Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:37 PM
NoSparkNeeded's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 509
Don't want to appear too dumb but..

I've seen some threads that kinda drift around the fact that biodiesel
somehow is not as "good" for our motors as running petroD. I've read
all the poop on WVO, and decided not to pursue that.
Is there a downside to motor longevity if you run B100 as opposed to
dino? I know about the hose issues. How about engine life? 2 brand new
motors, 1 petroD, one B100. In theory which lasts longer under similar
use? More maintenance with bio? The same? Other than eco benefits,
is bio better worse or the same as dino?

__________________
85 300TD FED-Daily
84 300SD-Wife's
86 XJS-Sunday
66 GMC-Work- Given to my stepson
83 BMW Airhead- Given to my stepson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:42 PM
BoomInTheTrunk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rancho Cucamunga, California
Posts: 713
The bio atleast what i think would make the engine last longer. It provides better lubrication to diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-09-2008, 08:50 PM
Chad300tdt's Avatar
Benzless Scoutmaster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Wales, PA
Posts: 4,001
From what I've read, water suspended in the biodiesel is the possible long-term issue. There are water separator filters that can be used. Also colder winter temp pose another problem with fuel gelling.

I've also gathered that with proper filtering via centrifuge, you can remove all particles down to 1/2 micron and the water from WVO.

I'm considering filtering in this manner, then blending and using injector line heaters and a heated filter. In winter I will probably just run straight Dino.

As far as engine longevity, all the reading I've done suggests that biodiesel will keep your engine cleaner and the result should be longer life provided you have properly dewatered it and removed all the methanol.

Dino doesn't have any of those maintenance issues but you can't make it at home.
__________________
Chad
2006 Nissan Pathfinder LE
1998 Acura 3.0 CL
OBK#44
"Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." - Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)

SOLD
1985 300TD - Red Dragon
1986 300SDL - Coda
1991 - 300TE
1995 - E320
1985 300CD - Gladys
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2008, 09:11 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,518
... my Injector/ pump mechanic says B100 leaves a residue on the pump that damages it... I am not sure he knows the diff between Bio and WVO though...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2008, 09:19 PM
Mustang_man298's Avatar
Man of the fire
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Shingletown,Ca
Posts: 941
I'll say I haven't done a huge bout of research on it, but my present understanding of it, is that if you keep WVO properly heated you are ok, it's when it gets below a certain temp that it begins to form deposits and coke rings and such. I was pretty serious about making the jump as well, now I am wondering if it's worth it, the cost of a proper kit for the car vs the fact that WVO is now becoming a valuable commodity in most states quickly due to commercial bio producers now buying it from restaurants has made me wonder lately if it's even worth doing these days. I picture myself buying a kit then having to buy "fuel" very soon thereafter, countering the very reason to do it. We all saw the day coming, it was just a matter of how fast you got on the bandwagon that determined the amount of benefit and profit you got from it. I, unfortunately tend to be the type to hold off and take the "wait and see" approach to things, which kinda bit me this time, though, it DID get me finally into driving the Benz's I liked the looks of seeing drive by as a young kid....
__________________
Chris
64 190D R.I.P.
80 240D W/617 engine -for sale
82 240D -for sale

Last edited by Mustang_man298; 07-09-2008 at 09:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-09-2008, 09:46 PM
CoyoteStarfish's Avatar
(Bio)diesel enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 167
If using biodiesel made properly,a bio and petro engine side-by-side should be equal in longevity.

LESS maintenance with bioD IN THEORY. According to my findings, engine oil in biodiesel powered engines can be used up to 200% of their recommended service life. I've serviced about 8 bio powered vehicles, running on straight bio for 5 years. Each vehicles oil was changed at twice the interval indicated on the FSM and oil manufacturers info sheets.

This is said to be atributed to the lower carbon and possibly sulfer content?

A small ammount of additive was used for the initial oil fills, "TuffOil".

Now the reality of this statement; I have no idea if it did damge to the engines or not. I was just instructed to do this at my bosses request. Prior to an oil change engine flush was used, then the charge was drained. Filled half way with new oil, ran for 1/2 hour. The drained again, then filled with 50:50 synthetic/standard.

All I know was, the oil came out ashy-grey looking. Not black. And the motors haven't siezed yet. So, why not.

That being said, back to Dino Vs Bio;
Another thing to note is that side by side, the bio engine will consume more fuel volume per unit of energy produced. This is due to BioD's lower BTUs and slower burn time, some of this power loss can be corrected with timing adjustments.

Better, same, worse? I would say slightly worse due to the power loss and ommision of eco-benifits.

Which the eco benifits themselvs are very fringe, as bio/WVO can produce more NOx emmissions, said to be 200-something times more potent of a greenhose gas by volume than CO2 is. Not going to stop me from greasing my benz though. Sigh.
__________________
Vehicles:
2002 SLK 230
Gone but not forgotten:
1983 300D
1981 El Camino 'OILBRNR' - 6.2L diesel
OM617 powered '86 F150
1984 BMW 524td
2001 VW Beetle TDI
1994 Sunurban 4x4 6.5L diesel
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-09-2008, 09:50 PM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,401
I recently saw a thread reporting on the results of "water tests." The tester found that pump dino diesel had at least as much water in it as either pump biodiesel or home-made biodiesel. Home-brewers definitely need to make sure they've properly dried their biodiesel but I wouldn't worry about commercial stuff, they use an entirely different manufacturing process. Comment: this is part of the misinformation still going around about biodiesel. None of us are entirely innocent, including myself, we all tend to pass on unreliable information.

There are really only three significant concerns for anyone using commercial biodiesel in a Mercedes:
(1) make sure your rubber fuel lines are biodiesel-rated;
(2) keep an eye on your pre-filter for crud that the biodiesel might dissolve out of your fuel system and change filters a little more often at first;
(3) make sure you use a blend of bio and dino when temps start to drop. To determine how much, experiment in your refrigerator.

I am currently running every vehicle I own on biodiesel and have never had any serious problems since 2004. Even when hoses start to melt, it's a slow process. You have a lot more time than the Wicked Witch of the West had (she was gone in a few seconds, as I recall).

Jeremy
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-2008, 10:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, CA & 1,150 miles S of Key West
Posts: 4,874
I personally believe there to be very little difficerence in longetivity using commercially prepared B99 vs D2, although the engine does appear to work harder using B99 as mpg's are reduced in my expirience.

I believe some amount of additional risk is introduced when using homebrew Bio and that more risk is introduced using a two tank, heated SVO/WVO system. Unheated SVO/WVO and unheated blenders are wack IMO.
__________________
Terry Allison
N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama

09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA)
09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-09-2008, 11:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 438
The latest information that I've seen as far as water is concerned, Biodiesel actually had less water than #2. Biodiesel also have more lubrication than #2 and at the same time, much less soot. Soot is probably the main contamination of diesel engine oil (at least for engines on #2)
The only downside of Bio is that is does have less BTU per gallon and in some engines, produces slightly more nitrosoxide, but otherwise, all other pollution levels are drastically reduced.
The other downside, which is primarily for older engines, is that older fuel lines are not made of materials that will last with continued use of Biodiesel, however, after 20+ years, it would probably be a good idea to replace them anyway.

And for the sake of clarification, I am talking about real Biodiesel, and not so-called 'bio-fuels', which are 'blended' fuels and not converted VO/WVO.
__________________
87 300SDL - 215K Miles !!
99 F-350CC Dually PSD - 190K
86 300SDL - 189K
All on B-100
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2008, 08:58 AM
LUVMBDiesels's Avatar
Dead on balls accurate...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Red Lion,Pa
Posts: 2,207
I have been running the SDL amlost exclusively on commercial B100 and it seemd to like it better than D2. I have no scientific proof of this, but the oil stays cleaner, the car does not smoke as much and my mileage has gone from 28mpg to 27mpg. Not a big deal...

__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy"

Current
Monika '74 450 SL
BrownHilda '79 280SL
FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban
Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee
Krystal 2004 Volvo S60
Gone
'74 Jeep CJ5
'97 Jeep ZJ Laredo
Rudolf 86 300SDL
Bruno '81 300SD
Fritzi '84 BMW
'92 Subaru
'96 Impala SS
'71 Buick GS conv
'67 GTO conv
'63 Corvair conv
'57 Nomad
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page