Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict
You really have low reading comprehension. If you comprehended the posts that I referred you to, you'd see that aklim helped me make the point to which I was referring to in the post that you're complaining about.
OK, in the plainest of plain English, here's my point again: Your guns won't do squat against your government or a foreign invading force. Recent insurgencies in other countries only prove that. In Iraq by far the most effective insurgent weapon has been bombs (IED's and suicide bombings), not guns.
As far as fighting back, I never made any comment on whether one should or shouldn't. That's a personal decision and it shouldn't be a mindless one. For me it would depend on the odds of success and the alternative.
|
Most effective you say? But you also say guns won't do squat? But infer that they do accomplish something. Only, for like the 30th time, you also say, the most effective means should be illegal. That's something like willful enslavement, and you even seem proud of it judging by other posts.
So... you confirmed what I was saying. You have no opinion, and aren't too partial to freedom.
Better to live on your knees, and die that way, too, I always say. See, there's this thing, kinda outlines the traditional US foundation called 'The Declaration of Independence'. What does it say about defense against tyrannical government? Not a right, but a duty.
You people are more dangerous than any military, foreign or domestic.
11-12-2008, 10:07 PM
Hybrid Mode
