding fathers" did not want to be taxed. The only democracy they wanted was of the ruling class variety. They ran the country and wanted to continue to do so but without paying taxes and expected the govenment to protect their property: land, slaves and whatever else they owned.

Those who were of the female persuasion and those who did not own property were inelgible to vote. I wouldn't characterise that as liberal nor even revolutionary. Myths make for great storytelling.
__________________
Rev. Dr. G. Church of the SubGenius
It doesn't take a genius
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-28-2006, 10:49 AM
azimuth's Avatar
sociopathic sherpa
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 433
it obviously doesn't take a genius
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-28-2006, 12:26 PM
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeitgeist
...The United States overthrew them.

And in almost in every case, the overthrow can be traced to corporate interests...
You forgot Great Britain's Colonial goverment...

1775-1783, American Revolutionary War.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-28-2006, 01:02 PM
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by pxland
"There are no permanent allies, or permanent enemies. Only permanent interests".

I had a professor who loved this quote, don't know where he stole it from.
Here you go, from a Google search...
Quote:
"We have no eternal allies and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are perpetual and eternal and those interests it is our duty to follow."

Lord Palmerston, British Foreign Secretary, 1848
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-28-2006, 02:47 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdemoss01
George was a rich, white (mostly slave-holding) conservative who didn't want to pay any taxes, as were almost without exception all of the "founding father."
Was he nothing more than that to Geo Washington?
Are these the most important features of his life?
Any idea what became of his slaves after his death?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-28-2006, 02:51 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdemoss01
...

1. Our "founding fathers" did not want to be taxed.

2. The only democracy they wanted was of the ruling class variety.

3. They ran the country and wanted to continue to do so but without paying taxes and expected the govenment to protect their property: land, slaves and whatever else they owned.

4. Those who were of the female persuasion and those who did not own property were inelgible to vote. I wouldn't characterise that as liberal nor even revolutionary. Myths make for great storytelling.
1. A great warning to modern lawmakers.

2. The "only" thing? have you ever read, the "

3. False. They paid taxes before and after the revolution at all levels. Look it up. They resented somebody for whom they did not vote and over whom they had no power, confiscating their wealth. Ever heard the phrase, "No taxation without representation"?

4. Judging historic culture with present values is a fools judgement.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:08 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 38,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by BENZ-LGB
"BENZ-LUGGY?"

Dearest comrade:

Not desiring to see this thread closed by the mods, and being blamed by it, I chose not to respond in kind.

In my experience, however, hiding behind Jesus' robes is a sign of inttlectual cowardice. If the sandals fit, then please wear them.

Apropos to nothing, or to everything, I recently read that a lack of testosterone tends to make old men cranky and makes them act stupid.

Makes one wonder.

Now comrade, you keep it up with the personal attacks, you keep hiding behind Jesus' robes. Intellectual cowardice and intellectual dishonesty do not deserve a response.
Did I bruise your tender ego? A little more bruising is ahead for you in that dept., though I'm going to get tired of it pretty soon.

Hiding behind Jesus's robes? Dude, I'm pointing out the obvious: your writing is heavy on the personal attack angle even if you don't call me an idiot. I can only wonder if you use this same attitude w/ your family. Jesus is just another authority to quote, sort of like using precedence in a legal case. IOW, it's not just my opinion that pride and contempt are corrosive to character. There's sound precedence for that opinion.

Reading your stuff has informed me of one thing though: white trailer trash on Jerry Springer ain't got a monopoly on hillbilly temper tantrums.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Urbana, Missouri
Posts: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
1. A great warning to modern lawmakers.

2. The "only" thing? have you ever read, the "

3. False. They paid taxes before and after the revolution at all levels. Look it up. They resented somebody for whom they did not vote and over whom they had no power, confiscating their wealth. Ever heard the phrase, "No taxation without representation"?

4. Judging historic culture with present values is a fools judgement.
Taxes of that time was paid on legal documents and on imported goods, luxury items, manufactured good, etc. as the colonies had no manufacturing since their ecomomy was primarily based upon raw materiall exports. I have looked it up and have written about it.

History is only judged by present day values. I (nor other historians) would judge Nazi genocide to be a fantastic reponse to Europe's ehtnic issues.

However, slaveholding was an enlightenment for the African population. Through such slavery they were taught Christian values, "civilized" behavior, and an appreciation for all things American. That is judging history by other than present values.
__________________
Rev. Dr. G. Church of the SubGenius
It doesn't take a genius
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:12 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 38,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
Patriotism is a knee-jerk emotion. That ol' George Washington was a knee-jerking kind of guy, huh?
Many forms and manifestations of patriotism. It can be a very good thing. I admire Washington for many reasons.

I'm a little less impressed with guys who beat the crap out of each other based on their high school alma mater losing and then dissed in the big game. Happens all the time. A crude variant of patriotism.

Did you ever see the footage of crowds in early 40s Japan cheering as they sent their young men off into glorious battle? Tell me those folks weren't feeling strong patriotism. Was the force of that channeled wisely?
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K

Last edited by cmac2012; 04-28-2006 at 03:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:37 PM
BENZ-LGB's Avatar
Strong, silent type
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Did I bruise your tender ego? A little more bruising is ahead for you in that dept., though I'm going to get tired of it pretty soon.
Yep, the study about testosterone deficiency in old men causing crankiness and lapses in judgment was right after all.

Moving on....

On the issue of the Founding Fathers, they chose to tax themselves. But Botnst has already pointed this out, so no need to elaborate.

"Female persuasion?" I don't think that anyone can be persuaded to be a female, although some people have changed their gender. I understand that gender bending is a favored pastime among some residents of some parts of California.

I agree with you gdemoss01, there was a certain level of hypocrisy at play with the Founding Fathers. To exclude people of color and women was, to put it mildly, a major oversight. They could've gone further than they did, but instead chose not to. That's a shame, because a lot of the problems that we still have today could have been eliminated way back then.

In their defense, I would offer the following. Given the historical context of their efforts, however, I would say that they went pretty far. No other society of the time gave women equal rights. Matriarchal societies, such as those found among certain Native-American groups were thought of as primitive. It is interesting that in ancient Greece, women had no rights. In Roman times, however, women had far more legal rights than women had previoulsy enjoyed.

Many religions, Christian and otherwise, give women no rights whatsoever. I believe that in present day Saudi Arabia women cannot even get a driver's license. Incidentally, my wife is a far better driver than I am--she can drive her Yukon like it was a Miata. Yet in SA she couldn't even hold a driver's license. Does not seem fair.

Also don't forget that generations later, the men who came after the Founding Fathers found inspiration in the words the FF wrote in order to extend the same rights to all men and women, regardless of race. So give them credit where credit is due.

Still, you ar right, they did not go far enough.

Further on the subject of patriotism. The thought that the actions of bands of drunken high school thugs (or drunken English soccer fans for that matter) is on the same level as the kind of patriotism that makes men and women risk life and limb, in order to fight for an ideal is not just plain ... (what's the word that I am searching for here???) oh yes ... stupid, but it also worthy of (what's that other word that I am searching for here???) oh yes...contempt.
__________________
Current Benzes

1989 300TE "Alice"
1990 300CE "Sam Spade"
1991 300CE "Beowulf" RIP (06.1991 - 10.10.2007)
1998 E320 "Orson"
2002 C320 Wagon "Molly Fox"

Res non semper sunt quae esse videntur

My Gallery

Not in this weather!
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:44 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 38,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by BENZ-LGB
Yep, the study about testosterone deficiency in old men causing crankiness and lapses in judgment was right after all.
So you're going to begin testosterone therapy soon?


__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page