BillyBob Wants to Kill the Pretty Girls Thread

[PaulC]

Originally Posted by Billybob

Yes.

You are inferring an implication that has not been made, I've noted the disparity and questioned it's origins.

This is your statement?

Originally Posted by Billybob

I do find it very amusing that some of the most virulent and demanding of “forum law and order” characters not only regularly violate this ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT TOU provision but they also seem to enjoy immunity from doing so! That in the process it exposes some hypocrisy is priceless.

It's more than just an implication; it's a flat-out assertion of moderator bias! Surely you can come up with just one example over the past few weeks of the behavior you're referring to above!

[Billybob]

Originally Posted by PaulC

This is your statement?



It's more than just an implication; it's a flat-out assertion of moderator bias! Surely you can come up with just one example over the past few weeks of the behavior you're referring to above!

HA! HA! HA! You better take a deep breath PaulyC!

Your post of copyrighted material in violation of the TOU Copyright Restriction Enhanced Enforcement remains, maybe the moderators are waiting for you to tell on yourself first!

At least one OD moderator has apparently viewed the page and its postings as evidenced by his commentary on the posters "taking pot shots at each other" and threatened "If it continues like that we'll just lock it down."

It is been explained by a moderator that sjh posted copyrighted material in violation of the TOU provisions and the moderators deleted that material, you have posted copyrighted material in violation of the TOU and moderators have not deleted it. That is a disparity, the cause of which is not known to me.

Two of the three OD moderators have posted to the thread's page after your posting of copyrighted material, perhaps it's as simple as they post to threads without reviewing or reading prior postings and are unaware. As I suspect the vast majority of forum members don't feel the need to covertly contacting the moderators feigning offence at the posting by another of copyrighted material in violation of the TOU, perhaps until you report yourself or one of your similarly like minded fellows does the disparity will remain.

[PaulC]

Originally Posted by Billybob

HA! HA! HA! You better take a deep breath PaulyC!

Your post of copyrighted material in violation of the TOU Copyright Restriction Enhanced Enforcement remains, maybe the moderators are waiting for you to tell on yourself first!

At least one OD moderator has apparently viewed the page and its postings as evidenced by his commentary on the posters "taking pot shots at each other" and threatened "If it continues like that we'll just lock it down."

It is been explained by a moderator that sjh posted copyrighted material in violation of the TOU provisions and the moderators deleted that material, you have posted copyrighted material in violation of the TOU and moderators have not deleted it. That is a disparity, the cause of which is not known to me.

Two of the three OD moderators have posted to the thread's page after your posting of copyrighted material, perhaps it's as simple as they post to threads without reviewing or reading prior postings and are unaware. As I suspect the vast majority of forum members don't feel the need to covertly contacting the moderators feigning offence at the posting by another of copyrighted material in violation of the TOU, perhaps until you report yourself or one of your similarly like minded fellows does the disparity will remain.

Fell for it. Now you're making a veiled accusation regarding two moderators.

[Billybob]

Originally Posted by PaulC

Fell for it. Now you're making a veiled accusation regarding two moderators.

Reciting the facts and asking questions does not in any way constitute a "veiled accusation", and the idea that somehow you've constructed something that you think I "Fell for" is at the same time hilarious and profoundly sad.

[PaulC]

Originally Posted by Billybob

Reciting the facts and asking questions does not in any way constitute a "veiled accusation", and the idea that somehow you've constructed something that you think I "Fell for" is at the same time hilarious and profoundly sad.

Of course it is. How could someone with your intellect ever be duped?