Rush Limbaugh - Page 6 - PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

cudaspaz · #76 02-27-2008, 08:12 PM

No, she is just a plain ***** in the sense that she is a ***** to everyone who ever worked for or near her for any given amount of time.

Bio300TDTdriver · #77 02-27-2008, 09:34 PM

Why do I keep reading this thread? Why has it made it to 6 pages? I need to get a life.

Matt L · #78 02-27-2008, 09:39 PM

It's only two pages here. Try upping the posts per page.

aklim · #79 02-27-2008, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cudaspaz

They do it because they are insecure with themselves and jealous of others,

but I usually beat the bullies up no matter how big they were.

I was no bully, just fearless to the point of being dangerous which worked well for scaring them away.

That may all be. However, by doing it, they feel good which is why they do it.

I left them alone, they left me alone. I didn't see why I should get tangled with them. Even if I do beat them, I know I will take some lumps. You don't wrestle with the devil and come out with your whole skin.

As long as you can beat them, you can scare them. If they beat you, it will be a different story.

cmac2012 · #80 02-27-2008, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaulC

Gosh, so much ado about nothing. Rush Limbaugh is no more or less than an entertainer and a promoter, as is virtually any commentator on the airwaves. Why anyone would allow his commentary to move them in any direction is beyond me. He is a product sold to his sponsors who try to sell their products to us. Let's not ennoble or castigate him, but recognize that he is simply a very well-paid vacuum cleaner salesman. Letting him push your buttons is akin to allowing a piece of junk mail from Publisher's Clearing House to piss you off.

I think that's an over-simplification. The freshman group at the House in '94 made him an honorary member and not by accident.

The dude has whipped up much frenzy based on mostly inaccurate or heavily slanted information. Poor guy is finally being marginalized, as people have seen that the hatred of Bush, that he often lampoons, is actually based on some sound reasoning.

Ol' Limbaloney thought the country was going to swallow another chicken-hawk who believed his spiritual path involved special knowledge after enduring 8 years of just that.

Watching Romney endorse McCain, I realized what's weird about his body language: he's a pencil necked geek! Dude probably hasn't lifted anything heavier than his cuff-links in years.

cmac2012 · #81 02-27-2008, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim

Kindergarten bullies are not angry. I'd venture to say they are happy when they are bullying others. If not, why would they be doing it unless it made them feel good?

What a breakthrough! Why . . . this changes everything! Notify the press at once!

aklim · #82 02-27-2008, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmac2012

What a breakthrough! Why . . . this changes everything! Notify the press at once!

Well, RichC said they were angry

t walgamuth · #83 02-27-2008, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cudaspaz

No, she is just a plain ***** in the sense that she is a ***** to everyone who ever worked for or near her for any given amount of time.

You worked for her?

Tom W

MS Fowler · #84 02-28-2008, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash

When they say the same thing about males I might agree with you. Till then it is a sexist statement in my opinion. When people start asking why men always wear the same suite, when people ask men not to be so 'hard' and show their emotional side ... and the list goes on.
.

Rush was simply asking the question. Is that sexist?
Sexism is in the answer; not the question.

RichC · #85 02-28-2008, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim

Well, RichC said they were angry

I was responding to cudaspaz's right wing rant.

Not proposing a psychological theory.

------------------------
Gotta love those right wing guys.
Always griping about something.
Blaming someone else for their problems.
Whining and crying about liberal crybabies.
-----------------------

Thanks
RichC

.

davidmash · #86 02-28-2008, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MS Fowler

Rush was simply asking the question. Is that sexist?
Sexism is in the answer; not the question.

I dissagree. If the same questions are not asked of the male candidates, then I believe the remark is sexist.

Botnst · #87 02-28-2008, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash

I dissagree. If the same questions are not asked of the male candidates, then I believe the remark is sexist.

So the sexism is in not asking the male candidates.

davidmash · #88 02-28-2008, 03:09 PM

Yes. I believe there is a double standard in the way women and men are judged which have little to do with their ability to do a particular job.

t walgamuth · #89 02-28-2008, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cudaspaz

No, she is just a plain ***** in the sense that she is a ***** to everyone who ever worked for or near her for any given amount of time.

So you actually talked to everybody who ever worked for her?

Tom W

davidmash · #90 02-28-2008, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cudaspaz

No, she is just a plain ***** in the sense that she is a ***** to everyone who ever worked for or near her for any given amount of time.

Why would the people currently working for her still be employed there if they all thought she was a *****? That does not make sense.