Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion > Alternative Fuels

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-23-2009, 03:53 PM
JEBalles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carlisle, MA
Posts: 1,225
How Does WVO Affect My 616 Engine?

I wanna hear from every chipper charlie to every debbie downer about the ups and downs of WVO in the 240D engine (which includes things like IP) on a two-tank conversion. I have not tested my oil for anything and gravity filter down to 5 microns.
__________________
1983 240D 3.0T 4-speed manual, now sold

1989 Subaru GL Wagon 5-speed Touring Edition
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:06 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Think this thread could be considered trolling?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:06 PM
diametricalbenz's Avatar
The Crowbar of Embriage
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,512
Debbie Downer - I ruined a set of injectors by running on 100% WVO in 90F heat and then the fuel congealed in the IP causing me to strand the car at Santa Monica Beach Pier overnight. I got the car running the next day but man it nailed like crazy after that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:08 PM
Alastair's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Wales U.K.
Posts: 1,064
All depends on the way you Dry your oil, and prepare it for use as a motor-fuel...

All WVO contains Moisture, FFA and other nasties. Most nasties can be Filtered out by filtering to 1 micron...

However, FFA and Moisture Cannot.....

FFA = Free-Fatty-Acid. This is an acidic type of oil.....

FFA will turn Moisture Acidic.....

This will over time destroy the high-pressure pumping elements in the fuel pump...(Expensive to replace)

FFA Without Moisture is fairly innocuous...(Banning Moisture completely is nerly impossible due to tank condensation issues etc. Veggy-oil is mildly hygroscopic, meaning it likes to absorb a certain amount of water from the air......)

This is why its VERY important to Properly DRY the oil before it get anywhere near any car fuel-tank...

Providing the oil is prepared for motor use PROPERLY then there are no real issues. --Not even a twin-tank needed, providing winter-temps dont drop too much below 0 deg C-- IF the Engine and Injection-System is prepared properly, Unfortunately this Seldom done--

(A 'Twin-Tank' is good for 'feel-good' factor but if the oil is crap, then so is the life-expectancy of the fuel-system...)
__________________
http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...0TDnoplate.jpg

Alastair AKA H.C.II South Wales, U.K. based member

W123, 1985 300TD Wagon, 256K,
-Most recent M.B. purchase, Cost-a-plenty, Gulps BioDiesel extravagantly, and I love it like an old dog.

W114, 1975 280E Custard Yellow,
-Great above decks needs chassis welding--Really will do it this year....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:22 PM
JEBalles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carlisle, MA
Posts: 1,225
Well, I won't be altering my injection system and it does drop rather far below 0 degrees centigrade here in Massachusetts some nights, so I think I will keep my twin-tanker. As for water, though, what is the best way to remove it?
__________________
1983 240D 3.0T 4-speed manual, now sold

1989 Subaru GL Wagon 5-speed Touring Edition
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:36 PM
79Mercy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,131
Your going to kill your motor. Just run it on diesel, thats what it was designed for. I have seen to many old MB diesels ruined by people using WVO. In fact last month my buddy and I were trying to get a 1980 300TD with 200K running, the PO had run it on WVO and had ruined the motor. The compression was about 150-200PSI in all 5 cylinders, motor was toast..
__________________
1985 300TD Turbo Euro-wagon
1979 280CE 225,200 miles
1985 300D Turbo 264,000 miles
1976 240D 190,000 miles
1979 300TD 220,000

GONE but not forgotten
1976 300D 195,300 miles
1983 300D Turbo 175,000 miles

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...e485-1-2-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:41 PM
JEBalles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carlisle, MA
Posts: 1,225
How can you be sure that that WVO caused that low compression? How would it? And, although these engines were designed to run on mineral diesel, I'm sure you've heard, the original diesel engine designed by Rudolph Diesel ran on peanut oil. I'm just trying to get all the facts here.
__________________
1983 240D 3.0T 4-speed manual, now sold

1989 Subaru GL Wagon 5-speed Touring Edition
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2009, 05:12 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEBalles View Post
How can you be sure that that WVO caused that low compression? How would it? And, although these engines were designed to run on mineral diesel, I'm sure you've heard, the original diesel engine designed by Rudolph Diesel ran on peanut oil. I'm just trying to get all the facts here.
So you think that a diesel engine designed by MB 50+ years later is exactly like the low output plant oil engine that Rudolf Diesel built? It was engineered to be run on diesel fuel! WVO was never intended to be run through these engines, they are very precise, and junky nasty fuel will only cause wear and damage. Why even bother with diesel so cheap now? Run it on what its meant to run on!

Its your $$ when you wreck your motor.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-23-2009, 07:16 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEBalles View Post
And, although these engines were designed to run on mineral diesel, I'm sure you've heard, the original diesel engine designed by Rudolph Diesel ran on peanut oil. I'm just trying to get all the facts here.
The FACT is Rudolph Diesel had absolutely nothing to do with the design or development of your engine.

FYI, his first engine ran on Coal Dust.

Quote:
Alright, negative nancy, so is properly refined WVO still "junky nasty" fuel?
Yes, completely. It still contains fats, acids and contaminants that simple filtering and settling can never remove. The Biodiesel process removes all that.

Quote:
I also don't fancy to see what little money I have going into the pockets of those damn oil sheiks.
The city has this little invention called Public Transit, you might look into it. I bet you'll be surprised to find it can actually work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah-kay View Post
environmentally friendly
Besides the increased smog emissions, increased engine wear, increased fuel consumption, shorter service intervals (oil contamination), shorter vehicle lifespan, lower resale value and improper disposal of waste oil, yeah, its "environmentally friendly".
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-23-2009, 09:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
FYI, his first engine ran on Coal Dust.
Wrong.........it never ran on coal dust, it blew the f#$k up on coal duat
__________________
81 Mercedes 300SD 289k.......SOLD
82 Mercedes 300CD 252k......slow ride

82 mercedes 300 SD...mi Unknown
83 Mercedes 300D ????ksniff..gone too
84 Mercedes 300D 148k........SOLD
85 Mercedes 300TD 386k and holding some one elses project
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-23-2009, 09:32 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackG View Post
Wrong.........it never ran on coal dust, it blew the f#$k up on coal duat
Incorrect, it did run. It was deemed unfeasible to develop due to technology limitations of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-24-2009, 07:56 AM
Alastair's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Wales U.K.
Posts: 1,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
The FACT is Rudolph Diesel had absolutely nothing to do with the design or development of your engine.

FYI, his first engine ran on Coal Dust.


Yes, completely. It still contains fats, acids and contaminants that simple filtering and settling can never remove. The Biodiesel process removes all that.


The city has this little invention called Public Transit, you might look into it. I bet you'll be surprised to find it can actually work.


Besides the increased smog emissions, increased engine wear, increased fuel consumption, shorter service intervals (oil contamination), shorter vehicle lifespan, lower resale value and improper disposal of waste oil, yeah, its "environmentally friendly".

Forced Induction--

Well, Here's a first... We agree on summit and on the subject of WVO....

(Apart from the increased emissions comment. A PROPERLY set-up engine--Rarely done-- has on average Half the emissions found when same engine run on std. diesel--But, still not as good as Proper BioDiesel fuel....)

Used-cooking-oil will Never be as good as Proper BioDiesel in any engine,--Except maybe the three-pot Elsbett engine specially made for it...

Yes, I have an engine thats done 80 odd K on WVO--possibly more,, I still have the engine--the car fell apart round it. Engine however, is still fine, with good compression numbers so I have kept it and scrapped the car....

Fuel-System Preparation is Essential (This includes Injector work and Timing Alterations....)--if you value the engine and intend to use Veggy-Oil, whether Fresh,-- Or dare I say it, WVO for more than a few K....

Veggy-Oil Burns at a Different Rate, acts differently in the injection system dynamically, and also changes its characteristic from stone-cold to full running temps. These issue MUST be addressed to allow trouble-free operation. A simple DIY Twin-Tank or kit just don't cut it, only helps somewhat.....

FFA's contained in WVO Cannot be filtered out. FFA's are Acidic--Yes, they do burn extremely well--in fact, prolly better than BioDiesel or Std. nos 1, and in some unrelated research, I have run an engine on near pure FFA derived from WVO Bio-Glyc.--Not an M.B.--a Pug XUD9-TE-- (FFA ends up in the glyc. phase as soaps that can be split off by acidulation at a later process stage....)

The Average-content of FFA in used-cooking-oil is between 7 and 12%

However, the FFA's in waste-oil make moisture acidic--Yes, Its possible to neutralise the FFA in used-oil--But Such a PITA to do Properly, And you lose half of your feedstock, so is nearly never done!.

To Properly De-Water, arrange a tank with a circulating-pump, and a heater, (Take all necessary precautions with elect. heating so as to cut power if oil level should fall for whatever reason. Explosions/fires are the result of leaks without safety interlocks/level switches). Arrange a ducted fan to push air through the closed top of the vessel and out to a separate vent. Heat to 100-120 degrees C, while circulating oil. Place spray-head on oil return in top of vessel to increase oil surface-area to air and speed drying...

Over 10 years and more, I have used VWO. But I found in the end, the needed effort to clean, dry and make GOOD outta WVO was almost as much effort as making a Proper and Recognised fuel!!

Hence, I now make BioDiesel, which is 100 times better than just some old veggy from the local chippy filtered through 'J' cloths or bed-sheets that some guys use!

With regards to the 'Old' M.B. manual illustrated earlier with the text including use of Veggy-Oil, (Fresh, NOT Used Cooking-Oil) Looking at the design of the engine, its not fundamentally different from the OM-61x series. It has the 'proper M.B.' type Pre-Chamber and Pintle type injector.....

BTW, That old chestnut of 'Dr Rudy' his engine and the peanut oil, I am just SO sick of hearing......

(If I had drink for every time I have heard some hippy-type say That, I would be a hopeless alcoholic......)

His engine Prototype built at the M.A.N. works, ran on Coal-Dust....

The whole Peanut-oil thing--That was done Purely for POLITICAL reasons.
Exhibition was in Paris, France......
France had Many Colonies. These colonies included many that grew Peanuts and similar crops that could be used to make oils--so lets put That one to bed.........
__________________
http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...0TDnoplate.jpg

Alastair AKA H.C.II South Wales, U.K. based member

W123, 1985 300TD Wagon, 256K,
-Most recent M.B. purchase, Cost-a-plenty, Gulps BioDiesel extravagantly, and I love it like an old dog.

W114, 1975 280E Custard Yellow,
-Great above decks needs chassis welding--Really will do it this year....

Last edited by Alastair; 03-24-2009 at 08:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-24-2009, 09:16 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alastair View Post
His engine Prototype built at the M.A.N. works, ran on Coal-Dust....
Also, the air injection system (blast injection) used on very early engines was a remnant design used for injecting coal dust into the cylinder.

Those of you so fond of comparing Dr. Diesel's engine to Mercedes, watch this video and point out anything you find in common.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9r_RqQbMpQ

Last edited by ForcedInduction; 03-24-2009 at 09:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:46 PM
79Mercy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,131
The car was run on WVO for 1 year and then it started running really bad and then one day it wouldn't start. To be honest I have no proof that it was the WVO but why else would a perfectly good car loose all its compression in 1 year. The car only had 200K on it.

I assume it ruined the valve seals causing the low compression.
__________________
1985 300TD Turbo Euro-wagon
1979 280CE 225,200 miles
1985 300D Turbo 264,000 miles
1976 240D 190,000 miles
1979 300TD 220,000

GONE but not forgotten
1976 300D 195,300 miles
1983 300D Turbo 175,000 miles

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...e485-1-2-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-23-2009, 04:53 PM
JEBalles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Carlisle, MA
Posts: 1,225
What about all those people with 30,000-50,000 miles logged on WVO? Maybe the previous owner didn't take the necessary actions to properly run the engine on WVO?
__________________
1983 240D 3.0T 4-speed manual, now sold

1989 Subaru GL Wagon 5-speed Touring Edition
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page