|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Minus the shifter linkage. Remove the shifter and you have a square hole. This would allow for the Chevy boot and shifter.......... Oh No not again... RESIST THE URGE ...RESIST THE URGE..... TOO MANY PROJECTS....
__________________
Experience : what you receive 3 seconds after you really needed it !! 86 300SDL 387,000? Motor committed suicide 81 300SD 214,000 "new" 132,000 motor 83 300SD 212,000 parts car 83 300SD 147,000 91 F700 5.9 cummins 5spd eaton 298,000 66 AMC rambler American 2dr auto 108,000 95 Chevy 3/4 ton auto 160,000 03 Toyota 4runner 180,000 wifes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Im sure you could make it work though! Would be a hell of a project to make this NV3500 work in an MB body though. Ill have to scrounge around for the shifter linkage bars and shifter and take another pic to show how much further back they are
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Some more pictures of the transmission adapter plate
Here are some more pictures of the transmission adapter plate - to spur you on!
It is a really nice casting - and it weighs in at 2.7 kg - just so you know. It is held in place with 4 M10 (I think) bolts - strength rating 8.8 - coarse pitch thread
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
You can buy an adapter for a 700r4, and they are plenty stout to handle the 180# of torque from the om617, but I'd like to point out the gear spread is identical to the mercedes transmission, first in the mercedes is about 4:1 with top gear being 1:1, with the 700r4 the range is roughly 3:1 in first with top gear at roughly 0.8:1, changing the final drive to 2.5:1 assuming you have a 3:1 final drive will have a nearly identical effect.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
The 700R4 is cheaper to rebuild and upgrade than the Mercedes trans, but then it needs repair more often. I rebuilt one for a friend's K5 blazer, and at 80k it was trashed inside. First and second were ok, it slipped like crazy in direct and OD though, once I got it apart there was almost no clutch material left, all the steels were blued horribly. That was with a stock 350 in front of it.
On the other hand, can you find a 2.5 rear gear for this car? |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
napabavarian,
I think the conclusion math is wrong: 4:1 x 3:1 == 12:1 overall first gear. To adjust a 3:1 on the 700R4 for the same launch you'll need a 4:1 rear end. Based on the final drive ratio, the 3.69 from a 240D should be pretty close. <3 % 0.8 = 3.75>.
__________________
--frankb 1982 300TD 617.912 <NLA> . 1975 2002 E10-EFI . 1976 914c6 . 1983 MG LMIII <NLA>. 1988 Montero / 616<NLA> . 2001 TLS . 2005 Saab 9-5 Wagon |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
the difference of course is the locking torque converter. the MB trans does not have it, so putting in a 2.5 rear gear would introduce more slip in the TC!
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread "as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do! My drivers: 1987 190D 2.5Turbo 1987 190D 2.5Turbo 1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!! 1987 300TD 1987 300TD 1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere! |
Bookmarks |
|
|