Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
How many engines have you designed?  I tend to think the Germans back in the fatherland who built these cars were pretty smart...
|
Nice
straw man argument!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurkha
Point is, oil reaches places where coolant can't, ring land, top end, every nook and cranny in the engine, and best of all, it has heat transferring ability, so why not let it do its good job, even if your coolant temp is low, its not an indicator of what the actual temps are in critical area.
|
Point is, if the oil cooler thermostat never opens during the driving conditions I encounter, it doesn’t matter whether the oil cooler is present.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgkast
Don't worry...he's an engineer.
So am I, but I'm the kind of engineer that believes in using a FACTOR OF SAFETY.
|
Well, are you also the kind of engineer who understands that if a component never comes into use during certain conditions, it’s extraneous for those conditions?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pequod
......President Lincoln had a saying for positions like yours." Better to be thought of as a fool than open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
|
Well, if I ever had any doubt about this community being sanctimonious about Mercedes engineering, all doubt is now removed!
What I don’t understand is how none of you comprehend that I’m agnostic on the necessity of the oil cooler for my operating conditions. I have never said “It is not necessary” – I asked “Is it necessary?” Do any of you understand the difference between a statement and a question?