PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   It's heeeeeerrrreeeee (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=175760)

MedMech 01-09-2007 06:02 PM

It's heeeeeerrrreeeee
 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,242483,00.html

Zeus 01-09-2007 08:44 PM

Soon to be followed by the iPhone Nano, then the iPhone Neuro, which will be a tiny implant inserted into one's cochlea.

The real question is, when to jump on the wagon? :D

MedMech 01-09-2007 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus (Post 1382583)
Soon to be followed by the iPhone Nano, then the iPhone Neuro, which will be a tiny implant inserted into one's cochlea.

The real question is, when to jump on the wagon? :D

It is supposed to be a "multi year" contract with Cingular............since Cingular sucks around here I will not have one unless it can be unlocked like my Blackberry.

TheDon 01-09-2007 09:15 PM

Cingular has it.. sweeeet im soo upgrading
Its out in June. 600$ for the 8 gig model... gives me time to save.

The Zune is DEAD now!!!!!

GottaDiesel 01-09-2007 09:43 PM

Yeah I gotta say, Zune is just WAY too late. It looks nice, but the market it super saturated.

mikemover 01-09-2007 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MedMech (Post 1382431)

I've been waiting for that gadget for a LOOOONG time! I've been with Cingular since '99, and I'll be due for an "upgrade" by June!!!! :D

Mike

kknudson 01-09-2007 11:41 PM

OK, someone explain to me the big deal.

I've had my current iPaq phone for over a year, and an earlier one for 4 before that.

I have a phone, with full internet, email, contacts, word, excel, games AND music all in one device.

The email is outlook, and connects to my corporate (personal) exchange server.

Storage has been limited, but thats changing quickly with 8 gig SD cards.
Gee my one gig card only holds 100 or so albums (OK, I removed a few songs from each, the ones I didn't want anyhow)

So I've had everything for 5 years.

And while it does have a keyboard, it's touchscreen. The phone dialer is touch screen only !!!!


Yes, it's Windows Mobile.



PS any comments about virus's vs Apple remember this is MOAB
As Coined by Apple Loyalists !!!

That is "Month Of Apple Bugs", they have been reporting Holes in the OS faster than Apple can fix them(In fact over half the temporary patches are not from Apple).
Not even counting things like the current Adobe hole, affects ALL OSs.


I have nothing against Macs, use what you like best.
But for corporate stuff, Sorry Windows is it FOR NOW.

I have also stated if Jobs gets smart and quits trying to control the hardware and just sell the OS on any Intel hardware, for the first time in years there is an OS that could scare Msft.

MedMech 01-09-2007 11:44 PM

The iphone goes far beyond the iPaq.

kknudson 01-09-2007 11:58 PM

Gee, no offense, but black is darker than white.

Goes far beyond, how ..................

Honus 01-09-2007 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kknudson (Post 1382781)
...PS any comments about virus's vs Apple remember this is MOAB
As Coined by Apple Loyalists !!!

That is "Month Of Apple Bugs", they have been reporting Holes in the OS faster than Apple can fix them(In fact over half the temporary patches are not from Apple)...

Maybe I am missing the point of this MOAB thing, but these flaws they are finding in OS X seem pretty picky to me, especially when compared to the endless flaws in Microsoft products.

I don't know anything about the Zune, but I almost felt sorry for its designers on the day it came out. The news people reporting on it just tore it to ribbons. Microsoft has single-handedly refuted the saying, "Build a better mouse trap and customers will beat a path to your door." That rule now says, "Build a dominant technology and customers will have no choice but to come to your door."

kknudson 01-10-2007 12:30 AM

Just stated the MOAB thing, because up here anytime some says Windows there are 4 "Get a Mac" posts.
I just get sick of the zealots, no offense to them.



Look at it logically, the MAC OS is based on UNIX.
300% of the reason UNIX/LINUX has never made inroads on the desktop is zealots.

My (insert flavor) is better than your (insert flavor).
Insert Flavor = BSD, ATT, SUN, AIX, ... or Linux Redhat, Unbutu ....

IF 25 years ago these guys had gotten together and standardized them Bill Gates would probably be flippin burgers.
None of them are compatible, each is unique and different (the Linux's have gotten better, BUT haven't solved the issue).
I have worked on most over the years(I've been in the industry, hard to believe, almost 40 years and I'm just over 50. I was programming before I could drive, common today, not so in the late 60s), the consistency of Windows is what made it.

Believe me I can give you some choice words about Windows and it's FUs.
And a BE UT that affect Windows Mobile !!!!

And regarding the endless flaws in Windows, many are pretty picky too.
The hole can only be exploited under some pretty complex situations.
But you only see "7 patches released this week". Read the details.

Funny, I have 7 computers here. Hardware is my biggest headache.
Hack me, yea right !!!

And my brothers Mac has given him some grief !!


Agree Zune is ???

Although the new Sansa from SanDisk has some interesting features, a bit clunky though.

Still I've had, and used, a phone with an MP3 player for 5 years.

So other than it comes from God Steve vs. the Devil Bill ....

truckinik 01-10-2007 12:54 AM

Hey knudson,
My sentiments exactly,to all you've said,and I couldn't have said it better myself.I would have sounded like an idiot.but you delivered well.

kknudson 01-10-2007 01:04 AM

Thanks truckinik.

I've become real jaded on my industry, seen it ruined over the years.

Although it was fun almost 30 years ago, working at a consulting firm.
There were a bunch of us doing heavy Unix internal stuff for several different flavors.

Company get togethers were a riot when the ATT (my team), the AIX, and the Berkley groups got together.

If Nerds could fight - hehe

dacia 01-10-2007 04:56 AM

Excellent summary kknudson.
I am sick of Mac people's attitude, whenever someone poses a Windows question here, invariably some pretentious "genious" feels the need to offer a real helpful advice, like "Why don't you get a Mac?". Mac has its advantages, none that would me make switch over to a machine where I can't add or exchange components and or peripherals from the vendor of my choice, at my convenience. No way in hell will I be locked in with one hardware manufacturer. Screw Jobs and his business model.
A few years ago Apple almost went bankrupt because of its proprietary hardware.
I run XP/SP2 with 2g memory on a 17" Toshiba Satellite, use Firefox and have/had no problems, no viruses, worms, etc, even though it is connected to the Net 24/7.
I reboot maybe once or twice a month, it runs along just fine.

I can play MP3s, surf the net, send-receive e-mail on my 3G GMS cellphone, it has a built in Japanese-English dictionary, 2 cameras (yeah), games, etc, it is 1.4cm thick flip phone, what the hell do I need to shell out 600 bucks for? I paid $50, signed up for 2 years, I just don't see what is the earth shattering deal about that product. Here in Japan every second phone has a TV feature now, why would I ever want to watch TV on a 2" screen (or on the navigation system in my car on a 6" screen, just because I can, I guess)? Or surf the Net for that matter, utterly useless in my view. I love technology, I just don't think that phone is such a big deal as some makes it out to be. I don't need to have my entire CD collection on my phone so I can listen to it through tiny, bad speakers.

Alex

Botnst 01-10-2007 07:30 AM

Get a Mac.

B

MedMech 01-10-2007 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 1382937)
Get a Mac.

B

YIP WAYYYYYYY better!

Kuan 01-10-2007 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dacia (Post 1382873)
I am sick of Mac people's attitude, whenever someone poses a Windows question here, invariably some pretentious "genious" feels the need to offer a real helpful advice, like "Why don't you get a Mac?". Mac has its advantages, none that would me make switch over to a machine where I can't add or exchange components and or peripherals from the vendor of my choice, at my convenience. No way in hell will I be locked in with one hardware manufacturer. Screw Jobs and his business model.

Get the best of both worlds. Run Linux. You don't have to reboot for a year. Recompile your kernel while playing games.

PaulC 01-10-2007 09:34 AM

My Mac has been a flawless performer and runs all the software that I need. I have little interest in returning to Windows, which crashes more often than a 16-year-old with a Corvette.

Zeus 01-10-2007 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kknudson (Post 1382807)
Just stated the MOAB thing, because up here anytime some says Windows there are 4 "Get a Mac" posts.
I just get sick of the zealots, no offense to them.

Agreed. Lol.

I use both at work, PC and a Mac - Power Mac G5.

For day-to-day stuff, Internet, basic multimedia, etc., a Mac is awesome. Hassle-free.

However, I use mine for desktop publishing and imaging work. There are plenty of major hassles, believe me. Fonts and font management are a nightmare in OS X. Even with the updates and managers, they're still a nightmare. Different apps grab from different sources, it's a nightmare. Many clients we work with, including newspapers and magazines, still use OS 9.x and earlier versions of programs like Quark, simply to avoid this hassle. Then other clients have upgraded to say, Adobe InDesign and OS X. So you need to be able to handle both. Grrrr..

Just google 'font management' and 'OS X' for fun.

FTP support is built into OS X. Great feature! Only...you can't write back to the server. No matter what the server's permissions are set to, OS X enables all files and folders to 'read-only'. I'm presuming this is for security. Glad it's secure. Only...it's a useless feature. You need to download a third party FTP client, like Cyberduck. Sounds like...Windows? Then there's the issues with Finder not refreshing properly (fixed since Jaguar I think??) but it was annoying while it was there.

I've been running XP for a few years now and I've had ZERO hassles with it. Yes, you have to run a firewall and antivirus and keep them up to date, but that's simply the price for using the world's dominant OS. Simple as. I think many people simply do not know how to use Windows properly and/or neglect to update it and hence you get problems.

In this regard, a Mac wins hands-down. It is far easier to use 'out of the box' and for someone who doesn't want to have to constantly keep on top of their OS and enviroment, it's a no-brainer.

But all this talk of "Macs are perfect" is a little silly, IMO.

Just my $0.02.

MedMech 01-10-2007 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kuan (Post 1382946)
Get the best of both worlds. Run Linux. You don't have to reboot for a year. Recompile your kernel while playing games.

True Mac and Linux are close relatives.


I spare the security and antispyware stuff Mac is just better. The main thing I like about Mac is the booting winders takes at least 4 times the time that mac does.

mac rarely crashes
mac rarely freezes
you don't need to add some little pos software everytime you do something.

It may be small but the one of the highest points on my list is PDF is native to the OS which I use a ton of so I don't get crashes when using pdf related utilities.

On Windows phones; don't make me laugh they are all the biggest POS's available, Blackberry is the ONLY phone that is worth a crap IMO.

Plantman 01-10-2007 11:04 AM

I recently got a samsung blackjack and absoluetly love it. Don't anticipate changing anytime soon!:)

MedMech 01-10-2007 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Plantman (Post 1383091)
I recently got a samsung blackjack and absoluetly love it. Don't anticipate changing anytime soon!:)

I hear that is a good device.

Hatterasguy 01-10-2007 12:25 PM

Its cool yes, I just don't know how practical it is. I mean my currant phone can take pics and video. I only use them when I am deathly bored because they suck. For pics a digital camra is many times better. Internet access? Yeah I guess I could do that as well but I don't want to spend the extra $5 a month. What for? Check email online maybe, check MLS online ok I could see that. Still for the one or two times I actualy use it $60 a year?

I don't know I just think its a toy, a cool toy yes. I'm not trading in the Razor anytime soon.

Plantman 01-10-2007 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MedMech (Post 1383095)
I hear that is a good device.

Excellent. Has a bunch of toys that I have not had the time to tinker with, but the reception is great, the features are easy to use, the internet is wonderful for a mobile device and it fits anywhere.

I like it so much I actually went out and bought a plastic pda screen protector to preserve it.

:)

Now that we are on the subject of mobile phones, I wanna get a real goo dbluetooth earpiece that I won't have to replace every two months.

Suggestions?

TheDon 01-10-2007 02:48 PM

The only issues with this phone will be

Service with cingular (I have had nothing but good service)
The data plan (hopefully they offer a flat rate for unlimited data like tmobile)
The price ( I am tempted for the 8 gig model but I paid 250$ for 30 gigs.. so a wait for a larger one may be in order)


I do hope they use this new touch screen technology on the next generation iPod. It has been a long wait for this technology and it will pay off. Apple is now king of the DAP world.

www.ilounge.com/forums - great ipod related forum (member since 2002)

Mistress 01-10-2007 02:50 PM

There stock went up.....

Dee8go 01-10-2007 02:56 PM

I was pretty pumped up about the I Phone until I saw their deal was exclusive with Cingular. I'm a loyal Sprint customer. If they ever include Sprint as a partner, I'm going to be on it like a big dog!

Zeus 01-10-2007 03:23 PM

I'm happy enough with my Razor as well, but the iPhone is pretty damn cool!

The only problem with these tech gadgets is that their coolness factor lasts about a month, until the NEWER and even COOLER device is released. Total swindle. All these manufacturers should have to incorporate a trade-in and recycle program to deal with all the instantly obsolete devices they create.

What I love about the Razor most is the mini-USB hookup. Brilliant and long-overdue feature. So I can charge the phone right off my PC as I work, and you can dump data, media, etc. to and from your PC easily onto the phone.

Dee8go 01-10-2007 03:37 PM

I still like my Treo, but it won't hot sync to my computer anymore. The day it requires a hard reset, I'll be screwed. I figure that Apple's phone will work even better tha Palm's does. I think things like the I Pod have driven people back into Apple computers. I know I'll never buy another Windows POS again.

Mistress 01-10-2007 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dee8go (Post 1383379)
I was pretty pumped up about the I Phone until I saw their deal was exclusive with Cingular. I'm a loyal Sprint customer. If they ever include Sprint as a partner, I'm going to be on it like a big dog!

Oh, you'll have that gadget by years end I'd put my Chihuaua on it.

Dee8go 01-10-2007 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mistress (Post 1383436)
Oh, you'll have that gadget by years end I'd put my Chihuaua onit.

Care to take a drive down to the Gadgeteria with me, Mistress?

PaulC 01-10-2007 04:50 PM

Compared to my Razr, this thing looks like a brick. I don't know if I could go back to 1991-size pocket cellphones after living with StarTacs and Razrs for the better part of a decade.

Pricey little devil too. I fondly recall when I was the first on the block with a deluxe analog StarTac, complete with all accessories, for the bargain price of $699. Six months later, you could buy two for that price.

kknudson 01-10-2007 05:00 PM

Well I like my iPaq Windows Mobile phone.

No real complaints.

Cingular does have an unlimited data plan, but it is pricey (40/month I think).

Finally, My XP system has been flawless for ages now.
Video driver causes some minor issue's, but a reboot cures that.
I have 2 NVidia cards, with 4 monitors. Soon to be 3 cards and 6 monitors, try that with a Mac.

2meg ram, and run Virtual PC and/or VMWare at various times.
I'll have 4 or five XP machines running at once, sometimes a Linux image or two as well.

I do abuse my workstation, installing, testing, and uninstalling a lot of software. So I do some testing in a VM, neat technology.
Yet I don't have any issue's, and don't spend a lot of time doing Msft updates.

TheDon 01-10-2007 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kknudson (Post 1383549)
Well I like my iPaq Windows Mobile phone.

No real complaints.

Cingular does have an unlimited data plan, but it is pricey (40/month I think).

40$ sounds decent to me. I wonder how many minutes they would include 500 is enough for me. That and unlimited texting would rock.

MedMech 01-10-2007 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Plantman (Post 1383189)

Now that we are on the subject of mobile phones, I wanna get a real goo dbluetooth earpiece that I won't have to replace every two months.

Suggestions?

I have been using the latest greatest Moto and like it. YMMV

check out www.howardforums.com

Hatterasguy 01-10-2007 11:08 PM

The nice thing about the Razzor is it fits so nicely in my pocket. I hate those belt clips for the phones, actualy thats why I bought a Razzor!

LaRondo 01-11-2007 06:05 AM

Cisco sues Apple over use of iPhone name

AP [ THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2007 01:11:19 PM]

SAN FRANCISCO: Apple Inc's much-ballyhooed iPhone was unveiled this week after 30 months and millions of dollars in top-secret development. But the sleek new iPod-cellular phone combination could wind up costing the company a lot more.

Cisco Systems Inc., the world's largest networking equipment maker, sued Apple in San Francisco federal court on Wednesday, claiming that Apple's iPhone violates its trademark.

Cisco is asking the court to forbid Apple from using the name "iPhone," which Cisco has held a trademark on since 2000 and used to brand a line of its own Internet-enabled phones that began shipping last spring and officially launched three weeks ago.

Cisco said Apple approached the company several years ago seeking to use the name, and the two Silicon Valley tech giants have been negotiating ever since to hammer out a licensing agreement.

But Cisco said the talks broke down just hours before Apple's chief executive, Steve Jobs, took to the stage Tuesday at the annual Macworld Conference and Expo to introduce the multimedia device.

Apple's iPhone is a touch-screen-controlled cellphone device that plays music, surfs the Web and delivers voicemail and e-mail. The product still needs FCC approval.

While Jobs was holding court in front of thousands of Apple devotees, Cisco had given Apple lawyers until the end of the business day to finalize the contract.

The deadline came and went, and Cisco filed the lawsuit Wednesday seeking injunctive relief to prevent Apple from copying Cisco's iPhone trademark.

"We certainly expected that since they had gone ahead and announced a product without receiving permission to use the brand, that meant that the negotiation was concluded," said Mark Chandler, Cisco senior vice president and general counsel.

Apple argues it's entitled to use the name iPhone because the products are materially different.

Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris called Cisco's lawsuit "silly" and said there are already several other companies using the name iPhone for products like Cisco's that use the increasingly popular Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP.

"We believe that Cisco's US trademark registration is tenuous at best," she said. "Apple's the first company to use the iPhone name for a cell phone. And if Cisco wants to challenge us on it, we're very confident we will prevail."

Cisco executives argue that, despite the current dissimilarities between the Cisco and Apple iPhone, both phones could take on new features or work on different networks than they do today.

Erik Suppiger, networking specialist at Pacific Growth Equities, said that argument is sound in an era of "convergence," when the Internet is increasingly used as a telephone network.

"I'd envision that Cisco would be inclined to add cellular functionality to its iPhone. I would not be surprised to see them add additional memory for supporting whatever media functions you might want, either — they'd be logical extensions," Suppiger said. "The phones may not overlap right now, but they would over the foreseeable future."

The lawsuit may be more than just a semantic scuffle. Cisco has been on an aggressive acquisition binge in the past year, and CEO John Chambers has been ambitious about building the company's brand name and producing more consumer electronics — not just the esoteric networking gear that chief information officers purchased at great expense.

The lawsuit could be an attempt to embroil Apple into a legal morass because Cisco is set on developing a competing product, said Eve Griliches, program manager at Framingham, Mass.-based research firm IDC.

"Cisco is a very, very smart company, and anything they can do to slow Apple out of the gate might give them an advantage at the negotiating table," Griliches said. "Chances are both companies knew this lawsuit was going to happen — the real question is, what's really behind it?"

But not everyone agrees that the lawsuit is strategic or even productive for Cisco, the most richly valued company in Silicon Valley with a market capitalization of more than $174 billion.

"Bottom line is that you'd think Cisco had a better use of its time and money than suing Apple over a word," said Samuel Wilson, analyst at JMP Securities.

Before the lawsuit was announced, Apple's shares closed up $4.43 to $97 during regular trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Apple shares fell 40 cents to $96.60 in after-hours trading.

Cisco's shares closed up 21 cents to $28.68 on the Nasdaq Stock Market. In after-hours trading, Cisco shares gained 9 cents to $28.77.

mikemover 01-11-2007 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dacia (Post 1382873)
Excellent summary kknudson.
I am sick of Mac people's attitude, whenever someone poses a Windows question here, invariably some pretentious "genious" feels the need to offer a real helpful advice, like "Why don't you get a Mac?". Mac has its advantages, none that would me make switch over to a machine where I can't add or exchange components and or peripherals from the vendor of my choice, at my convenience. No way in hell will I be locked in with one hardware manufacturer. Screw Jobs and his business model.
A few years ago Apple almost went bankrupt because of its proprietary hardware.
I run XP/SP2 with 2g memory on a 17" Toshiba Satellite, use Firefox and have/had no problems, no viruses, worms, etc, even though it is connected to the Net 24/7.
I reboot maybe once or twice a month, it runs along just fine.

Alex

Misinformation.

I have NEVER had any trouble finding and/or adding any peripherals or software to my Mac. And I have done so many, many times. And they DON'T have to be made by Apple. The myth that everything is Apple-proprietary is just that: Myth.

In fact, the ONLY thing I recall having purchased that is an Apple product, other than the computer itself, is a new keyboard--Not because it was my only option, but because I liked the clear/white aesthetics of the Apple model.

Adding peripherals to a Mac could not be easier. There is no "sweet talking" it into working, as I have experienced with Windows machines SO many times... Installing a new video card on my mother's brand new PC a few weeks ago was a 1 1/2-day long nightmare! Ditto for the last time I had to install a sound car for her, a year or so ago on her old computer. Ditto for the printer problems I helped a friend with the other day. Ditto for the USB 2 card I helped someone install in his Compaq last month....

When I get a new piece of hardware, I plug it into my Mac and it WORKS. Period. That's it. No struggle, no driver conflicts, no rebooting two dozen times, no dealing with MS-DOS, no "please wait while windows is unable to find the software for your new hardware" messages, no calling customer support, no headaches of any kind.

With VERY few exceptions, any software worth owning that is available for PC is available for Mac nowadays.

Hell, for those who just absolutely, positively can't live without Windows for some insane reason, you can easily run Mac OSX AND Windows on the newest Intel-based Macs!

Speaking of OSX... Although it is LINUX-based, it is NOT "nerd-oriented" like the many versions of LINUX/UNIX are... You don't have to be a programmer or know any mysterious language or secrets to use a Mac. OSX is AT LEAST as user-friendly and low-maintenance as the Windows interface... in fact, it is MORESO in many ways: I don't have to spend time updating my virus software once or twice a week and running virus scans. I don't have to worry about defragmenting my hard drive all the time. I don't have to reboot periodically to cure mysterious glitches and quirks (In fact, I can't even REMEMBER that last time I turned my Mac off!)...

So when someone comes around wondering what to do about their Poltergeist-infested PC (which is inevitable).... My answer will ALWAYS be "Get a Mac."

I am not trying to be elitist, it is just a fact.

After spending VERY EXTENSIVE time using both, I have found that Macs are simpler, easier to use, more stable, more reliable... superior in almost every way.

Sorry if the truth ruffles some feathers. It is hardly the first time.


Mike

MedMech 01-11-2007 10:07 AM

Exactly Mike, I used to rag on Apple's until I had the opportunity for an extended demo. It is not talked about much but Apple real strong point is the easy addition of peripherals and especially networking tasks.

I am not a fanboy if Windows was better I would use it but for now its Apple.

Botnst 01-11-2007 02:46 PM

I use Winders at work. It works, and somebody else pays for it.

At home I use Macs. They work and I pay.

If Winders stops *****-slapping me I'll buy one for home use.

cmac2012 01-13-2007 02:34 PM

I for one am deeply grateful for this new breakthrough product from Apple. I've been concerned for some time now that our youth have been unable to get access to the sort of like, hot tunes, man, that they desperately need to compete in today's world.

If our youth have a shortage of music stored on their portable devices, why, the consequences are just too horrible to contemplate. Only by having mass, mega hot jams at our disposal will we finally be able to bury all this 'hippies playing guitars and singing' crap.

Further, any bottlenecks at downloading ringtones will hopefully be alleviated by this device, freeing up all sorts of productive energies for our nation's economy.

Botnst 01-13-2007 04:44 PM

Hope it has spell-check.

B

MedMech 01-13-2007 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 1386550)
Hope it has spell-check.

B

R U kding me OMFG U need to lrn aol spk.

http://ssshotaru.homestead.com/files/aolertranslator.html

cmac2012 01-14-2007 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 1386550)
Hope it has spell-check.

Oh dear, as I suspected, I did indeed misspell one word in my missive. Alleviated gets two "Ls." Oh, woe is me.

Kuan 06-27-2007 09:08 PM

So who's getting one?

TheDon 06-27-2007 09:12 PM

I'm going to wait til my current contract goes up in november and will probably get a blackjack instead...

Zeus 06-27-2007 09:14 PM

I might...eventually. :rolleyes:

Very sick of our society's keeping up with the Jones' technology gadget race where you are usually a glorified lab rat stuffing someone else's (read Jobs, Gates, et. al) pockets with your hard earned cash.

Everything high-tech starts off stupid expensive, and it's 'cool' and 'elite' to have the newest thing. Then it gets old fast, a newer version comes out - inevitably smaller and faster - and everyone on the cutting edge with money to burn buys those and your prized gadget is now 1/2 its price. And 'so yesterday'.

So...I'll give it time for others to work out the inevitable bugs, network issues, and for the carriers and the market to perform their back and forth dance until some decent rates are offered.

Maybe by the time the iPhone Nano comes out, I'll jump on.

Not to rain on anyone's parade, mind. ;)

Botnst 06-27-2007 09:43 PM

Let me put it this way: If my bag phone still worked I'd use it.

B

Dee8go 06-27-2007 09:46 PM

I felt tempted when the hype began, but my Treo 650 is working just fine. Maybe once they've gone through the initial phase and the bugs have been worked out and the prices have come down.

I live Sprint service. Until they offer a Sprint-compatible I Phone, I'll be using what I've already got. I'll NEVER own a smart phone with Windows saftware on it. Or a car. Or a stove, refrigerator, house, boat, headge trimmer,lawn mower, . . .

LaRondo 06-27-2007 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus (Post 1382583)
Soon to be followed by the iPhone Nano, then the iPhone Neuro, which will be a tiny implant inserted into one's cochlea.

The real question is, when to jump on the wagon? :D

'iPhone Neuro' ? It that a special design upgrade for cell phone neurotics?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website