You're wrong and it don't matter how you feel. The people cannot summarily amend the constitution. There is a process described in the constitution by which amendments can be made.

The way the system works, the judiciary is supposed to have the ability to overturn laws, as part of checks and balance. However, once the law makes it into a constitution, agreed upon by 3/4 of the states, that's it.

So some people have some work to do...

On this issue this is soap opera, I agree that I don't care. This issue is about personal validation and social approval.

__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6

I think it is about whether it is OK to have the majority vote on the rights of the minority.

__________________
1998 C230 330,000 miles (currently dead of second failed EIS, yours will fail too, turning you into the dealer's personal human cash machine)
1988 F150 144,000 miles (leaks all the colors of the rainbow)
Previous stars: 1981 Brava 210,000 miles, 1978 128 150,000 miles, 1977 B200 Van 175,000 miles, 1972 Vega (great, if rusty, car), 1972 Celica, 1986.5 Supra

I heard the reason why the measure passed was because of a very large, but silent mormon population within the state.

Either way I think their budget problem is much more comical in my eyes.

__________________
-Typos courtesy of my mobile phone.