well, he hasn't denied it. yet. :D

(i hope my feeble attempts at satire haven't offended you.)

.........true.......that means he's got to be guilty..........

..........not at all.........I enjoy it..........;)

(((( In the future, you'll probably earn some additional trolling violations

if its at the risk of free speach than it will be worn as a badge of honor

you procive my lack of substance reinforces my resolve

it is awfull to think one can be subjected to banishment because of differs of opinion WOW

The truth Police is on what channel SIR for i must be mistaken in my view and need redirection What was it again

(((( Sorry that you're unable to comprehend it, but I make no apologizes for widely known truths about the network.

(((( you'd done nothing but state Fox News positions

i must have missed something FOX has some big boys on it and i think they may state their own case i watch them sure and tonight Sarah is on at 8 pm selling a book WOW go figuer someone on th right can read AND write

GET a grip dude your not on earth alone -- jz

It's kind of like the speech Ian McKellen, as the nefarious Number Two, made in the last episode of the Prisoner:

"The man is impersonating Number Two. He is not Number Two. You will know he is not Number Two because he is not."

Well, shoot, ma, that explains everything.

Yes, I'll surely "get a grip"...........and I'll be observing your posts more carefully in the future..........your rants belong elsewhere.

some might be right, it is certainly less now. Brian Williams of NBC news opined that Cronkite and his ilk could never exist in the newsrooms of today.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/tempe/articles/2009/11/19/20091119cronkite1119.html

In Cronkite's era, facts mattered more, he said. Opinion was kept out of the news. Now, it's difficult to separate news from opinion, but good journalism is out there for those who know where to look, he added.


An attorney does his client a disservice by not discussing the impracticallities of "going to the mat" for "the principle of the thing." Personally, I have seen fortunes squandered "for the priniciple of the thing" despite my own warnings. As a profession, attorneys are often depicted as "hired guns" but that tends to reflect that part of the practice that is all about the billing and not so much about the client.

Yikes....
 

"Sarah Palin should be elected President of the United States in 2012 because she is the perfect representation of everything this country stands for".


Did I actually SAY that? Or just think it? :eek:

Fox deals alot in manufactured news which is much different than opinion news.

No objection to an attorney explaining the case to the client and the likelihood of prevailing if he can possibly put a realistic number on it.

But, as you know, most torts are taken on contingency and the cost of the litigation is borne by the attorney. As a profession, it takes an attorney with some integrity who views the law above the last dollar, to take a case to trial rather than settling for a reduced monetary value in order to get the "sure thing".

Nothing in the above paragraph suggests that an attorney should attempt to take a case to trial that has no chance of standing on it's own merits.

Early today while reporting on Sarah Palin's new book "Going Rogue" Fox put up a photo of the satirical book "Going Rouge" . They quickly apologized

<conspiracy>They just did that to show that the other mistakes were really mistakes. They're just incompetent.</conspiracy>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3ALxKE8buk They are setting up a "we are just morons" defense.

Thank God. At last I can read your words. Please use that font for your entire posts in future.

That........is not happening.

Conservatism as it exists in the bosom of the American right is essentially a cult, a clique. Mutually reinforced belief. Those outside the cult "just don't get it."

FOX plays to that.