Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:35 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
I'm no McCain fan, but it's hard to imagine him doing any worse. I also can't imagine him dragging us into such a miserable failure of economic policies. I really don't think McCain would have wasted time trying to have the US Government be a bunch of thugs and take over healthcare.

And he certainly would not have wasted tax payers money on a Stimulus package that obviously was not going to work.

I also doubt that McCain would have done anything like issue executive priviledge to cover up for his AG's screw ups instead of firing him and moving on.
Was one of McCain's primary campaign promises that he would nationalize healthcare? That was a huge part of Obama's campaign, and arguably the most important goal of his administration.
First you berate him for not living up to campaign promises that he never made, now you are berating him for fulfilling the largest one he made.... Not really sure what you expect.

Back to that old saw... Bush had no responsibility for the bailout? It was all Obama?
AND... the bailout obviously didn't work? Think the folks who's jobs and homes were saved by the bailout have a different opinion than you about that?

__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:36 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
I wish we would totally pull out of the middle eastern wars, its a damn waste of a fine military if you ask me.

If we want to take it over we should just nuke it.

Works for me.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:47 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by benhogan View Post
i am starting to notice that.

so basically this thing will end when one side finally gets tired and moves on (whenever that is). what a waste.

i hate to say this but this might be one we are not going to win. i hope i am wrong.
With no clear distinction of 'enemy', there can be no win. The day's of 'winning' a war are over.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:51 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
The ones who kill people or plot to kill people are bad. The people who get killed are good. I hope that clears it up for you.
Where does that leave the killers of the people who killed the people?
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 08-01-2012, 10:49 AM
Grok this
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Thanks for this additional information.

Can we agree that a nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India is something we would like very much to avoid?
I would like it very much if India and Pakistan can avoid nuking each other.
Want to help cause an outbreak of world peace? The premise of doing this by force IMO is fundamentally flawed. One thing that might help though, is the advancement of advanced nuclear technology. It is possible to have a nuclear reactor which does not necessarily produce weapons material LFTR. Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors also produce a tiny fraction of the other waste products we're normally burdened with. They are much more fault-tolerant (unattended shut-down to a safe state). They are much smaller. They have other advantages which combine to mean that they could be deployed to meet the energy needs of people globally. Search Google for LFTR All of this might mean, that many of the energy starved people of the planet might not need to fight so fiercely for oil (Thorium is plentiful and well distributed on the planet).
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
Are WE capable of preventing it?
Are WE responsible to prevent it?

I read more people complaining about the US should not be the world's policeman. Are you saying need should be the policeman to the world? Who pays that cost?
I also support a "mind our own business" foreign policy, unless absolutely necessary; and consider our current military expenditure to be unsustainable and unwise.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Works for me.
Oh brother, another one! I hope you're joking or trolling.
__________________
Remember, Safety Third!
'99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:11 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 39,042
One of the fellows I used to work with at Purdue, who personally is very laid back and friendly once stated that he wished we would bomb the whole middle east into one big smoking hole in the ground (maybe it was Iraq or Afganistan). He is a big christian so I asked him what about the innocent children and women? He said better if they don't live to reproduce.

That just does not meet my image of what Jesus would want us to do.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:20 AM
Grok this
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
One of the fellows I used to work with at Purdue, who personally is very laid back and friendly once stated that he wished we would bomb the whole middle east into one big smoking hole in the ground (maybe it was Iraq or Afganistan). He is a big christian so I asked him what about the innocent children and women? He said better if they don't live to reproduce.

That just does not meet my image of what Jesus would want us to do.
I'm nobody's theologian, but I agree it does not sound like a very christian thing to do.
__________________
Remember, Safety Third!
'99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:27 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by cullennewsom View Post
I would like it very much if India and Pakistan can avoid nuking each other.
Want to help cause an outbreak of world peace? The premise of doing this by force IMO is fundamentally flawed. One thing that might help though, is the advancement of advanced nuclear technology. It is possible to have a nuclear reactor which does not necessarily produce weapons material LFTR. Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors also produce a tiny fraction of the other waste products we're normally burdened with. They are much more fault-tolerant (unattended shut-down to a safe state). They are much smaller. They have other advantages which combine to mean that they could be deployed to meet the energy needs of people globally. Search Google for LFTR All of this might mean, that many of the energy starved people of the planet might not need to fight so fiercely for oil (Thorium is plentiful and well distributed on the planet).


I also support a "mind our own business" foreign policy, unless absolutely necessary; and consider our current military expenditure to be unsustainable and unwise.




Oh brother, another one! I hope you're joking or trolling.

Yeah, GREAT IDEA! Just shut down the military altogether. There's no one in the world who wants to kill us. Just do away with that expense so that we can give more money to the people in this country who choose not to work and also have more money to give away in foreign aide.

YEAH! GREAT IDEA! What a GENIUS you are!!!!
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:48 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by cullennewsom View Post
Someone tell that guy that his account's been hacked by a 13 year old.
Clearly my point flew over your head, try thinking a bit and maybe you can reach up and grasp at it.

Let me give you a hint since your so good with Google searching and finding that cute little aircraft carrier poster.

What has been the past military successes and failures in the Middle East? Outcomes? How were they achieved? How long have Europeans been fighting over the Middle East?
__________________
2006 CL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2026 Genesis GV70
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:05 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
Was one of McCain's primary campaign promises that he would nationalize healthcare? That was a huge part of Obama's campaign, and arguably the most important goal of his administration.
First you berate him for not living up to campaign promises that he never made, now you are berating him for fulfilling the largest one he made.... Not really sure what you expect.

Back to that old saw... Bush had no responsibility for the bailout? It was all Obama?
AND... the bailout obviously didn't work? Think the folks who's jobs and homes were saved by the bailout have a different opinion than you about that?
Are you sure about nationalizing healthcare was a HUGE part of Obama's campaign? I think that might be a little revision of history. Obama's campaign, and here on OD was that he was not GB. He carefully avoided any details in his zeal for hope and change. The genius of that approach was that everyone got to define Obama as he/ she wanted. I think the healthcare issue came to the fore during the campaign, and even more afterward, but I would not say it was a huge part of his campaign.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 08-01-2012, 12:54 PM
Grok this
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Yeah, GREAT IDEA! Just shut down the military altogether. There's no one in the world who wants to kill us. Just do away with that expense so that we can give more money to the people in this country who choose not to work and also have more money to give away in foreign aide.

YEAH! GREAT IDEA! What a GENIUS you are!!!!
To be fair, I think you may be mis-characterizing my position a little bit. Just to be clear, I am not a proponent of any plan nor am I even aware of any plan to "Just shut down the military altogether" and use the proceeds to "give more money to the people in this country who choose not to work and also have more money to give away in foreign aide."

I do think our military is way too big, and has become a jobs program (busy work) via defense technology spending and also via the military itself. Did you ever think that the expense of the cold war arms race may be what brought down the USSR because their economy was inferior to ours and that they simply bankrupted themselves first? And maybe since we continue to spend on the mil as before that we might bankrupt ourselves next? And that we risk letting the Chinese win the race to dominance without ever firing a bullet? And what about all the productivity lost by not investing that money in sci-tech research? Or just not spending it?
__________________
Remember, Safety Third!
'99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:21 PM
Grok this
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
Clearly my point flew over your head, try thinking a bit and maybe you can reach up and grasp at it.
I'm going to try.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
Let me give you a hint since your so good with Google searching and finding that cute little aircraft carrier poster.
You don't like my poster?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
What has been the past military successes and failures in the Middle East?
Natives +1000. Everyone whose name wasn't Chinggis Khan has been sent packing, licking their wounds, wishing they hadn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
Outcomes?
It seems the best anyone has done is to deny access or claim to the resources by anyone else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
How were they achieved?
I don't know exactly how Chinggis did it. It is an impressive legacy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
How long have Europeans been fighting over the Middle East?
Since the Crusades? (I have no idea if the Visigoths or Vandals ever tried to invade the ME. Please share any insight you have.)
__________________
Remember, Safety Third!
'99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:24 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by cullennewsom View Post
To be fair, I think you may be mis-characterizing my position a little bit. Just to be clear, I am not a proponent of any plan nor am I even aware of any plan to "Just shut down the military altogether" and use the proceeds to "give more money to the people in this country who choose not to work and also have more money to give away in foreign aide."

I do think our military is way too big, and has become a jobs program (busy work) via defense technology spending and also via the military itself. Did you ever think that the expense of the cold war arms race may be what brought down the USSR because their economy was inferior to ours and that they simply bankrupted themselves first? And maybe since we continue to spend on the mil as before that we might bankrupt ourselves next? And that we risk letting the Chinese win the race to dominance without ever firing a bullet? And what about all the productivity lost by not investing that money in sci-tech research? Or just not spending it?

A JOBS program? Are you kidding? Have you bothered to do any research of the numbers. The military has been steadily shrinking for the last forty years.

Do you have the guts to be part of THAT jobs program? Are you ready to walk around on artificial legs?
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:45 PM
Grok this
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
A JOBS program? Are you kidding? Have you bothered to do any research of the numbers. The military has been steadily shrinking for the last forty years.
You mean we had more aircraft carriers in 1972? Amazing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Do you have the guts to be part of THAT jobs program? Are you ready to walk around on artificial legs?
It's an open question and not likely to be answered since I'm past the age limit. I like to think that I have the stones. But, looking back, and seeing the shameful, disrespectful treatment that veterans of late (the years that I would have been involved) have received at the hands of our government, I am not envious. I have great respect for veterans and their sacrifice. And, I have no respect for the chicken hawk cowards that sent them to wars, nor the greedy war profiteers who've enriched themselves at everyone's expense.

How about you? Veteran?
__________________
Remember, Safety Third!
'99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA

Last edited by cullennewsom; 08-01-2012 at 01:46 PM. Reason: fixed formatting
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:50 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by cullennewsom View Post
You mean we had more aircraft carriers in 1972? Amazing!

It's an open question and not likely to be answered since I'm past the age limit. I like to think that I have the stones. But, looking back, and seeing the shameful, disrespectful treatment that veterans of late (the years that I would have been involved) have received at the hands of our government, I am not envious. I have great respect for veterans and their sacrifice. And, I have no respect for the chicken hawk cowards that sent them to wars, nor the greedy war profiteers who've enriched themselves at everyone's expense.

How about you? Veteran?

To measure the size of the military is just a LITTLE more involved than counting the number of carriers. Probably the most common yard stick is troop count.


US Army, Sgt E-5
1968 to 1971

__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page