Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2007, 12:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
617 turbo valve adjustment lobe position

I adjusted the valves last night on my 83 300D. I reviewed old ShopForum threads as well as threads all over the web.

I have two questions:

1.When I position the lobe at "1 o'clock" does the tip of the lobe point to the driver's side or passenger side of the car?

My MB service manual says: "positioning the camshaft so that the tip of the cam is vertical relative to the rocker arm." but the picture in the manual does not show the tip or lobe on on the camshaft in the diagram.

Diesel Giant says: "To your eye this will look like the lobe is in about the 1 o'clock position" but the tip of the camshaft lobe in his picture looks to me like it is pointing toward the passenger side of the vehicle, (the engine he is working on is a 617 non-turbo).

2.Can I lube the linkage with regular wheel bearing grease after I clean them?

Thanks for the help. I have two more valve adjustments to go.

Bob

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2007, 12:53 PM
Shawn D.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob300DSD View Post
1.When I position the lobe at "1 o'clock" does the tip of the lobe point to the driver's side or passenger side of the car?

My MB service manual says: "positioning the camshaft so that the tip of the cam is vertical relative to the rocker arm." but the picture in the manual does not show the tip or lobe on on the camshaft in the diagram.

Diesel Giant says: "To your eye this will look like the lobe is in about the 1 o'clock position" but the tip of the camshaft lobe in his picture looks to me like it is pointing toward the passenger side of the vehicle, (the engine he is working on is a 617 non-turbo).
Just position the lobe so the lobe is pointed 180 degrees away from the rocker. That way, the cam will certainly be on the base circle.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2007, 12:59 PM
guage's Avatar
PEEKABOO I SEE YOU
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,716
I stood on the drivers side using a bump starter and positioned the lobe as pictured here, which would be also pointing to the drivers side

I used trans fluid to lube the linkage
Attached Thumbnails
617 turbo valve adjustment lobe position-cam-position-measuring.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2007, 01:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by guage View Post
I stood on the drivers side using a bump starter and positioned the lobe as pictured here, which would be also pointing to the drivers side

I used trans fluid to lube the linkage
Thanks for the feedback Guage, I interpreted things just as you.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2007, 01:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn D. View Post
Just position the lobe so the lobe is pointed 180 degrees away from the rocker. That way, the cam will certainly be on the base circle.
When I look closely at the rocker it is not easy for me to discern the curve in the arm as displayed in the manual's diagram. Hence I am tempted to position the lobe straight up or positioned at 12 o'clock. When I turned the camshaft and checked clearance it seemed to me that the rockers had the most clearance at little past straight up at about 1 o'clock on the drivers' side. However the difference was so minimal it is hard for me to be sure there was actually any difference.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-15-2007, 01:31 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob300DSD View Post
When I look closely at the rocker it is not easy for me to discern the curve in the arm as displayed in the manual's diagram. Hence I am tempted to position the lobe straight up or positioned at 12 o'clock. When I turned the camshaft and checked clearance it seemed to me that the rockers had the most clearance at little past straight up at about 1 o'clock on the drivers' side. However the difference was so minimal it is hard for me to be sure there was actually any difference.

Bob
We've had this discussion in the past and the opinions were varied. The question is whether the base circle of the camshaft is constant. If it is, then the slight difference between 12:00 and 1:00 is meaningless. Most folks conclude that it is not significant.

However, there were a couple of members who noted a difference in readings when the cam was moved from 12:00 to 1:00...........so, YMMV.

As Gauge mentioned, if you use the 1:00 position, it's toward the driver's side.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-15-2007, 01:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
We've had this discussion in the past and the opinions were varied. The question is whether the base circle of the camshaft is constant. If it is, then the slight difference between 12:00 and 1:00 is meaningless. Most folks conclude that it is not significant.

However, there were a couple of members who noted a difference in readings when the cam was moved from 12:00 to 1:00...........so, YMMV.

As Gauge mentioned, if you use the 1:00 position, it's toward the driver's side.
Thanks Brian:

I think I have read every thread on ShopForum and the rest of the net and understood there was some varied opinions. I intentionally did this on my junker 300D before working on two cars with good engines. I was a little disappointed after I finished the job because the car still has really poor compression and wanted to make sure I did the procedure correctly. The valves on the car had no clearance prior to adjustment so I was hoping for the best.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2007, 02:07 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob300DSD View Post
Thanks Brian:

I think I have read every thread on ShopForum and the rest of the net and understood there was some varied opinions. I intentionally did this on my junker 300D before working on two cars with good engines. I was a little disappointed after I finished the job because the car still has really poor compression and wanted to make sure I did the procedure correctly. The valves on the car had no clearance prior to adjustment so I was hoping for the best.

Bob
Once the valves get down to zero clearance.........there's a chance that they don't fully close. If this happens, the seats are usually damaged from the heat.

..........there goes the compression.........
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2007, 03:16 PM
BIGRED's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Coarsegold Ca
Posts: 694
Had I known... while mine was apart.....I would have used a dial indicator to read the base of the lobe to see if there is a difference and if so...where the "sweet spot" is.
__________________
1980 300TD-T (82 Turbo and Trans) 159,000 Miles "Jackie-O"
1983 300SD 272,000 Miles "Aristotle"
1987 Jeep Wagoneer Limited - keeps the MB's off the ice and out of the snow
1994 BMW 530it
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2009, 05:17 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,428
Hello, just did an adjustment on mynew to me 82 300cd. I used the metal bar that stretches across all the cam towers as the reference point. That put me a bit beyond 1 o'clock but it looked right per the manual pictures.

Does anyone just align the lobe with the metal bar?

I havent done an adjustment since about 2003, and hope I didn't do it wrong. All were tight - I'll post the values later. I thought it was due to being due...

Thanks!
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-06-2009, 07:05 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
YES

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHZR2 View Post
Hello, just did an adjustment on my-new to me 82 300cd. I used the metal bar that stretches across all the cam towers as the reference point. That put me a bit beyond 1 o'clock but it looked right per the manual pictures.

Does anyone just align the lobe with the metal bar?

I haven't done an adjustment since about 2003, and hope I didn't do it wrong. All were tight - I'll post the values later. I thought it was due to being due...

Thanks!
I use the cam shaft oiler tube as reference point..

Everything you need to do it correctly is here..

Valve adjustment OM617 FYI.
Valve adjustment OM615, 616, 617 FYI.



Have a great day.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-07-2009, 05:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Yountville, CA
Posts: 1,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by whunter View Post
I use the cam shaft oiler tube as reference point..

Everything you need to do it correctly is here..

Valve adjustment OM617 FYI.
Valve adjustment OM615, 616, 617 FYI.



Have a great day.
I oriented off cam oiler tube as well -made eye balling a lot less complicated!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2009, 10:51 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,428
Thanks.

So you line up (or point) the "tip" of the cam lobe with that tube?

My main concern is because before adjusting, I had the following readings:

#1E: .203mm
#1I: .152mm
#2I: .127mm
#2E: .229mm
#3E: .254mm
#3I: .173mm
#4I: .179mm
#4E: .229mm
#5E: .229mm
#5I: .102mm

So I had set each cam lobe to point exactly to the oiler tube on the cam towers. It matches up to the instruction pictures that way IMO, and also the cam is round for 120 degrees or so, Id guess there shouldn't be much variability, but those were pretty far off from the .10mm in and .35mm out per the sticker on the car. The interesting thing to me is, if they were done "right" last time, then while the exhausts all got tighter (expected), the intakes all got looser, how is that? The other option is that the last time the wrong specs were used.

Car idled and ran perfectly with those old settings. Going cross-country, I got mid 28 MPG, averaging 75 MPH, and spending time above or near 7500 ft.

One other thought/question. I did this job roughly at freezing. The car was definitely cold soaked, having not been used for over a week. Could this be "too cold", and cause me issues again later when ambient gets warmer?

Chain stretch at TDC: 4 degrees

__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)

Last edited by JHZR2; 12-06-2009 at 10:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-06-2009, 11:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
As clear as the FSM states where the cam lobe is supposed to point I can not believe there could be this much discussion about it.

If a person is having trouble getting and keeping the proper tolerance during valve setting the FSM suggests putting new cap and lock nuts on the valves as a first and cheap possible fix for the situation. They take a lot of pressure and pounding...so they can get worn on the threads and make it hard to hold the correct distance through the tightening process.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-06-2009, 11:24 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,428
As clear as the image is in the manual and in haynes type manuals, Im suprised that it is not mentioned that the oiling tube can be used as a reference point. It sure seems to line up right for me. But for those of us who have never really had to do this job before, and see it as a task with much to loose beause of a general lack of full understanding... it is important to have a sense of correctness and surety to the process.

Still, it helps to have a sounding board to ensure that my thought process and technique is absolutely correct, or not. Sure seem to see conflicting stuff, from vertical to one o'clock... Im referencing the graphic for angle and design of the system.

One thing that I did not do was crank all around and then recheck. Hope they are OK. The nuts all worked fine. Some needed a bit of oomph to loosen, but they worked, loosened and tightened just fine.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page