PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Analytical thinking erodes belief in God (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=316981)

aklim 04-30-2012 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbomachines (Post 2929138)
Why did unicorns and dragons get left off the boat? :(:(

Dunno about unicorns but not all the dragons got off the boat. Komodo dragon apparently stayed.

The Clk Man 04-30-2012 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MS Fowler (Post 2929117)
I'm going to assume you asked a serious question, and answer it seriously.
There are several answers.
Some scholars note in Genesis 1:2 " the earth was formless and void", and take a hard look at the word "void", or empty. Compare that with every other instance of God's creative work, where it is always said " It was good". Taking a few other passages from Scripture, they believe that the creation account we have is really a "re-creation" that there was an earlier creation ( a gap between the first 2 verses) that was destroyed when Satan was cast to the earth. It may not be satisfying to you, but it is one of the answers given.
Another answer is that the flood materially changed earth. Note there was no record of rainfall prior to the flood.
Yet another is the understanding that God created with "apparent age". The easiest illustration of this would be to ask how old did Adam and Eve look one day after their creation? They probably were created as mature; not as infants. The argument then goes on to use that same line to explain all the fossil and geological record.

There may be others, but those are a few ways that Biblical literalists understand the Genesis account.

That was on the spot and correct.

elchivito 04-30-2012 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Clk Man (Post 2929178)
That was on the spot and correct.

What's correct? He offered several explanations there. Are they ALL correct?

elchivito 04-30-2012 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Clk Man (Post 2929178)
That was on the spot and correct.

Is it necessary to discard science and reason altogether in order to have personal faith in Jesus? If it is, why?

aklim 04-30-2012 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito (Post 2929190)
Is it necessary to discard science and reason altogether in order to have personal faith in Jesus? If it is, why?

Concerning that, I woul say you have to suspend science and the need for Proof.

elchivito 04-30-2012 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim (Post 2929194)
Concerning that, I woul say you have to suspend science and the need for Proof.

It's called a leap of faith. This alleged god creates beings and gives them, supposedly unique among all living things, the power of reason. He gives them a thirst for knowledge. He gifts them with these powers and then requires that they NOT use them. He requires that they instead must believe in cheap parlor tricks as proof of his existence. This is a vain, capricious god if you ask me. One who plays games with his creations. Sets expectations for his little experiments and then goofs on them when they dare to utilize the very powers he gave them. Punishes them eternally in very un-godly and un-forgiving fashion for their screw ups.
I'll pass on that little god, until I watch an amputee re-grow a limb with the power of prayer.

MS Fowler 04-30-2012 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito (Post 2929202)
It's called a leap of faith. This alleged god creates beings and gives them, supposedly unique among all living things, the power of reason. He gives them a thirst for knowledge. He gifts them with these powers and then requires that they NOT use them. He requires that they instead must believe in cheap parlor tricks as proof of his existence. This is a vain, capricious god if you ask me. One who plays games with his creations. Sets expectations for his little experiments and then goofs on them when they dare to utilize the very powers he gave them. Punishes them eternally in very un-godly and un-forgiving fashion for their screw ups.
I'll pass on that little god, until I watch an amputee re-grow a limb with the power of prayer.

It is NOT a Leap of Faith!!!
That is a Kierkegaard term It is completely irrational, or even beyond reason, and not at all descriptive of Biblical Faith.
It is not a blind leap off the side of the mountain in the hope that there is a ledge just below. It is a response based on knowledge that God is trustworthy in all cases where I can verify, and therefore it is reasonable to extend that trust into areas that are not immediately verifiable.

kerry 04-30-2012 03:37 PM

Ok, lets not say it's a leap of faith. Lets call it a leap of complete denial of almost everything that humans have learned about natural history, species development, human evolution, human cultural development, geology, biology and technology over the last 200 years or so. To accept a literal story of the Ark would mean a person could not teach the most basic classes in Paleontology, Biology, Archaeology, History, Geology, and Physical and Cultural Anthropology. Might was well abolish the curriculum of the modern university.

davidmash 04-30-2012 04:18 PM

Can we keep wood shop?

The Clk Man 04-30-2012 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito (Post 2929188)
What's correct? He offered several explanations there. Are they ALL correct?

That is correct.

Carleton Hughes 04-30-2012 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerry (Post 2929227)
Ok, lets not say it's a leap of faith. Lets call it a leap of complete denial of almost everything that humans have learned about natural history, species development, human evolution, human cultural development, geology, biology and technology over the last 200 years or so. To accept a literal story of the Ark would mean a person could not teach the most basic classes in Paleontology, Biology, Archaeology, History, Geology, and Physical and Cultural Anthropology. Might was well abolish the curriculum of the modern university.

Granted. But how can one claim to be a valid member of an ancient, corrupt, hidebound institution like the R.C. church, as an instance without at least pretending to subscribe to it's admittedly risible tenets?

The Clk Man 04-30-2012 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito (Post 2929190)
Is it necessary to discard science and reason altogether in order to have personal faith in Jesus? If it is, why?

NOT AT ALL my friend. Science is proving The Bible to be correct almost daily. Just yesterday I watched a show on the History channel where scientist now believe the humans did NOT evolve from apes. They talked about some kind of "F" dna that ONLY exist in humans. I will try to find that info. :)

aklim 04-30-2012 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elchivito (Post 2929202)
It's called a leap of faith. This alleged god creates beings and gives them, supposedly unique among all living things, the power of reason. He gives them a thirst for knowledge. He gifts them with these powers and then requires that they NOT use them. He requires that they instead must believe in cheap parlor tricks as proof of his existence. This is a vain, capricious god if you ask me. One who plays games with his creations. Sets expectations for his little experiments and then goofs on them when they dare to utilize the very powers he gave them. Punishes them eternally in very un-godly and un-forgiving fashion for their screw ups.

I'll pass on that little god, until I watch an amputee re-grow a limb with the power of prayer.

You forgot manipulative and has a tendency to keep his kids down should he feel that it isn't in his interests.

Even if I did see that miracle and accept that such a deity exists, is it worthy of my worship? I think not.

aklim 04-30-2012 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Clk Man (Post 2929254)
NOT AT ALL my friend. Science is proving The Bible to be correct almost daily. Just yesterday I watched a show on the History channel where scientist now believe the humans did NOT evolve from apes. They talked about some kind of "F" dna that ONLY exist in humans. I will try to find that info. :)

So? What if humankind evolved from species X or another being in the cosmos made us out of space dust or energy? What does it prove?

elchivito 04-30-2012 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Clk Man (Post 2929246)
That is correct.

So then, ANY explanation that tries to justify the Genesis story of creation is Okey Dokey with you, and any science that tries to explain creation based on material evidence is not okay. Am I understanding you correctly?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website