OWS message is clear. - Page 6 - PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

Air&Road · #76 10-20-2011, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTI

Actually, it goes to show how quick some are to harsly judge, without facts.

That's me! When someone shows so much irresponsibility as to go to a place of known drugs and criminal activity, I don't cut them much slack.

elchivito · #77 10-20-2011, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarryBible

That's me! When someone shows so much irresponsibility as to go to a place of known drugs and criminal activity, I don't cut them much slack.

Better stay in the house Larry. No wait, get under the bed and just stay there. I'll bet there's drugs and criminal activity within a pistol shot of your house.

Air&Road · #78 10-20-2011, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito

Better stay in the house Larry. No wait, get under the bed and just stay there. I'll bet there's drugs and criminal activity within a pistol shot of your house.

You obviously have never seen where I live. There is not even another HOUSE within a pistol shot of mine. Unless there's something going on in the far corner of my far pasture that I'm not aware of, then there's nothing like this going on anywhere close to me.

BTW, I did not say that I was scared of them. I was trying to indicate that anyone hanging around such a place with such known activity is either EXTREMELY and dangerously naive, or they engage in such activity themselves.

MS Fowler · #79 10-20-2011, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Honus

You make it sound as if there are two sides - Tea Party versus AWS. I don't know whether either of those factions (if that's the right word) can be so neatly categorized. I am also not sure what sort of organization you would recommend for AWS. They seem to be making a point to not be boxed in to a specific list of policy proposals, so I am not sure what sort of organization you would recommend for them.

You and I agree---again!!!
Does that thought terrify you?

elchivito · #80 10-20-2011, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarryBible

You obviously have never seen where I live. There is not even another HOUSE within a pistol shot of mine. Unless there's something going on in the far corner of my far pasture that I'm not aware of, then there's nothing like this going on anywhere close to me.

BTW, I did not say that I was scared of them. I was trying to indicate that anyone hanging around such a place with such known activity is either EXTREMELY and dangerously naive, or they engage in such activity themselves.

what exactly is the "known" activity?

SwampYankee · #81 10-20-2011, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MS Fowler

You and I agree---again!!!
Does that thought terrify you?

I'm thinking of heading to the bunker...

Air&Road · #82 10-20-2011, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito

what exactly is the "known" activity?

You must not listen or watch the news. There is liberal drug use, free sex ala Woodstock, defacating on police cars. Let's see, they are also hauling people off to jail. Does this not mean that there is criminal activity? With Maranda rights and all, it's kind of difficult to haul anyone to jail if there is not strong suspicion of criminal activity.

elchivito · #83 10-20-2011, 12:06 PM

Free sex? Freesex? Well there you go, they must be commies. Decent capitalists would be charging for it!
Sometimes the POINT of non violent protest is arrest. I watch the news larry. People are hauled off to jail all the time who aren't guilty of criminal activity, or is guilty until proven innocent, the Napoleonic code, the rule of the day in your parallel universe?In case you hadn't noticed, in the U.S. we don't assume guilt until after it's proven.
What's "liberal drug use"? Is it like the opposite of "conservative drug use"? If Bush2 used cocaine, which he admitted to, is that conservative drug use? What if he used it liberally? I'm confused. Please enlighten me, you're so good at making everything simple.

Air&Road · #84 10-20-2011, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito

Free sex? Freesex? Well there you go, they must be commies. Decent capitalists would be charging for it!
Sometimes the POINT of non violent protest is arrest. I watch the news larry. People are hauled off to jail all the time who aren't guilty of criminal activity, or is guilty until proven innocent, the Napoleonic code, the rule of the day in your parallel universe?In case you hadn't noticed, in the U.S. we don't assume guilt until after it's proven.
What's "liberal drug use"? Is it like the opposite of "conservative drug use"? If Bush2 used cocaine, which he admitted to, is that conservative drug use? What if he used it liberally? I'm confused. Please enlighten me, you're so good at making everything simple.

Good job of skirting the issue. There is all sorts of lewid and illegal activity going on at this protest. Yes, not everyone arrested is guilty. When, however, they're hauling lots of people off to jail, there is most likely at least some of them that are guilty of something.

How many tea partiers have been hauled off to the hoosgow?

BTW, your President also did drugs earlier in life including Heroin. What does this have to do with the protestors?

elchivito · #85 10-20-2011, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarryBible

Good job of skirting the issue. There is all sorts of lewid and illegal activity going on at this protest. Yes, not everyone arrested is guilty. When, however, they're hauling lots of people off to jail, there is most likely at least some of them that are guilty of something.

How many tea partiers have been hauled off to the hoosgow?

BTW, your President also did drugs earlier in life including Heroin. What does this have to do with the protestors?

I skirted no issue Larry. You're more than happy to throw the baby out with the bathwater on this protest, and label them all lazy, kids, drug users and commies when you know good and well that that cannot possibly true. You must have missed the news about the tea partiers who were arrested for forcing their way into one of Nancy Pelosi's offices back in 09. Did you miss the bullet holes in office windows and the death threats that were made to senators and congressmen prior to the healthcare vote? I doubt that most of the old ladies in motorized scooters did any pooping on police cars, they had their Depends on. There are other examples too. I'm not going to do your homework for you. Comparing organized, well funded tea party rallies to this protest is apples to oranges anyhow.
I asked you to define liberal drug use as opposed to conservative drug use. I frankly don't care that Bush or Obama used drugs and wouldn't believe them if they claimed they didn't.
You still haven't told me what liberal drug use is. Is it worse than conservative drug use some how?
By the way, he's your President too, unless of course you're not an American. You can refuse to claim him all you want. Makes no never mind.

Air&Road · #86 10-20-2011, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito

I skirted no issue Larry. You're more than happy to throw the baby out with the bathwater on this protest, and label them all lazy, kids, drug users and commies when you know good and well that that cannot possibly true. You must have missed the news about the tea partiers who were arrested for forcing their way into one of Nancy Pelosi's offices back in 09. Did you miss the bullet holes in office windows and the death threats that were made to senators and congressmen prior to the healthcare vote? I doubt that most of the old ladies in motorized scooters did any pooping on police cars, they had their Depends on. There are other examples too. I'm not going to do your homework for you. Comparing organized, well funded tea party rallies to this protest is apples to oranges anyhow.
I asked you to define liberal drug use as opposed to conservative drug use. I frankly don't care that Bush or Obama used drugs and wouldn't believe them if they claimed they didn't.
You still haven't told me what liberal drug use is. Is it worse than conservative drug use some how?
By the way, he's your President too, unless of course you're not an American. You can refuse to claim him all you want. Makes no never mind.

You usually seem to be an intelligent person, but you are making me wonder now.

The word "liberal" as it applies to drug use was not used contextually as a political label. I'll help you out here! Have you ever read on a medication label something like "apply LIBERALLY to the surface of the wound?" Come on, put the old brain in gear here!

MTI · #87 10-20-2011, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarryBible

BTW, your President also did drugs earlier in life including Heroin. What does this have to do with the protestors?

There was disclosure of weed and coke . . . but Heroin, Larry? This one needs a citation, please.

Air&Road · #88 10-20-2011, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTI

There was disclosure of weed and coke . . . but Heroin, Larry? This one needs a citation, please.

I'll let you do the research. Isn't cocaine bad enough?

I'm just curious. Has it never made any of you BO Lovers wonder why he won't release his transcripts or medical records? As far as I'm concerned it should be a requirement for any public office.

At least the bafoon GW released such info.

MTI · #89 10-20-2011, 02:06 PM

Larry, the things you don't know might amaze you someday.

President Obama disclosed the use in his 1995 book "Dreams of My Father." He was a teenager in Hawaii at the time.

elchivito · #90 10-20-2011, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarryBible

You usually seem to be an intelligent person, but you are making me wonder now.

The word "liberal" as it applies to drug use was not used contextually as a political label. I'll help you out here! Have you ever read on a medication label something like "apply LIBERALLY to the surface of the wound?" Come on, put the old brain in gear here!

Wonder all you want. I just wanted to see you, in print, give a different definition to the word "liberal". By the way, other than allegations, I can't find any documentation of drug use or drug arrests during the occupation. Do you have any first hand documentation? Something maybe that comes from somewhere other than tea party blogs?

In addition, I'd like to ask if you'd care to once and for all categorically deny that none of the following are participating anywhere in any of the protests?

gainfully employed persons
people who are actively seeking but cannot find employment
people who worked their whole lives and are now retired
people who do not describe themselves as liberal or progressive
veterans
disabled veterans
employed people who have worked their whole lives, invested in 401Ks and watched them go into the dumper in the last three years.
people employed by banks for their entire careers only to find their pensions lost immediately prior to their retirement.

Go ahead, tell us all here that none of the above are protesting. They're all just a bunch of lazy, doper kids who screw in public without charging and poo on cop cars. We're waiting.