![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
interpretation of emission test
recently had my 90 300te 4matic smog tested.im happy to report it easily passed.however i did a comparison of the results with a previous done 2 years ago and noticed the following.at idle the HC was 128ppm vs 91 ppm on previous(limit 200) co% was .05 vs .01 on previous(limit 1%).the vehicle was also tested at 2500 rpm. HC was 71 ppm vs 36 ppm previous and co% .28 vs .01 previous.this seems like a sizeable increase in pollutants.anything to worry about here?could this be sign of a catalytic convertor going south?if there are any emissions experts out there please chime in
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
As catalysts age their efficiency declines. Catalyst aging is a complex phenomenom, but time at high temperature and contamination such as combustion byproducts from some motor oil additives will slowly reduce their efficiency. As a rule, aged catalysts require higher temperature to achieve a given level of potential catalytic reactions, and catalyst temperature at the beginning of the emission test varies based on "conditioning" - i.e was the car tested immediately after coming in from a spirited drive? Did it idle extensively before the test? Was it shut down while waiting?
Anything you can do to increase catayst temperature on an aged catalyst will enhance catalytic reaction. Drive the car briskly to fully warm up the catalyst and have the test run at an establishement were there is minimum waiting time. NEVER just leave your car somewhere and pick it up later. An few hours "air bath" followed by a startup and a few miniutes of idling before the test starts is recipe for failure! While waiting, keep engine revs at 1500-2000 and load the engine up by turning on the A/C or Defrost (which will engage the A/C compressor) , and NEVER shut it down before the test. On a modern O2 sensor car, catalyst efficiency can be determined by the amount of O2 in the exhaust (assuming the Lamda system is functioning properly). If it's zero then essentially all potential oxidation reactions are occuring. Any measureable O2 in the exhaust means that not all oxidation reactions are being catalyzed, and a hotter catalyst will usually consume more of the available O2, which will reduce HC and CO. High temperatures are required for the catalyst to perform, but aging accelerates at high temperature, so it's a double edge sword. Catalyst life varies greatly with catalyst technology and operating conditions, but most will last in the 100-150K range before they are so degraded that they cannot pass field emission test limits. Does your current and prvious test reports include exhaust O2 content? Duke |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
testing here in my part of ontario is only for the 2 gases mentioned.im curious though.what does the o2 stand for?pardon my knowledge of chemistry.
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
O2 is the chemical formula for normal diatomic oxygen molecules in the atmosphere. Also, exhaust oxygen sensors are often abbreviated "O2 sensor".
Duke |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Don't worry about it.
My understanding is that the " Drive Clean " program will probably be abolished in the next 2 years. It has PROVEN to be nothing but a rip-off anyway, and nobody ( participants/operators ) wants to spend the megabucks required to move on to the next phase, which is much more complicated, i.e. expensive equipment required. ![]()
__________________
2007 C 230 Sport. ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
For instance, my pick-up truck is tested for it, my car is not. ![]()
__________________
2007 C 230 Sport. ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M103 Emission Test Insight | Duke2.6 | Tech Help | 5 | 06-10-2006 12:16 AM |
California Smog Test rip-off??? | BENZ-LGB | Off-Topic Discussion | 14 | 02-24-2005 12:45 AM |
What is good to be done before the Emission Test? | andrew1413 | Tech Help | 10 | 05-27-2004 05:45 PM |
Failed emission test on 87 MB 190E 8V! Help please! | jeff-abalone | Tech Help | 6 | 04-24-2004 12:21 PM |
CT diesel emission test | 84300DT | Diesel Discussion | 8 | 03-02-2002 02:29 PM |