Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 04-14-2013, 07:30 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Onset MA
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
No. But you can say that at least it wasn't easy.

What do you suppose your insurance company would say if you car was stolen after you left the keys in it?
Maybe... They would have stolen it anyway??

Obviously making smart decisions in life greatly reduces your likelihood of being shot, but what if you have to walk by the shady dealer and his strung out clientele on your way home from school?
The only thing one could say with any honesty is "it wasn't as easy" if there was no safe. The degree of additional difficulty is arguable and subjective at best.

How are contracts with insurance companies like laws enforced by governments, compare apples and coconuts much?

Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 04-14-2013, 07:32 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
But Bot! You are trying to take away this liberals argument that the gooberment should come in your house and tell you how to lock things up in your own house.
Larry et al. The discussion was not that the government should do a damn thing.
MS started off with the pipe dream premise that it would be a good thing if attitudes surrounding the securing of firearms which are not directly in a person's possession could be altered to reflect a heightened sense of responsibility....
Guess we know the answer to that little concept.....

Even the mere suggestion that it would be kinda cool if people showed greater personal responsibility for securing their weapons, immediately gets the 'football bat' and 'keep the gooberment outta my house' crap.
Newsflash - you guys here are probably not the focus of the desire to see more responsible treatment of weapons -
Maybe Phil can enlighten us as to the demographic which could really use a basic course in gun responsibility...
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 04-14-2013, 07:35 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by FYVMMF View Post
The only thing one could say with any honesty is "it wasn't as easy" if there was no safe. The degree of additional difficulty is arguable and subjective at best.

How are contracts with insurance companies like laws enforced by governments, compare apples and coconuts much?
Indeed.

The comparison was in regards to personal liability for a stolen item.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 04-14-2013, 07:45 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Onset MA
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
Indeed.

The comparison was in regards to personal liability for a stolen item.
There can't be very much of a comparison, because there is very limited or no personal legal liability assignable to the owner of a stolen item used in the commision of a crime by another person.

Your imagining personal liability where it does not exist.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 04-14-2013, 07:46 PM
Dubyagee's Avatar
All fields are required
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE
Posts: 7,954
When we are regulated by the actions of the criminals than we have lost.

Here's an idea, how about removing slack judges that let these thieves and murderers right back out. How about the death penalty for using a stolen weapon in a crime resulting in injury. There is not a clear message being projected the judicial system.

What I do with my property within my property is not for discussion.
__________________
Satan creates nothing: he only ruins everything. He does not invent: he tampers. And his followers are no different ~ Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigaṇ
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 04-14-2013, 07:55 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
Larry et al. The discussion was not that the government should do a damn thing.
MS started off with the pipe dream premise that it would be a good thing if attitudes surrounding the securing of firearms which are not directly in a person's possession could be altered to reflect a heightened sense of responsibility....
Guess we know the answer to that little concept.....

Even the mere suggestion that it would be kinda cool if people showed greater personal responsibility for securing their weapons, immediately gets the 'football bat' and 'keep the gooberment outta my house' crap.
Newsflash - you guys here are probably not the focus of the desire to see more responsible treatment of weapons -
Maybe Phil can enlighten us as to the demographic which could really use a basic course in gun responsibility...
It's okay if the other person's freedom is attacked as long as I'm okay.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 04-14-2013, 09:20 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 57,711
When did guns get to be the equivalent of garden shears and base ball bats? It's a gun. It's is different by design and function. Semtex and C4 are not 4th of July fire crackers. Not sure why we are expected to treat guns the same as other objects.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 04-14-2013, 11:08 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Well it's like this: It's my life and my responsibility.

What else have you got?
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 04-15-2013, 09:07 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by FYVMMF View Post
There can't be very much of a comparison, because there is very limited or no personal legal liability assignable to the owner of a stolen item used in the commision of a crime by another person.

Your imagining personal liability where it does not exist.
Many imagine such personal liability, and see it as a next step in reducing inadvertent access to firearms by those who have no business with them.

I'd rather see these practices become mainstream by outreach and education than legislation.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 04-15-2013, 09:23 AM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
It's okay if the other person's freedom is attacked as long as I'm okay.
So you are of the belief that every gun owner treats their weapon with the respect and responsibility that it deserves?

Again, the OP was speaking of changing attitudes, not writing legislation.
You have gone from zero to soapbox in about 2 posts.... what's so difficult about even discussing this subject?
I truly believe that this type of failure to entertain a civil discussion is going to hasten the passage of more restrictive laws, because you put forth the appearance of unhinged zealot. Everyone loves to pass restrictive legislation against zealots...

And to deal with your comment more directly.... yes, apparently this is the modus operandi for the vast majority of citizens in our country, including the vocal 2A defenders. Wasn't until someone wanted to discuss possible restrictions on their toys that they started screaming. As long as they don't suffer any inconvenience, they will watch their Constitutional Rights get flushed one by one without so much as a whimper.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 04-15-2013, 10:52 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Well it's like this: It's my life and my responsibility.

What else have you got?

Personal responsibility? Sorry Bot, but that's something that a liberal could not comprehend in a MILLION years.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 04-15-2013, 10:56 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
So you are of the belief that every gun owner treats their weapon with the respect and responsibility that it deserves?

Again, the OP was speaking of changing attitudes, not writing legislation.
You have gone from zero to soapbox in about 2 posts.... what's so difficult about even discussing this subject?
I truly believe that this type of failure to entertain a civil discussion is going to hasten the passage of more restrictive laws, because you put forth the appearance of unhinged zealot. Everyone loves to pass restrictive legislation against zealots...

And to deal with your comment more directly.... yes, apparently this is the modus operandi for the vast majority of citizens in our country, including the vocal 2A defenders. Wasn't until someone wanted to discuss possible restrictions on their toys that they started screaming. As long as they don't suffer any inconvenience, they will watch their Constitutional Rights get flushed one by one without so much as a whimper.

Bot is INDEED carrying on a civil discussion. The problem is that as a liberal, you will NEVER understand the idea of personal responsibility and small government, if you were to concentrate on it 24/7 for the rest of your life.

Bot "gets it."
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 04-15-2013, 11:54 AM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 57,711
If explosives are required to be stored properly why not guns? Would everyone feel safe if explosives were just put behind a chain link fence on private property?
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 04-15-2013, 11:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,325
What a bunch you are. Hardly any reasonable approach at all.....


We have safe storage here; it's the law. Everyone with guns went out and bought a gun safe - big deal. Before this, guns were stored behind the back door or in plain sight. No ones rights were violated by having safe storage. The gun registry is history here - all you need is a licence.

Every 5 years I have to get a new free licence. To get one, I needed to fill out a form that asks enough questions that it would weed out problem types. My wife also had to sign it which is also an extra layer of vigalance. Most people with criminal records, mental problems, or anything that would trigger a '' yes '' on the form, probably decide not to even bother filling it out, I'd imagine.

We have some gun crime here but it's fairly low. Of those murders being done with hand guns, almost all of them are committed with ilegal weapons that are being smuggled into Canada from States along I75. Your problem has now become our problem so don't tell me I have no dog in this hunt.

It's beyond belielef that someone wouldn't take a proactive approach to safe gun ownership. It's goes even further that otherwise intellegent guys ( on this site ) would act like a bunch of DB's when it comes to simple little things like this.

You will get whatever laws you deserve in the end..............and you will blame everyone but yourselves.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 04-15-2013, 01:07 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
So you are of the belief that every gun owner treats their weapon with the respect and responsibility that it deserves?

Again, the OP was speaking of changing attitudes, not writing legislation.
You have gone from zero to soapbox in about 2 posts.... what's so difficult about even discussing this subject?
I truly believe that this type of failure to entertain a civil discussion is going to hasten the passage of more restrictive laws, because you put forth the appearance of unhinged zealot. Everyone loves to pass restrictive legislation against zealots...

And to deal with your comment more directly.... yes, apparently this is the modus operandi for the vast majority of citizens in our country, including the vocal 2A defenders. Wasn't until someone wanted to discuss possible restrictions on their toys that they started screaming. As long as they don't suffer any inconvenience, they will watch their Constitutional Rights get flushed one by one without so much as a whimper.
Way to paint everybody with the same brush!

I have never taken a gun poll to see what the proportion of safe handling is in the population. So I'll take your word for it.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page