Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2012, 10:22 AM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Nice little camera...

I recently picked up a Nikon Coolpix L810 for normal use. I looked at the new DSLR as well as the newer mirrorless cameras, and decided I needed something more along the lines of something my daughter can use as well...so the high end ones were out of the race.

I've taken some pretty decent pictures with it so far, and with Picasa as the photo editor, I've been able to enhance the colors a bit, too.

This is from this morning, looking out from my back porch...It's actually about 1/4 mile from the back porch, so I did zoom in a bit for it.



These are from last night's scrimmage my son played in...







This is to show how much I zoomed in for the other pictures...and how far off the field we were sitting.



__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-30-2012, 10:31 AM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
I'm looking for a better editor. I had one back in the 90's, but can't remember what it was called. I used it on some scanned photos I had to fill scratches and remove rusty tack holes that grandpa had put in when he was in WWII. I now have a boat load of black and whites from him and grandma of their parents and other family members. I'd like to be able to do what I did before, and clean them up a bit, but Picasa isn't quite what I'm looking for.

Without spending a ton of money on a program, what are some decent priced editors that work well?
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:32 AM
Stressed Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Florida Big Bend region
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
Without spending a ton of money on a program, what are some decent priced editors that work well?
You might consider GIMP.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:38 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo View Post
You might consider GIMP.
X2 For a free version it seems to do shed loads of stuff. It is way more than what I need but it comes in useful once in a while.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:39 AM
elchivito's Avatar
ĦAy Jodido!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rancho Disparates
Posts: 4,075
GIMP is free and nearly as powerful as Photoshop. A little wonky though. Hey it's free.
__________________
You're a daisy if you do.
__________________________________
84 Euro 240D 4spd. 220.5k sold
04 Honda Element AWD
1985 F150 XLT 4x4, 351W with 270k miles, hay hauler
1997 Suzuki Sidekick 4x4
1993 Toyota 4wd Pickup 226K and counting
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:41 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Well bring out the gimp...
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-30-2012, 01:12 PM
link's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 835
The downsides to the Coolpix and other inexpensive P&S cameras are that they usually produce only a .jpg file and the lenses are somewhat subject to flair and chromatic abortion. Look at the at the line the helmets make in the 3rd image, for example. The blue color at the edge is chromatic aberration. Also a lot of P&S cameras have a considerable lag between the time the shutter is pressed and the image is captured.

For an editor, check out Photoshop Elements. It’s inexpensive, sometimes given away with other programs, and does most things hobbyist do. It can sometimes be found on Ebay for next to nothing, or if you go to your local computer recycler, they will probably have several copies.

Also, Nikon cameras often come with ViewNX which isn’t a bad editor, if a bit clunky.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-30-2012, 01:31 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by link View Post
The downsides to the Coolpix and other inexpensive P&S cameras are that they usually produce only a .jpg file and the lenses are somewhat subject to flair and chromatic abortion. Look at the at the line the helmets make in the 3rd image, for example. The blue color at the edge is chromatic aberration. Also a lot of P&S cameras have a considerable lag between the time the shutter is pressed and the image is captured.

For an editor, check out Photoshop Elements. It’s inexpensive, sometimes given away with other programs, and does most things hobbyist do. It can sometimes be found on Ebay for next to nothing, or if you go to your local computer recycler, they will probably have several copies.

Also, Nikon cameras often come with ViewNX which isn’t a bad editor, if a bit clunky.
I didn't expect DSLR quality out of it, and bought it to be used as a replacement to the 8 year old Vivitar P&S my wife carries around. The quality of the pictures is MUCH better than the old camera. You're right about the lag, but it's not near as slow as the old camera.

This is one that I can hand to my kids to use and know that they aren't tearing up an expensive unit, and that they will have satisfactory results.

I've got 3 Sony EOS Rebel 35mm frames, and two lenses that I use to take better pictures for film. There's no way I'll let the kids use them without supervision...which is why I didn't get the DSLR.

I tried the editor that came with the Nikon, and wasn't impressed with it's usability. I'll try Gimp, and see how it goes.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-30-2012, 01:33 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
I figured that the $179 I paid for it, it should fit my needs quite well.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-30-2012, 01:55 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
I've got 3 Sony EOS Rebel 35mm frames, and two lenses that I use to take better pictures for film.
Sony? or Canon?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-30-2012, 02:07 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
Sony? or Canon?
Canon...I was looking at Sony DSLRs. My bad...thanks for pointing out the error.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:53 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
Canon...I was looking at Sony DSLRs. My bad...thanks for pointing out the error.
We've used several Canon P&S cameras with very good success. The distortion is minimal under most conditions and the camera can take photos that will be accepted by some of the major food photography sites. It's limited in the capability to gather sufficient light indoors and it's limited in the depth of field where the background needs to be blurred.

For $150. it's an unbelievable value and good for 98% of the folks who need digital photography.

I loathe spending $1K on the DSLR to get some slightly improved capabilities...........but that's the nature of photography. You pay significantly more to get incremental improvements.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-31-2012, 07:50 AM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
We've used several Canon P&S cameras with very good success. The distortion is minimal under most conditions and the camera can take photos that will be accepted by some of the major food photography sites. It's limited in the capability to gather sufficient light indoors and it's limited in the depth of field where the background needs to be blurred.

For $150. it's an unbelievable value and good for 98% of the folks who need digital photography.

I loathe spending $1K on the DSLR to get some slightly improved capabilities...........but that's the nature of photography. You pay significantly more to get incremental improvements.
I need to make a correction here...I thought the old camera was a Vivatar, but it's a Minolta. The Vivatar is the older first digital I bought, which I gave to the kids to use for taking pictures for school projects and for when they are out and about.


The distortion that was pointed out on the helmets was zoomed in from about 110' away. Being that far away, and that being the worse distortion in an action shot...Let's just say that I'm more than happy with the results for the cost.

Old camera Introduction price of $399 nine years ago

New camera
Introduction price of $279 last year

The old one served us well, and will continue to serve us as my wife's purse camera. The Nikon is the size of a medium SLR, and doesn't carry well as a pocket camera...unless you have VERY large pockets.

One of the major selling points to me was the ability to grab batteries anywhere...it uses normal AA batteries. I picked up some rechargeable batteries for it. But, just in case, I can go to the local corner store and pick up replacements if I forgot to charge them before leaving the house. That's happened before to me, but that's another story for another day.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-04-2012, 09:10 AM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
I was enjoying the morning on my back porch, and decided to take a few pictures...





5 points if you know what this is...an additional 50 it you still use it.

__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-04-2012, 02:13 PM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Paint.net is as near to photoshop as you can get without spending money and there are useful forums to help you learn to use the rich feature set. It is not at all wonky and they continually improve and upgrade it.

Paint.NET - Free Software for Digital Photo Editing


Last edited by Can't Know; 09-04-2012 at 02:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page