|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hi guys can you give me a good comparison with this 2 beautifiul car in terms of durability, performance,etc.Is 3 series using vacuum on a/c, central door lock? I had a bad experience troubleshooting a vacuum leak on my 190e(That's what I don't like in mercedes It's hard to troubleshoot a vacum leak when the car is getting old).What are the Pros and Cons.Thanks
Ron 93 190 2.6 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
From the post title, I am assuming you are comparing a W202 C Class to a same year 3 series BMW.
To me what makes an MB better than a BMW is long term durability, but I drive 60,000 miles per year and need the car to still be in good shape with several 100,000 miles on it. An MB is almost always superior to a BMW in this category. But if you are the average driver, you only drive 13,000 miles per year, making this a category that is not as important. In the case of the 202, performance and handling wise, it is a dog compared to an equivalent 3 series BMW. If you need the long term durability and drive a lot, the MB would be a better long term choice. If you want a nice driving C Class that will compare favorably, as well as offering long term durability, the 203 is the ticket. Good luck, |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry,Im talking about 6 cylinder.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wal Mart lawsuit...nonsense or not? | mikemover | Off-Topic Discussion | 11 | 07-02-2004 03:45 AM |
Autocrossing a 400E and 300TE | 400ERACER | Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock | 9 | 06-05-2004 02:50 PM |
Concours pics including our class winning 300TE | Greg in Oz | Off-Topic Discussion | 4 | 09-29-2003 04:42 AM |
C Class manual transmission definitely C class | Trinity | Tech Help | 8 | 04-05-2001 08:56 PM |
1995 C class wheels on a 1991 E class? | CJ | Mercedes-Benz Wheels & Tires | 4 | 11-26-2000 09:36 PM |