Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2008, 12:01 AM
MercedesOtto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtludwig View Post
Your example has NOTHING to do with the rotational speed of the engine and EVERYTHING to do with the force needed to push the car through the air. Force required cubes with the square of speed. Less speed = less force, less force = less fuel. Your mileage will rise significantly at 65mph vs 75-80 mph.
Your statement ignores the point of the question and fact that the efficiency of an internal combustion engine is dependent on RPM. Try to go cross country in 3rd gear .
My attempt is to optimize MPG at a given commuter speed of 75MPH. This speed is probably higher than what the vehicle was optimized for. (Probably 60 or something).
Since a 5th gear to lower RPM is out of question, the only remaining option is the overall gear ratio. After more than 3000 miles I know now that 12% taller tires help about 2-3%. on my MPG.
__________________
Good Patina Comes With Good Miles Driven.
Drive more polish less

220SEB 1963 (excellent driver with no rust but far from pretty)
300 TD Wagon 1981 (Daily Commuter Tractor)
911 MFI 1973

www.vintagemotion.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2008, 08:23 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,938
Did you correct your calculations for odo and speedo error caused by the taller tires?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2008, 11:53 AM
rrgrassi's Avatar
mmmmmm Diesel...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Royse City Tx
Posts: 5,220
The same diesel engine will use more fuel running 3000 rpm vs 2500 rpm, going the same mph.

All the other stuff stated will also factor in.
__________________
RRGrassi


70's Southern Pacific #5608 Fairmont A-4 MOW car

13 VW JSW 2.0 TDI 193K, Tuned with DPF and EGR Delete.

99 W210 E300 Turbo Diesel, chipped, DPF/Converter Delete. Still needs EGR Delete, 232K

90 Dodge D250 5.9 Cummins/5 speed. 400K

Gone and still missed...1982 w123 300D, 1991 w124 300D
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2008, 02:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2,053
I couldn't imagine only getting 20 mpg.
I think the worst I have ever gotten is around 25 in town
with a lead foot.

I think I would look into the maint. things too
Brakes dragging, injectors, tire pressure, etc.
__________________
81 Mercedes 300SD 289k.......SOLD
82 Mercedes 300CD 252k......slow ride

82 mercedes 300 SD...mi Unknown
83 Mercedes 300D ????ksniff..gone too
84 Mercedes 300D 148k........SOLD
85 Mercedes 300TD 386k and holding some one elses project
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2008, 01:45 AM
rrgrassi's Avatar
mmmmmm Diesel...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Royse City Tx
Posts: 5,220
My 300D was assembled in 10/81. It is classed as an 82. It has the turbo.
__________________
RRGrassi


70's Southern Pacific #5608 Fairmont A-4 MOW car

13 VW JSW 2.0 TDI 193K, Tuned with DPF and EGR Delete.

99 W210 E300 Turbo Diesel, chipped, DPF/Converter Delete. Still needs EGR Delete, 232K

90 Dodge D250 5.9 Cummins/5 speed. 400K

Gone and still missed...1982 w123 300D, 1991 w124 300D
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-15-2008, 06:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 27
My '81 TD is most fuel efficient at about 50-55 mph--that's a little unrealistic for highway driving. Nevertheless, speed has a significant impact on mph.
RPM's definitely impact mileage, diesel or gasser--you can sit in your driveway revving to 3500rpm for 10 minutes and burn a lot more fuel than at normal idle.
__________________
1999 E320 4matic really nice Wagon 135k
1981 300TD loud, rattling family car 180k (TGI sold!)
1985 500SEL gas guzzler 220k (sold)
1978 300D my first Turtlediesel (sold)437k
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2008, 10:04 AM
lowriderdog37's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Viera, FL
Posts: 665
I put the 2.47 in my CD, along with a 4 speed. I love the more relaxed RPM, much better mileage, and quieter rpm on the highway. I can't comment definitively on my mileage improvement yet, but on the first half of my road trip, I made 35mpg!

I wouldn't do it unless you do a good bit of highway driving. If you do though, the swap is well worth it!
__________________
My Primary Driver - '85 300CD - 4-speed conversion, 2.47 rear, lowered, euro headlights, rebuilding (not restoring so much)

Wife's - '08 Saab Sportcombi Aero

Riding a '03 Yamaha Warrior
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page