![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I just go by UOAs and they tell me otherwise, a well designed mineral based HDEO will give the run for money to any synth out there in terms of performance, I am sure in an ideal situation of no soot and no fuel dilution the synth will win in the long run, but that not being the case, both HDEO and synth manage to do quite well and both have to be replaced at a given interval, synth might let you stretch a bit but not by much, in that case, their relatively higher cost is totally negated, where synth will outperform all mineral is extreme conditions, now we don't tend to get that in our daily drives unless we live in Antarctic or Siachen glacier.
__________________
99 Gurkha with OM616 IDI turbo 2015 Gurkha with OM616 DI turbo 2014 Rexton W with OM612 VGT |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Once I have some baselines established, I'd even be open-minded enough to try the mystery oil that website is touting. Of course, I'd share my findings with you fine folks. That's really the only way to tell if it's any good, right? Do you hear that Mr. Syn-Lube? I said I'd be willing to try it. How's that for open-minded? (Yeah, I'm a little irritated by the post they made. Attacking members here is very un-cool. Not a good way to introduce yourself to potential customers. Dare I say that it's bad business practise?)
__________________
- K.C.Adams '77 300D Euro Delivery OM617 turbo / 4-speed swap 404 Milanbraun Metallic / 134 Dattel MB-Tex Current status: * Undergoing body work My '77 300D progress thread |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|