![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Reply to Eric
Quote:
how about qualifying your comments with your professional qualifications in the fields of Combustion Science and Chemical Engineering. I am yet to find any one on this site who is qualified to make the comments that are often made. umm. I don't see your qualifications posted anywhere. kind of hypocritical don't you think? Quote: There are often ill informed opinions made on very technically complex questions. yours being a prime example in this case. So others Know, I have sent Eric a PM detailing my qualifications & inviting him to do likewise. I do not expect a reply.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort.... ![]() 1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket. 1980 300D now parts car 800k miles 1984 300D 500k miles ![]() 1987 250td 160k miles English import ![]() 2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles ![]() 1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo. 1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion. Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
A friend of mine tried this and loved it for a few tanks and then all of his vehicles started smoking like crazy. So much so that his wife got pulled over in her Excursion because of the cloud. I cant say that he made the fuel 100% right but he has been refining WVO for a few years. I have never seen crazy smoke like that before.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Lets see a picture of your "degree", text on a screen is as good as the paper its printed on. Have a nice day. ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I've found 10% amount of wmo as an additive has no detrimental effects and even adds a nice amount of pep via increased btu's. My previous 89 F350 craved it and kept asking for more. Higher ratios can lead to ill effects and poor exhaust smell. Last edited by neumann; 01-26-2010 at 10:51 PM. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|