What have you got against it? It's pretty funny.

Oh, right . . . this is serioud business going on here . . .

At least that cat looks cool

I'll bet your vote of confidence means the world to him! Serioudly!

Stay Calm . . . I'm sure Mr. A&R will lend you another "atta boy" as well.

The tortured syntax in your post makes it difficult to comprehend. It is further compounded by spelling errors later in the thread.

Can you correct your errors and repost, please?

Lol, Yak. You did that so well it's hard to believe you're the same guy as on the other thread.

The voices in my head are telling me I should change my user name. That way I could have a crazy persona, and a crazier persona.

By the way, have a great day.

Et tu, Yak.

Yeah, except that the term "black jesus" originated with and is sourced to Obama puppet master David Axlerod presumably as a term of endearment according to Edward Klein's book "The Amatuer" on its page 59! Axlerod has been asked about it directly and elected not to deny it.

So now which Bush confidant referred to GW degrading 'chimp' crap, just so everyone understands what you view as an analagous comparison?

Or are you arguing that the use of a term directly attributable to one of Obama's closest advisors should never be used because of the potential that ignorant partisan reactionaries will squeal with some imagined and inferred offence, as has been the case with the use of the word "niggardly"?

Neither of them do either side any good to use personally insulting and degrading descriptions. usually when people resort to ad hominem they are angry or short on logical ammo.

So when Obama supporters use the term it's positive and unobjectionable, not insulting and degrading and when others who may not support Obama use the same term it's negative and objectionable, insulting and degrading. Because those who don't support Obama by default are only motivated to insult and degrade.

In this case it couldn't have been the the term was appropriated and used mockingly to highlight the Obama cult-of-personality aspect that pervades those supporters and its really not a mis-guided hyper-sensativity to racialist undercurrents and mis-information.

If my brother is a fool and an ass does that mean I should be also?

Except it's not "directly attributable". It's only referenced in ONE right wing book, without proof, not witnessed or recorded. Besides, who cares who made it up? Your use of it is a cheap shot, just like your buddy's "Obama zealots" and other playground taunts. Bot's right, you can do better.
Or can't you?

__________________
You're a daisy if you do.
__________________________________
84 Euro 240D 4spd. 220.5k sold
04 Honda Element AWD
1985 F150 XLT 4x4, 351W with 270k miles, hay hauler
1997 Suzuki Sidekick 4x4
1993 Toyota 4wd Pickup 226K and counting

Sorry Bot........guess I resorted to the left trend about Palin, Coulter, Bachman, and a few others I can't think of right now. How vile and pernicious of me.

Reading comprehension challenged? My only use of the term was in my inquiry about the objection to the use of the term and explaination of where it has been reported to have originated. So maybe you can explain to the rest of the class how my use of it is a cheap shot?

Since when did you become the playground monitor?

[QUOTE=elchivito;2938384]RWNJ of the day goes toooooooo......

Paul Cameron of the Family Research Institute

Somebody might have said they had homosexual relations with President Obama. That means Obama might be gay and since all gays are child molesters , Obama might be one too. The depth of the ignorance and hate of people who take this ****er seriously is kinda scary.

Just calling a spade a spade, Mr. Teacher! Teacher! Juan Called Julio A Name! Can I Get My Teacher's Pet Gold Star Now?