Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 07-01-2009, 08:47 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,428
Got it, thanks!

Makes sense... Ill have it evacuated and repressurized to 30-40psi, I guess?

So moisture + R12 oil = acid (potentially). But what is the consequence of R134a + R12 oil? Or, R134a+R12+R12oil?

I assume that since HC is miscible in the R12 mineral oil, that if that was used to "top up", that wouldn't be a big deal.

Also, say the R12 in there IS contaminated with HC or 134a, what is the correct procedure to collect it? It seems that the shops recover and perhaps resell clean refrigerant that they obtain. However, if it is contaminated, Im sure they still need to collect it, not just vent it to the atmosphere. Do they typically have a dedicated "catch can" for the refrigerant, or do they do something else?

Thanks!

__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-01-2009, 09:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,057
Wow they really got you guys by the short and curlies with this AC fear mongering stuff. HC refrigerant can be safely mixed with either R12 or R134 but it's illegal to do so. No AC shop will want to touch it or they will charge you an arm and a leg to have it 'evacuated and safely disposed of'. If the car was converted to R134 by a shop then the rubber hoses had to be changed to barrier type, as required by law. If the hoses look old and crusty with lots of MB PNs all around then chances are your system was never converted. Whatever you do, don't have it converted to R134. Your wallet will hate you and the AC perfomance will be pathetic.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-01-2009, 11:12 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,428
I know that part fully. Ive gone through the full set of experiences on my w123s.

The best plan to deal with my unknown situation is what is important to me here... I want to go in as a fully educated customer.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-01-2009, 01:09 PM
I told you so!
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Motor City, MI
Posts: 2,855
I imagine that a mix of r12 and r134 will mess up the phase changes (i.e., liquid to vapor) needed for a/c to work efficiently. Then there's the issue of oil compatibility. Some oils are compatible with both refrigerants. Most aren't. Compatibility means that the refrigerant will carry oil and circulate it throughout the system. Otherwise the oil just sits at the low spots and doesn't lubricate.

Converting to HC refrigerants is legal in many states. But it can only be done on r134 systems. It cannot be done directly from r12. An r12 system must first be converted to r134 (with proper quick disconnect fittings), and only then may it be converted to HC (at least that's your story when the a/c police ask you about it).
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-01-2009, 05:31 PM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Putting any other refrigerant BESIDES R134a in a system having R134a fittings is a violation of Federal law.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-02-2009, 02:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,057
The AC police is coming to take you away!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-02-2009, 09:12 AM
I told you so!
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Motor City, MI
Posts: 2,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
Putting any other refrigerant BESIDES R134a in a system having R134a fittings is a violation of Federal law.
No, it is not a violation of federal law. It is a violation of state law where you live (Texas), but it is allowed where JHZR2 and I live (New Jersey and Michigan).

http://www.epa.gov/Ozone/snap/refrigerants/hc12alng.html#q9
__________________
95 E320 Cabriolet, 169K
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-03-2009, 12:03 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,428
Evacuated, refilled with R12, now very frosty. The delta was about 2 lbs on a 2.9 lb system. Works great. Compressor cycles much more gently, and when the system is running, no hissing in the lines (indicative I guess of a phase change where there is not supposed to be one due to low pressure?). Held solid vacuum for over 30 minutes.

Will overhaul the system later this summer - wanted to get on the road with cool air.

No indication of 134a, and they evacuated the system no problem. Told me that lots of mechanics just charge some 134a onto R12 because it works to some extent. Not legal or right, just what they have seen done before. Kind of like a real lousy conversion, but where some R12 is in there (I suppose to keep the oil moving).

Anyway, it works beautifully.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-03-2009, 07:12 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kestas View Post
No, it is not a violation of federal law. It is a violation of state law where you live (Texas), but it is allowed where JHZR2 and I live (New Jersey and Michigan).

http://www.epa.gov/Ozone/snap/refrigerants/hc12alng.html#q9
I did not say that it was a violation of Federal law to USE other refrigerants. I said that it was a violation if you used other than R134a with R134a fittings installed. By Federal Law you are supposed to have the fittings installed that are appropriate for the refrigerant contained in the system. Additionally the system is supposed to be labeled.

This law is probably broken more often than the speed limit, but it is the law.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-03-2009, 07:15 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHZR2 View Post
Evacuated, refilled with R12, now very frosty. The delta was about 2 lbs on a 2.9 lb system. Works great. Compressor cycles much more gently, and when the system is running, no hissing in the lines (indicative I guess of a phase change where there is not supposed to be one due to low pressure?). Held solid vacuum for over 30 minutes.

Will overhaul the system later this summer - wanted to get on the road with cool air.

No indication of 134a, and they evacuated the system no problem. Told me that lots of mechanics just charge some 134a onto R12 because it works to some extent. Not legal or right, just what they have seen done before. Kind of like a real lousy conversion, but where some R12 is in there (I suppose to keep the oil moving).

Anyway, it works beautifully.
OUTSTANDING!

In the future, don't even think about going away from R12 no matter what maladies might occur. You will always be better off repairing whatever goes wrong and staying with R12. R12 is now $20 to $30 a pound. Not that much more to keep the system working well while eliminating the chances of problems of conversion ill effects.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-03-2009, 10:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
I did not say that it was a violation of Federal law to USE other refrigerants. I said that it was a violation if you used other than R134a with R134a fittings installed. By Federal Law you are supposed to have the fittings installed that are appropriate for the refrigerant contained in the system. Additionally the system is supposed to be labeled.

This law is probably broken more often than the speed limit, but it is the law.
I read the law differently. Those are rulings (which carry the force of law) are the SNAP rules, which restrict replacement of ozone-depleting refrigerants.

If you are converting FROM 134a, you do not need to change fittings. At least, that's my reading of it. It's pretty much impossible to change the fittings on a factory-134a system, and I don't see anything about converting a converted system, as long as the original 134a conversion is not a "sham" conversion.

I'm not a lawyer and certainly not a judge though.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-03-2009, 02:36 PM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's been a LONG time since I did my 609 test, but at that time I did read all the stuff, not just enough to pass the test. I can't tell you where in all that reading it was specified, but it was clear that the fitting had to reflect the refrigerant inside.

As I said before, no one pays any attention to these laws.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-03-2009, 03:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
As I said before, no one pays any attention to these laws.
How true this is. And this is a good reason to never touch a system unless you trust the owner, and the owner has a complete knowledge of the prior service done to his system. Or buy a refrigerant identifier. That's one tool that I do not own.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-03-2009, 05:07 PM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't have a refrigerant identifier either. That's why I just refuse to recover anything into my machines unless I REALLY know and trust who I'm talking to.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-03-2009, 08:47 PM
I told you so!
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Motor City, MI
Posts: 2,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
I did not say that it was a violation of Federal law to USE other refrigerants. I said that it was a violation if you used other than R134a with R134a fittings installed. By Federal Law you are supposed to have the fittings installed that are appropriate for the refrigerant contained in the system. Additionally the system is supposed to be labeled.

This law is probably broken more often than the speed limit, but it is the law.
Aren't R134 fittings the proper ones to use for HC refrigerant?

__________________
95 E320 Cabriolet, 169K
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page