Therein lies the issue. The admin, whatever admin is in power can and will put up everything they can to say how quick and easy it will be. They also told us that the 2nd Gulf War would be over in 6 months or so. Bottom line is that if this is your pet project, you are going to sell it by telling us all the good and none of the bad. Legislators always push their agenda by telling you how easy it is and how good it will be. Ever seen one that is trying to sell you a point and tells you the negative possibilities? I haven't. During the gas price spike after Katrina, the salesman took your car and sold you an econobox. Sure, he told you how much cheaper it would be to run, etc, etc. Do you think he will say "OTOH, your truck is paid for and you are getting a new car payment. BTW, only at current gas prices and if you drive a lot of miles AND keep your car for a long time (unlikely to happen) will you actually start to make money."? Probably not. Otherwise they won't sell the econobox.

What we need to realize is that the famous line in House MD is "EVERYBODY LIES".

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow

To clear up a few points....

One......

George Kaiser may be a distant relative of the Kaiser of shipbuilding fame, but it is doubtful they ever met. George went to school in Tulsa and then on to Harvard. He joined a small oil and gas company owned by his uncle and then did very well for himself. He made some of his money from owning The Bank of Oklahoma which he bought when it went broke some years ago. If you understand Oklahoma then you know that banking here is just another branch of the oil business.

If you don't know oil then you should stay away from lending to that business. But if you do know oil......

George is famous for, among other things, telling lawmakers that ALL tax breaks for oil companies should be done away with. If you hit oil the last problem you have is not enough money. If you don't hit oil then all the tax breaks in the world are of little use to you.

George is also one of the top 50 Americans when it come to supporting charity.

George's uncle fled the Nazi's with just the clothes on his back and came to the US where he landed in Oklahoma and drifted into the oil business. He was lucky and hit more wells than dusters. When George took over he took a more scientific approach and did even better than his uncle. He is now considered to be worth about $4,000,000,000 which would make him one of the 100 richest Americans according to Forbes.

Two......

I am fully supportive of any investigation into this solar company loan, but I suspect that the Republicans will soon allow it to die a quite death. I am already hearing on right wing radio statements such as 'These are the facts I chose to believe'. Sounds like the facts of the Bush Administration concerning this entire event are coming to light and the right wing press is trying to figure out how to back away from this mess. One thing that has come out but has not been widely reported on is that there were 148 applications for the available funds in 2006. Eleven projects were selected and this was one of them.

Why? It is now suspected that the second largest investor in this company, a member of the Walton family, had something to do with this. But that is currently just talk and that is why this needs to be looked into.

Three......

The cost of Ethanol being greater than gasoline is not a factor in its' use as it is well known that ethanol contains less BTU content than gasoline. Ethanol is used for its' ability to pump oxygen into the air which reduces pollution. MTBE used to be used for this purpose, but it mixes well with water and is toxic to humans. When MTBE leaks into a water table the water table is destroyed; when Ethanol leaks into a water table it combines with the water and is diluted to the point of being almost undetectable.

Four.....

Something I don't understand but have been told by people that are better at accounting than myself is that the US is on the hook for $75 million, not $550 million. This has something to do with the way the contract is written.

The value of this solar companies' property is said to exceed $1 Billion, which is hard to believe, and if this is true the US would not lose a penny on this deal. All of the property, both real and personal, will be sold off and the proceeds will pay back the investors.

The cost to the taxpayers remains to be seen, but any statement that the US has 'lost' anything on this is currently unfounded.

To the contrary.

Can't the Senate Committee grant them immunity and compel their testimony?

__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags

That reality isn't part of Pooka's fantasy.

Who wants to do that? At this time, it is wide open. OTOH, if they cannot find something after some work, they might.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow

If anyone is going to do that, I would guess it would be some House committee. I'll bet Rep. Gardner has already requested it. Their asserting the Fifth and then being immunized will be like porn for him.

I have no idea whether immunization is likely in a case like this.

What will they do, send out the capitol police? The Congress is a political, not executive body. They don't have executive authority or power. Like the Supremes. Or as President Jackson observed, "Mr Marshall has made his law. Now let him enforce it." Marshall was a justice, not an executive. Jackson emasculated his ruling. Due to which, the Cherokee nation suffered mightily. Yay President Jackson.

You might consult with G. Gordon Liddy about the ability of the House to cited someone for contempt. He recieved a six month suspended sentence.

"Contempt of Congress is any improper attempt to obstruct the legislative process, usually by a refusal to provide information that Congress has requested. The contempt power is critical to Congress's ability to investigate the activities of the executive branch or any issue about which it is considering enacting legislation. Congress can use contempt citations against witnesses who refuse to testify or to produce required evidence. Those found guilty of contempt of Congress may go to prison.

There are three methods of prosecuting for contempt of Congress. First, Congress can try contempt cases itself. In 1848 and 1871 the Senate did just that, imprisoning newspaper reporters in the Capitol for not revealing the source of the Senate secrets they had published. Congress can also turn contempt cases over to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. However, juries have often acquitted individuals charged with contempt, especially if it appears that the congressional committee abused its power. For example, between 1950 and 1966 the House Un-American Activities Committee issued 133 contempt citations, but only nine people were convicted. Finally, the Senate or House can also file civil charges of contempt. Using this procedure, a federal judge determines whether a question asked by Congress was legitimate. If the judge orders a witness to answer and the witness refuses, then the witness would be in contempt of court and could be fined or imprisoned. For example, during the Watergate investigation the House cited G. Gordon Liddy for contempt for refusing to testify before a House committee. A federal judge gave Liddy a suspended six-month sentence.

The Supreme Court has upheld Congress's power to punish for contempt but has specified some limitations against its unreasonable use. In the case of McGrain v. Daugherty in 1927, the Court ruled that “a legislative body cannot legislate wisely or effectively in the absence of information…. Experience has taught that mere requests for such information often are unavailing, and also that information which is volunteered is not always accurate or complete; so some means of compulsion are essential to obtain that which is needed.”

http://www.answers.com/topic/contempt-of-congress

Liddy worked under the authority of the executive branch. The ruling circumscribed the president's claim of "executive privilege", and thus protect Liddy. All congressmen have denounced exec privilege, all presidents embrace it.


I do not believe that a private citizen has ever been compelled to testify in Congress. Imunity is offered precisely because they cannot compel.

What about that baseball player that did the steroids that told em he didn't?

I'm wondering what in heck our elected officials are doing investigating stuff like that for.

__________________
Jim

Quote:

Originally Posted by MS Fowler Can't the Senate Committee grant them immunity and compel their testimony?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst What will they do, send out the capitol police? The Congress is a political, not executive body. They don't have executive authority or power. Like the Supremes. Or as President Jackson observed, "Mr Marshall has made his law. Now let him enforce it." Marshall was a justice, not an executive. Jackson emasculated his ruling. Due to which, the Cherokee nation suffered mightily. Yay President Jackson.

As the original discussion involved Solyndra officials and the granting them immunity and thereby compelling their testimony the question you posed appeared to be about the power of Congress or the limitation of their power to accomplish that.

I posted an answer that clearly documents the power of the Congress to either compel or in the absence of, sanction individuals, by three specific methodologies.

With regard to your statement “The ruling circumscribed the president's claim of "executive privilege", and thus protect Liddy.” Is it your contention that the finding of guilty and the imposition of a suspended six-month sentence constitutes the protection of Liddy and the circumscription of executive power?

Perhaps there is some misunderstanding as to what MS Fowler stated; I don’t think he suggested that self incriminatory testimony could be compelled, but that the granting of full or partial immunity would in effect overcome any 5th amendment objection. This has been the case as I understand it, numerous individuals have been immunized and compelled to testify before Congress probably Col. Oliver North being one of the more famous or infamous.

Naw, today we're all upset over the DOJ officials who have been paying $16 a piece for muffins at their meetings.

An unnamed DOJ official commented off the record that "We are appalled by this and will be looking into it . . . "

I feel better now .

__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles

Turns out the reporter didn't look closely enough a the food bill. The conference provided breakfast and light lunch for the attendees at a cost of about $21 per person. This was at a nice hotel that usually charges $5 for a cup of coffee, so it seems now they got a pretty good deal. Because of the way the price was negotiated, the $16 was lumped into a line item for pastries, muffins, etc.

__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma

How about this? In the not too distant past, government meetings were not held in lavishly expen$ive hotels. A very basic old government building with a row of fold up tables and fold up chairs and a big, aluminum West Bend coffee pot. If they were lucky, some kind soul stopped by the donut shop before the meeting.

They fail to take into account that they are lavishly spending OUR money. It is not THEIR money.

__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution