Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:49 PM
dmorrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colleyville, Texas
Posts: 2,695
If it was a brown ring shape then it was the original filter from manufacturing the car. It is washable and reusable. I had the same in my 300TD but chose to use the new style filter instead.

Dave

__________________
1970 220D, owned 1980-1990
1980 240D, owned 1990-1992
1982 300TD, owned 1992-1993
1986 300SDL, owned 1993-2004
1999 E300, owned 1999-2003
1982 300TD, 213,880mi, owned since Nov 18, 1991- Aug 4, 2010 SOLD
1988 560SL, 100,000mi, owned since 1995
1965 Mustang Fastback Mileage Unknown(My sons)
1983 240D, 176,000mi (My daughers) owned since 2004
2007 Honda Accord EX-L I4 auto, the new daily driver
1985 300D 264,000mi Son's new daily driver.(sold)
2008 Hyundai Tiberon. Daughters new car

Last edited by dmorrison; 01-31-2007 at 02:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-30-2007, 10:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noblekitty View Post
I have a 1996 E300D and I can't seem to find any power steering fluid filter on it. Does any body know?
It's inside the fluid reservoir on the 123's. Probably there in yours also.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-31-2007, 08:32 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The eighties up through mid to late nineties p/s systems have seals that will be attacked by Dexron ATF. The most economical and very acceptable fluid is just plain old Power Steering fluid from the auto supply store.

The system should be PROPERLY and THOROUGHLY flushed. Removing what's in the reservoir and replacing it will do virtually NOTHING.

What I call the "ASE Test Method" for flushing the power steering fluid is very easily and quickly accomplished on 123 and 124 MB cars. Unlike many other cars, these cars have a filter that should be changed when doing this procedure. Replace the filter after the flush portion of the procedure but before refilling the system during the procedure. With the reservoir empty you will see the filter at the bottom of the reservoir. It is shaped like a hockey puck with a hole in the middle.

The flushing procedure requires about four quarts of P/S fluid, two of which will be flushed through the system and disposed of and then the other two will be used to refill the system.

Remove the return line to the P/S pump and lower it down into a drain pan. Plug the hole from which you removed the return line. With the two quarts of fluid opened and at hand, have an assistant start the car and begin turning the steering wheel back and forth lock to lock. As the reservoir level goes down continue to pour the two quarts of fluid into the reservoir while engine is idling. As soon as the fluid is all gone AND the steering wheel can no longer be turned easily, the assistant must shut off the engine.

At this point replace the filter, put the return line back in place and fill the reservoir. Don't let the assistant go back in the house yet. Have the assistant start the car and again turn the wheel back and forth as you slowly fill the reservoir. Keep turning the wheel back and forth to bleed the system and draw fluid from the reservoir until it is full.

After driving the car around the block or back and forth to work once, recheck the fluid.

This is the best 20 minutes you will spend to maintain your p/s system.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-31-2007, 08:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
Removing what's in the reservoir and replacing it will do virtually NOTHING.
If it's done enough times, though, one could almost entirely replace the fluid, right? What's the downside of this, assuming it's done repeatedly? Then, as a way of maintaining, just drain and refill the reservoir at whatever interval.

Just trying to understand....
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 156k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 173k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 143k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete

19 Honda CR-V EX 67k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-31-2007, 10:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 375
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
Remove the return line to the P/S pump and lower it down into a drain pan. Plug the hole from which you removed the return line.
I am not a DIY type but after reading your post I am ready to try this on my 240D 77, where/which exactly is the return line to the P/S pump? would you be able to describe the line location?

Vahe
240D 77 350K
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-31-2007, 11:20 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by vahe View Post
I am not a DIY type but after reading your post I am ready to try this on my 240D 77, where/which exactly is the return line to the P/S pump? would you be able to describe the line location?

Vahe
240D 77 350K
it is the hose with the hose clamp on it, not the hose with the crimp on pressure line...
John
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-31-2007, 12:09 PM
Shawn D.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by shertex View Post
If it's done enough times, though, one could almost entirely replace the fluid, right? What's the downside of this, assuming it's done repeatedly? Then, as a way of maintaining, just drain and refill the reservoir at whatever interval.

Just trying to understand...
You'd never have entirely "fresh" fluid and would remove newer fluid along with older fluid. You'd end up using more fluid than necessary in exchange for a bit of labor savings, but by the time you factor in the number of times you'd have to do it, the labor would probably be a wash.

For example, let's say system "X" contains ten quarts of fluid (ten is convenient here for the math), and let's say that between each exchange of one quart, the "old" fluid stays "old" and the "new" stays "new."

Change 1)
- remove one quart of mixed fluid, replace with one quart of new
- the removed fluid is 100% old
- you end up with 9 quarts of old, 1 quart of new

Change 2)
- remove one quart of mixed fluid, replace with one quart of new
- the removed fluid is 90% old, 10% new
- you end up with 8.1 quarts of old, 1.9 quarts of new

Change 3)
- remove one quart of mixed fluid, replace with one quart of new
- the removed fluid is 81% old, 19% new
- you end up with 7.3 quarts of old, 2.7 quarts of new

... and so on, ending up with these amounts after each change:

Change 4) 6.6 old, 3.4 new

Change 5) 5.9 old, 4.1 new

Change 6) 5.3 old, 4.7 new

Change 7) 4.8 old, 5.2 new

Change 8) 4.3 old, 5.7 new

Change 9) 3.9 old, 6.1 new

Change 10) 3.5 old, 6.5 new

So, after ten changes using a total of 10.0 quarts, you only end up with only 6.5 quarts of new fluid, whereas if you'd changed it out in one session, you'd have 10.0 quarts of new fluid. It would take a long time and many changes to even approach a total changeout. Yes, the proportion of changeout on the real system we're talking about would be higher and you'd approach the asymptote more quickly, but the point is still the same.

Put another way, one job done halfway, plus another job done halfway doesn't equal one job done completely.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-31-2007, 12:21 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn D. View Post
You'd never have entirely "fresh" fluid and would remove newer fluid along with older fluid. You'd end up using more fluid than necessary in exchange for a bit of labor savings, but by the time you factor in the number of times you'd have to do it, the labor would probably be a wash.

For example, let's say system "X" contains ten quarts of fluid (ten is convenient here for the math), and let's say that between each exchange of one quart, the "old" fluid stays "old" and the "new" stays "new."

Change 1)
- remove one quart of mixed fluid, replace with one quart of new
- the removed fluid is 100% old
- you end up with 9 quarts of old, 1 quart of new

Change 2)
- remove one quart of mixed fluid, replace with one quart of new
- the removed fluid is 90% old, 10% new
- you end up with 8.1 quarts of old, 1.9 quarts of new

Change 3)
- remove one quart of mixed fluid, replace with one quart of new
- the removed fluid is 81% old, 19% new
- you end up with 7.3 quarts of old, 2.7 quarts of new

... and so on, ending up with these amounts after each change:

Change 4) 6.6 old, 3.4 new

Change 5) 5.9 old, 4.1 new

Change 6) 5.3 old, 4.7 new

Change 7) 4.8 old, 5.2 new

Change 8) 4.3 old, 5.7 new

Change 9) 3.9 old, 6.1 new

Change 10) 3.5 old, 6.5 new

So, after ten changes using a total of 10.0 quarts, you only end up with only 6.5 quarts of new fluid, whereas if you'd changed it out in one session, you'd have 10.0 quarts of new fluid. It would take a long time and many changes to even approach a total changeout. Yes, the proportion of changeout on the real system we're talking about would be higher and you'd approach the asymptote more quickly, but the point is still the same.

Put another way, one job done halfway, plus another job done halfway doesn't equal one job done completely.
not to mention that all the left in new fluid, becomes dirty and contaminated when it contacts and mixes with the old fluid...
John

__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page