![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I agree. There is no possibility of shearing the vehicle in two pieces as shown in that photo, no matter how fast the opposing vehicle was travelling. The unitbody construction won't allow a failure of this type.
I wouldn't be surprised if it's a reconstructed vehicle from two good halves. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() It doesn't take a physics major to sense that something is off about the dynamics of the crash ... which is why I'm totally WOWED by this one, for now at least. ![]()
__________________
1987 300D, arctic white/palomino--314,000 miles 1978 240D 4-speed, Euro Delivery, light ivory/bamboo--370,000 miles 2005 Jeep Liberty CRD Limited, light khaki/slate--140,000 miles 2018 Chevy Cruze diesel, 6-speed manual, satin steel metallic/kalahari--19,000 miles 1982 Peugeot 505 diesel, 4-speed manual, blue/blue, 130,000 miles 1995 S320, black/parchment--34,000 miles (Dad's car) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If it was hit by a train, it would not shear in half cleanly as shown in this photo. In fact, I'd bet that the train might crush is badly from one side, but the resultant wreck would remain largely intact. The vehicle that drove off, the Nissan, was not involved in the accident. That vehicle was drag racing the Saturn. The rescuers would never cut an entire vehicle in half to rescue someone. It would take them way too much time for this. As you mentioned in a separate post, they certainly wouldn't cut the vehicle in half and then move one section 30 feet from the opposite section. Nope, this vehicle was most certainly assembled from two halves or the story is fabricated. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I'd like to see a picture of the Saturn that hit it hard enough to split a W126 in half.
The first thing I thought was that the chassis must have had a lot of rust, but I don't see much visible. Ken300D
__________________
-------------------------- 1982 300D at 351K miles 1984 300SD at 217K miles 1987 300D at 370K miles |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
buddy of mine has just such a unit,it's a 2000 buick park ave ultra.it was assembled from 2 cars from the same wreck.a 2000 buick rearended a 2000 buick so they cut the front off the one and the back off the other.the body shop that did it does lots of em.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I dunno, Guys ... it looks too clean ... perhaps the tow crew cut it apart to clear it from the telephone/power pole ... so they wouldn't have to drop the pole ... the roof area and the bottom side cuts look too straight - and, without a lot of stretching ...
Don't ya think the pole would have sustained more damage? I don't see any fluids .... no tire marks, nothing on the curb area ... Maybe the car was damaged elsewhere and then the back portion was stored in the median to get it out of the way? Again, I don't see any tracks of any sort - the grass doesn't even look damaged ... Just doesn't add up ...
__________________
George Stephenson 1991 350 SDL (200K and she ain't bent, yet) former 2002 E320 4Matic Wagon - good car former 1985 300 CD - great car former 1981 300 TD - good car former 1972 280 SEL - not so good car a couple of those diesel Rabbits ...40-45 mpg |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Any pics of the Saturn? I would expect for such a thing to happen the Saturn would have to have been doing 100mph if not more. At those speeds there should be parts of it everywhere. But there should be a ball of Saturn somewhere with human remains.
![]() Also the jaws of life ect can do that without much trouble. I have seen it done before with an early 80's Buick. Usually they just cut the roof off, they wouldn't cut it in half unless they had to, takes longer. With the jaws you can have the roof off of any car real fast. Tragic accident none the less, I hope the find the other guy and give him 20 years.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
see if ya can get some more pics of that one bodhi
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
That pic of the 190 is exactly how I would expect a 126 to look in an accident like that....and like Brian said, probably a little less crushed.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- ![]() '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
it is interesting that there is no fuel spillage under the rear section. and the rear seat bottom lying there in the street, it looks as if there was no damage to it, which doesn't make sense with this type of accident.
__________________
71 220D 169K wrecked 83 240D 118K sweet 4 speed 91 350SDL (one of the 60% good engines) 156K 84 300d (loaner to my sister) 189K 79 300SD (partswagen) 86 420SEL partswagen 70 220d (partswagen) 68 280s GASSER!!! under construction now 85 300sd 310K miles winter beater car retired 93 300d 2.5 turbo 168K wife's car 83 280SL euro 5 speed 155K 69 250S newest project 54K |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
190 crash pic
That 190 pic reminds me of the crashes I saw all over the place in Kuwait - they have a ton of high speed crashes over there due to lack of enforcement and bad technique - they just leave the hulks at the side of the road until all investigations are over.
John
__________________
![]() ![]() 1978 280CE Astral Silver now 59,xxx miles and counting ![]() 1986 300E Black Pearl Metallic 143,xxx miles 5-spd daily driver w/ blk leather "Schwarz-Schönheit" 1989 190E 2.6 (euro) 5-spd Desert Taupe 112,xxx kms Had to leave behind in Germany!!! "Helga" 1983 300D Pastel Beige now 312,xxx + miles SOLD ![]() OBK#24 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I doubt the car was anything but an old lady's low milage Merc bought new.
Aren't there any other people in here who are police, fire and rescue, or EMT's?? It's not uncommon to find cars cut in half in major accidents, and they sometimes seem to have been cut with a knife. It's bizarre and unexpected, certainly, but not unusual no matter the make. Unibody cars have no frame structure, per se, and are constructed in pieces. The joints between pieces are natural points of seperation and this one doesn't look unusual at all. Late manufacture cars built under the more stringent side impact requirements do seem to do better. Back then there was limited attention paid to the damage occuring in side impact events. It likely was done by side impact with the wooden pole from the resting places of the pieces. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Here's how a 190 holds up against extreme side impact crashes. Similar area of impact, too.
.... Wait a second. The DNS is kind of inappropriate. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Second try...
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You could hit the vehicle in the side with an Amtrak train and it would not split in half......... |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|