|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HR Springs Backordered - Eibach Pro? or Wait.
Hi - I ordered some HR springs from someone who said they had a set left in stock, now it looks like that isn't the case. The only other set of springs I can find are the eibach pro springs, I don't know what the ride height drop is compared to stock, or even if they are as good or better than the HR springs. Wonder if it's worth waiting, or just getting the Eibach.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I’d just lop a coil off the stock springs and call it a day
__________________
1993 e300 1995 e320 1994 e320 2006 s500 4matic 2004 Jeep wj overland 2001 Ducati 748 2004 Honda shadow aero |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Would the stock springs with a coil cut be any stiffer?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Very little on stiffness. Would still feel like 95 percent of a stock, just lower
__________________
1993 e300 1995 e320 1994 e320 2006 s500 4matic 2004 Jeep wj overland 2001 Ducati 748 2004 Honda shadow aero |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OK - I think that's probably not the direction I want to go. Anyone have insight on the eibach?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
it's difficult to quantify the differences because it can be a 'felt' issue with one's
butt. however, I will try. folks often have competing desires for lowering their ride and then struggle with comfort, ride ability, handling, clearance etc I have no experience with HR. I first tried Vogtland and felt the ride was too harsh so I sold them. I also tried cutting one full coil off and felt that was too harsh. I ended up with Eibach and they (to me) had a good balance between firmness vs comfort and handling. I paired the Eibach's first with Koni yellow body (3-settings) shocks but the firmest setting was too soft to control the body rolling when pushed into fast sweepers (e.g. freeway off ramp). I settled for the Bilstein HD, then Sport for my w210 RWD, both of which shared the same dampening rates but the Sport was an inch shorter. The valving characteristics were clearly firmer than the Konis and I liked the balance of the Eibach/Bilstein and stayed with them. The final result was very little body roll and about 1.5" lower on #2 pads... while still retaining a firm and acceptable comfort on the freeway. Driven on poor roads and transiting over railroad crossings, you are reminded you have firmly dampened shocks as the vibration passes through your car seat, to your butt, and up your spine (though not painfully so). When the car is fully loaded with passengers, the added weight of roughly 1000 lbs reveal the limits of a lowered ride. Care must be taken when switching from level pavement to steep inclines. As such, I rarely load up with more than 3 and will reach for the keys of a different family car. The 210 is my guilty pleasure ride and my only auto transmission vehicle. anyway, anecdotal from one owner
__________________
-- raymond~ 47º 34'N 122º 18'W |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
All well for the moment after a very pleasant, 450 km drive to Paris yesterday. RayH |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You got that backwards there big shoots. Stiffness increases as the number of coils decreases because physics. Take a 100lb/in spring with 10 coils, lop off one coil, now you have a 111lb/in spring. Take off another coil and you have 124.875lb/in spring.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Lol ok He asked if the springs were stiffer and I said not really. Don’t need a physics degree for that
__________________
1993 e300 1995 e320 1994 e320 2006 s500 4matic 2004 Jeep wj overland 2001 Ducati 748 2004 Honda shadow aero |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Except they are stiffed.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words |
Bookmarks |
|
|