PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   1 dead 14 wounded US Army base shooting (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=353064)

Dudesky 04-03-2014 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmbdiesel (Post 3311340)
Bullshlt.

DoD directive 5210.56 was signed into effect by Donald J Atwood in 1992, under the Bush I regime.
Here is the directive in .pdf form so you can maybe educate yourself.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf
You really gotta quit believing those emails.....:rolleyes:

This Is Why Most Military Personnel Aren’t Armed on Military Bases

ElChivito verified it for me.....:D

Dudesky 04-03-2014 10:18 PM

Appears Clinton didn't really reissue the directive either......GH did, it flew along under BC and then GW and was reissued sometime in 2011.

cmbdiesel 04-03-2014 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudesky (Post 3311478)
Appears Clinton didn't really reissue the directive either......GH did, it flew along under BC and then GW and was reissued sometime in 2011.

The directive was not issued by Bush I.
It was issued by Deputy Secretary Of Defense Donald Atwood.
Dick Cheney was SecDef.

You can make a claim that as CINC Bush I is ultimately responsible for the directive, but I don't think you can conclusively state that it was his policy.

Dudesky 04-03-2014 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmbdiesel (Post 3311488)
The directive was not issued by Bush I.
It was issued by Deputy Secretary Of Defense Donald Atwood.
Dick Cheney was SecDef.

You can make a claim that as CINC Bush I is ultimately responsible for the directive, but I don't think you can conclusively state that it was his policy.

I saw it that way.

Just because it was a DOD directive doesn't quite make it the Prez's thing but OTOH the issue came under him.....but when its said Clinton reissued it, that puts a whole different slant/flavor on it.

davidmash 04-03-2014 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudesky (Post 3311333)
Its Clinton :D

No he was not. It was H Bush. Sorry reality does not coincide with your fantasies.

Dudesky 04-03-2014 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3311505)
No he was not. It was H Bush. Sorry reality does not coincide with your fantasies.

Good point Davey....thanks for your input.....it wasn't H Bush either.....:rolleyes:

davidmash 04-03-2014 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dudesky (Post 3311509)
Good point Davey....thanks for your input.....it wasn't H Bush either.....:rolleyes:

Dept DoD is not an elected official. H Bush was Atwoods boss.

cmbdiesel 04-03-2014 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3311511)
Dept DoD is not an elected official. H Bush was Atwoods boss.

I'd blame Cheney.... he likes to be the only one shootin' other people...;)

Dudesky 04-03-2014 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3311511)
Dept DoD is not an elected official. H Bush was Atwoods boss.


Tell the poster in post #33 and #34 that.:D

Air&Road 04-04-2014 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3311505)
No he was not. It was H Bush. Sorry reality does not coincide with your fantasies.

And sorry, you obviously did not read all the posts before insulting the poster.

davidmash 04-04-2014 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmbdiesel (Post 3311513)
I'd blame Cheney.... he likes to be the only one shootin' other people...;)

That works for me. He is guilty of a lot of crap.

Air&Road 04-04-2014 01:30 PM

............. as are most ALL of the politicians in Washington, REGARDLESS of party affiliation.

chilcutt 04-04-2014 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by INSIDIOUS (Post 3311045)
Well then stop yer agitating :)

The U.S. Embassy here has their own way of spying on it's citizens. If I spend too much time on the BWOT forum, my computer goes haywire. S'pose it is their way of letting me know they can 'Reach out and Touch me'..at any time.;)

chilcutt 04-04-2014 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Air&Road (Post 3311107)
I THINK that the time of your post that I see is EST. The event occurred at 4:58PM CST. Not too much of a lag between occurrence and your post.

My real time is 12 hours ahead of Michigan time. Since I have not seen anything else about this incident on newscasts here, was just wondering if there is any other new news about this incident,,or if intell is still being gathered.

INSIDIOUS 04-05-2014 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chilcutt (Post 3311960)
The U.S. Embassy here has their own way of spying on it's citizens. If I spend too much time on the BWOT forum, my computer goes haywire. S'pose it is their way of letting me know they can 'Reach out and Touch me'..at any time.;)

Now that is funny stuff. Who is letting you know?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website