![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Why Do MB's and Volvos not seem quite as prone to rust as the US auto makers
Seems like you regularly see rust free Volvos (probably more than MB's) and MB's from the early 80's to early 90's.
At the same time you see 10 year old GM trucks with cab corners rusted out regularly Fords aren't much better. It's interesting. I shouldn't say MB's are immune. Seems like the bottoms of doors rot out due to window weather stripping rot or worse yet missing. Seems like GM's and Fords are much more prone to rust though. I wonder what they're doing wrong in comparison.
__________________
-E300d '99 350k -Suburban '93 220k -TDI Jetta '03 350k Sold -F250 '96 7.3 -Dodge Ram 12V -E320 '95 200k -E320 Wagon 1994 155k -300d Turbo '87 187k miles -E320 1994 200k -300d Turbo '84 245k (sold to Dan62) -300d Turbo '84 180k -300sd '80 300k -7.3 Powerstroke Diesel 15P Van 500k+ miles -190d '89 Non Turbo 2.5 5cyl 240k (my first MB) Tom's Imports of Columbia MO Ruined the IP in changing leaky delivery valve O-Rings - Refused to stand behind his work. Mid-MO MB drivers-AVOID Tom's. |
Bookmarks |
|
|