Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2004, 01:02 PM
Coming back from burnout
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: in the Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,274
Anyone remember the 70's GM diesels for cars?

At lunch time today I think I was told a FISH TALE. I was told when GM built its diesels during the energy crises that they converted standard gasoline engine blocks and heads to diesel use.. how could this be possible, for one, how did they they do the Fuel Pump/Injector thing and two 180 psi and 400 psi are quite a ways between..Was this in fact a FISH TALE? I am searching Google right now..Also i was told their was a Chevette Diesel and a Ford Ranger Diesel and that Nissan even put them in pickups..is this also true?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2004, 01:06 PM
123c
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrameow
..Also i was told their was a Chevette Diesel and a Ford Ranger Diesel and that Nissan even put them in pickups..is this also true?
This is true, i've seen an example of each, others here will know more about them than I...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2004, 01:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 2,145
Where have you been? This has been covered here quite a few times. Yes GM converted an Olds 350 gasser to diesel by beefing up the block but it had different heads, timing cover, etc. to accept the IP and other parts. The reason for this "conversion" was an attempt at a simple diesel option since the Olds V8 would bolt into any GM RWD chassis of the time with relative ease. The Olds 350/5.7 diesel had many problems. Blown headgaskets, IP issues, etc. It is often confused with the GM 6.2-6.5 diesel but the 6.2/6.5 is a completely different engine and shares no parts or history with the Olds. Yes Chevettes, Chevy LUV (isuzu), Rangers, Lincolns, Nissans, Mitsubishi and even International Harvestor's Scout have all offered diesel engines at one time or another. They are all pretty rare as US buyers have never seemed to care for diesels. Fuel has always been too cheap. Until now. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops!
84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K
03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K
93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2004, 01:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: RI shore
Posts: 2,937
All basically true except the GM 350 diesel was changed a bit. They put in roller cams and probably some minor mods to the block, but it was pretty down and dirty. The results were legendary. Hey, I remember chevette diesels, bet that's a rare car today!
__________________
'82 300SD - 361K mi - "Blue"

"Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement."

listen, look, .........and duck.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2004, 01:40 PM
Clatterpastor
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 280
Diesel "transplants"

The Chevette had the Isuzu supplied 4 cyl. diesel that was a pretty good little motor. The Ranger/Mazda pickups shared a Mazda-built 4 cyl. with the Escort, Tempo/Topaz, and even a 626. The Internationals (Scout, Traveler, etc.) used the Nissan-built 6 cyl. that was also found in Maximas. All pretty good motors but the only one I ever wanted was the Maxima diesel. Passed on one with a 5 spd. that should have come home with me years ago.
__________________
Rick
Avid Benz watcher

Previously owned 126's: 2 1981 300SD's, 1987 300SDL, 1991 350SDL,
Previously owned 123's: 1978 300D, 1983 240D, 1985 300D
Previously owned 124: 1994 320TE

Currently:
2004 Toyota Sequoia SR5 206k
2010 Ford Edge 122k
Always looking for the next MB diesel!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:12 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrameow
At lunch time today I think I was told a FISH TALE. I was told when GM built its diesels during the energy crises that they converted standard gasoline engine blocks and heads to diesel use.. how could this be possible, for one, how did they they do the Fuel Pump/Injector thing and two 180 psi and 400 psi are quite a ways between..Was this in fact a FISH TALE? I am searching Google right now..Also i was told their was a Chevette Diesel and a Ford Ranger Diesel and that Nissan even put them in pickups..is this also true?

First off, they were not converted gas engines.....

the early ones had problems and they finally fixed them but the reputation was ruined.

The biggest problem was head bolts would stretch and blow gasket. People would continue to drive on them and warp the head....rendering it junch.

Brother ran 250,000 trouble free miles on his Olds 88 Royale.....before he popped a gasket due to using ether to start it not understanding glow plug issues.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:15 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Burton
All basically true except the GM 350 diesel was changed a bit. They put in roller cams and probably some minor mods to the block, but it was pretty down and dirty. The results were legendary. Hey, I remember chevette diesels, bet that's a rare car today!
Pete , Buick, Olds and Chevy all had their own Unique 350 (5.7) motors....

Where the diesel block can be remachined to use gasser parts its not a gasser block....

anyway block and crank issues were not its weakness it was headbolts that weren't strong enough
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oregon
Posts: 135
I had two brothers and several freinds running these diesels in late 70's early 80's. Cutless Supreme, Regal, and maybe Monte Carlo had diesels. I moved away and never knew of what their demise was. My brothers never spoke of them again and assume they had a bad experience.
__________________
Whoever dies with the most toys......Wins!

1984 300d
165k miles
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Saugus, CA USA
Posts: 2,042
Their intent was good, they tried to make a diesel run like a gasser. The problem was that there is a good reason diesels run like diesels, so they will stay together. They had also just gotten bit by the rotary engine, they had done a study and concluded it couldn't be built reliably, then Mazda came out with there's, seemingly proving them wrong.

I heard a story about the first attempt. The engineers took a 350 block, put a 455 (I think) crank in to get the compression up, and put a diesel fuel pump on it. The first attempt at starting it took place just before lunch. As soon as it fired it blew up and made a mess of the engine lab. They called their maintenance to clean it up and then went home for the day.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:33 PM
michael cole's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: waterloo ontario
Posts: 730
despite their weaknesses these were some smooth running diesel cars.too bad relatively small issues like like headbolts could not be worked out.i guess the buying public could not be that patient
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:47 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Anderson
Their intent was good, they tried to make a diesel run like a gasser. The problem was that there is a good reason diesels run like diesels, so they will stay together. They had also just gotten bit by the rotary engine, they had done a study and concluded it couldn't be built reliably, then Mazda came out with there's, seemingly proving them wrong.

I heard a story about the first attempt. The engineers took a 350 block, put a 455 (I think) crank in to get the compression up, and put a diesel fuel pump on it. The first attempt at starting it took place just before lunch. As soon as it fired it blew up and made a mess of the engine lab. They called their maintenance to clean it up and then went home for the day.
I'd like to know how a big block crank (455) fit in a small block engine. (350).........
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:48 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by michael cole
despite their weaknesses these were some smooth running diesel cars.too bad relatively small issues like like headbolts could not be worked out.i guess the buying public could not be that patient
they did, but it was too late by then.................they would stretch, not break.....but end result was the same.

by then they had the bad rep.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:50 PM
Coming back from burnout
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: in the Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,274
I really thought it was a fish tale...

I am not that old!! Actually now that I know the story, it did make sense, and it wasnt bad engineering. Probably with a few more design and production iterations, the problems wouldve gone away and they would've achieved greatness, which is the way engineering works, sometimes in the 24th hour, it all comes together wonderfully, but hours 1 to 23 are filled with horrific mistakes, sometimes thats they way my project cars worked out...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-29-2004, 02:53 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
You can still get remanufactured motors for these, and they have all the issues sorted out.....but how many cars remain in good enoug condition for a transplant.....
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-29-2004, 03:14 PM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
Why would anyone go to the expense of trying to put one of those engines back in a car? I've seen many of those diesels get swapped to gassers and still see them on the road. It was way cheaper to drop a small block Chevy than rebuilding the diesels plus as it was mentioned earlier people were wary of the dependabilty of those diesels. I remember wanting to pick up a nice Cutlass with a blown diesel for cheap back in the 80's and dropping a 454 Chevy big block in one. The idea faded because I didn't have enough money or persistence to follow through.

__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page