Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2011, 03:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast Vermont
Posts: 115
Timing adjustment methods

Hi all,

I have a question regarding injection timing adjustment methods. In the Haynes manual, it instructs to use the drip method. I talked to one of my friends who is a 3rd generation diesel mechanic (not a weekend mechanic like myself) and he was very much against the drip method, citing that it can be very inaccurate compared to using a diesel timing light. I always cross reference anything I hear or read regarding Mercedes diesels with this forum, so I am interested to hear what peoples' input is about the drip test vs. using a timing light.

Thanks!

Bryan
__________________
1984 240D Euro 5 Speed 201,000 miles
1984 300D Euro 4 Speed (runs great but ugly)
1984 300TD 185,000 miles
1985 300TD, 240,000 miles
1972 220D, 240,000 miles w/ a stuck odometer
1984 300D, 214,000 miles
1984 300TD, 255,000 miles rustbucket parts car
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2011, 03:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
If you have a diesel timing light.. which I assume also involves the sensor which clamps onto the metal injection pump line ... go for it.
If not, the Factory Shop Manual shows using the drip method to set the IP.
Do not use the ' bubble up ' method... at least drip size has some basis in physics in order to standardize the procedure... ' bubbling up' does not.
All this stuff is well discussed in the archives also...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2011, 03:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast Vermont
Posts: 115
where can I get a factory shop manual? all I have is the Haynes, which is helpful, but I would like some more detail. My other vehicle is an 89 Dodge w250 diesel, and I have the two volume factory service manual for it, which is extremely helpful.
__________________
1984 240D Euro 5 Speed 201,000 miles
1984 300D Euro 4 Speed (runs great but ugly)
1984 300TD 185,000 miles
1985 300TD, 240,000 miles
1972 220D, 240,000 miles w/ a stuck odometer
1984 300D, 214,000 miles
1984 300TD, 255,000 miles rustbucket parts car
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-02-2011, 04:27 PM
scottmcphee's Avatar
1987 w124 300D
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 1,539
Gosh, I just time by ear and double-check my work with the butt dyno.
If I wanted to get real fancy I'd borrow a G-tech and fine tune some runs for optimal 0-60 times, but meh... it's not a race car.
__________________
Cheers!
Scott McPhee

1987 300D
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2011, 07:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by bplust View Post
where can I get a factory shop manual? all I have is the Haynes, which is helpful, but I would like some more detail. My other vehicle is an 89 Dodge w250 diesel, and I have the two volume factory service manual for it, which is extremely helpful.
it would really be of great help...if someone upload the links to the manual...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2011, 11:53 AM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by hesterfoster80 View Post
it would really be of great help...if someone upload the links to the manual...
Mercedes Service Manual Source, CD/DVD/Paper
Mercedes Service Manual Source, CD/DVD/Paper





.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-03-2011, 04:48 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by bplust View Post
where can I get a factory shop manual? all I have is the Haynes, which is helpful, but I would like some more detail. My other vehicle is an 89 Dodge w250 diesel, and I have the two volume factory service manual for it, which is extremely helpful.
The Mercedes shop manuals are split into several volumes... one engine, one climate control, one electrical, and usually two for chassis/body. The print manuals have been unavailable new for years, but you can find them on eBay (for a small fortune). Click here to see one that just sold for cheap... that's what you're looking for, assuming you have an 82-85 OM617 turbo.

There are also the manuals available on CD-ROM, click here to see what it looks like. Basically it is the printed manuals scanned into PDF format with a really bad Flash interface / menu. Fortunately someone came up with a much better menu that you can use with the discs, click here to download the appropriate one. Note that the Indexes are just that - you still need to buy the discs to use with the nice HTML index.


About the IP timing methods. If you have a pump with the RIV port, that is the easiest / best method to use, preferably with the A-B light box, or the lock tool (in a pinch). Pumps without the RIV port have to use the "wet" methods (drip/bubble) unless you have an inductive pickup light system AND know what specs to use, as the numbers will be totally different from both the factory methods.


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:52 AM
Stevo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NW WA
Posts: 6,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by leathermang View Post
If you have a diesel timing light.. which I assume also involves the sensor which clamps onto the metal injection pump line ... go for it.
If not, the Factory Shop Manual shows using the drip method to set the IP.
Do not use the ' bubble up ' method... at least drip size has some basis in physics in order to standardize the procedure... ' bubbling up' does not.
All this stuff is well discussed in the archives also...
Greg
The bubble method was described by the late Marshell Booth" as being "more accurate than it needs to be"
__________________


1985 Euro 240D 5 spd 140K
1979 240D 5 spd, 40K on engine rebuild
1994 Dodge/Cummins, 5 spd, 121K
1964 Allice Chalmers D15 tractor
2014 Kubota L3800 tractor
1964 VW bug

"Lifes too short to drive a boring car"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-02-2011, 05:07 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by bplust View Post
Hi all,

I have a question regarding injection timing adjustment methods. In the Haynes manual, it instructs to use the drip method. I talked to one of my friends who is a 3rd generation diesel mechanic (not a weekend mechanic like myself) and he was very much against the drip method, citing that it can be very inaccurate compared to using a diesel timing light. I always cross reference anything I hear or read regarding Mercedes diesels with this forum, so I am interested to hear what peoples' input is about the drip test vs. using a timing light.

Thanks!

Bryan
The '85, unlike the older engines, has a port on the side of the IP to allow the use of the OE factory tool commonly known as the "A-B lights". This simple device has a pair of lights that signal when a reference point inside the IP reaches the probes and closes the circuit between the two lights. At this point, the IP is at a known position. This position should be 15° AFTER TDC on the crankshaft.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:21 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 57,896
Random Thoughts:
I am not speaking about the A-B lights; but from what I have read about the generic Diesel Timing Lights You have to already have your Fuel Injection Pump timed correctly.
Hook up your Timing Light and see what it does.

Once you have the specs you can now use them the next time you use your Diesel Timing Light.

As far as Drip Timing not being accurate; at least in the past all most all inline Fuel Injection Pumps were Drip Timed (Flow Timed). The exception is where some companies use a Timing Pin (CAT does this).

When an inline Fuel Injection pump is rebuilt each one of the Elements is drip timed to the proper degrees of Fuel Injection Pump Camshaft rotation before the Pump is calibrated. The exception is where some companies specify a Dial Indicator or Depth Micrometer reading ad such-and-such Camshaft position (CAT does this) on the Element Plunger.



The inaccurate part of Drip Timing comes from the manuals not being entirely detailed about the procedure and not keeping a constant Fuel Supply pressure.

Also it requires a little understanding of what is going on inside the Fuel Injection Pump concerning the Begin of Injection how that is related to the x number of drips per second when you time it.

And, then there is that it may just take some practice.

I think another problem with doing a Drip Timing for the first time is that people simply rotate the Fuel Injection pump too far or turn it the wrong direction and sort of get lost for a while (put some reference marks before you rotate the Fuel Injection Pumps so you can get it back close to where you started).
Assuming that your Fuel Injection Pump is a few degrees late in timing due to Timing Chain/Gear/Stretch/Wear the Fuel Injection Pump only needs to be nudged a little bit in rotation to bring it back into timing.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel

Last edited by Diesel911; 01-03-2011 at 01:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-03-2011, 02:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
Random Thoughts:
The inaccurate part of Drip Timing comes from the manuals not being entirely detailed about the procedure and not keeping a constant Fuel Supply pressure.
I agree with your whole post.. but this is really true. The FSM does not give a pressure needed or a way to get that pressure.. At one time we discussed putting a can of diesel a specified number of feet above the IP to try to standardize this procedure.

"The bubble method was described by the late Marshell Booth" as being "more accurate than it needs to be"----Stevo

Well Stevo, all I can say is that according to my analysis of the physics involved..And the fact that the people who MADE the car suggest the drip method...I am sorry he died holding onto that opinion..and sharing it with others..

The flow rate which causes similar viscosity fluids ( hopefully exactly the same grade diesel--- but temperature will have an effect also ) to form drips is way more accurate and reproducible in trying to duplicate the size of the opening in the IP than spill rate or bubbles bubbling up from a hole.

If that was true that that method produced ' excess' accuracy... then think how close to perfect we can get it using the FACTORY SHOP MANUAL APPROVED METHOD....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-03-2011, 04:24 PM
Stevo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NW WA
Posts: 6,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by leathermang View Post

"The bubble method was described by the late Marshell Booth" as being "more accurate than it needs to be"----Stevo

Well Stevo, all I can say is that according to my analysis of the physics involved..And the fact that the people who MADE the car suggest the drip method...I am sorry he died holding onto that opinion..and sharing it with others..
Greg, I'm sure your "analysis of the physics involved" in the IP timing procedure is more accurate than that of Dr Booth's, but here is a copy of page one of his five page post on IP timing. Anyone with a spare IP can easily try this on the work bench. But of course if you believe nothing outside the FSM is valid...


Date: Wed, 03 Jul2002 12:36:38 -0400
From: Marshall Booth
Subject: Re: [DIESEL] IP Timing
Mike, Here are several ways to time the pump (its almost NEVER out of
time except by about 1/2 the amount of chain stretch you have and that
usually isn't any problem until the chain needs to be replaced). The
bubble method is the easiest!
I'll include all 3 WAYS that I know of to do it.
> Bubble method!
>>
On the subject of diesel timing. If you are replacing the pump or
> rebuil~in~ t~e engine. The si~plest ~nd.m.ost accurate. way of setting the
> pump IS. \R.!?connect the fuel line gOlng).Q!Qt.he.EumQfrC?mthe filter. ,
> Take the spring and plunger out of #1 delivery valve, put the delivery
> valve back in and snug it down, hold the the pump linkCjlgein the full
> open position. If you have the drip tube install it on the delivery
> valve, if not use the injector line in such a way that it is pointing
> away from the engine. It you don't mind the taste of diesel you can blow
> through the fuel line or use low air pressure. Put the open end of the
> injector line in a glass of water and watch the bubbles. Turn the engine
> slowly until the bubbles stop and check the timing mark. After
> tightening the pump recheck. This method is really more precise than it
> needs to be and although it may sound complicated it is very easy.

>
>
__________________


1985 Euro 240D 5 spd 140K
1979 240D 5 spd, 40K on engine rebuild
1994 Dodge/Cummins, 5 spd, 121K
1964 Allice Chalmers D15 tractor
2014 Kubota L3800 tractor
1964 VW bug

"Lifes too short to drive a boring car"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-04-2011, 01:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevo View Post
Greg, I'm sure your "analysis of the physics involved" in the IP timing procedure is more accurate than that of Dr Booth's, .... a But of course if you believe nothing outside the FSM is valid...
It is not unusual for people to run across someone they elevate to ' Guru ' status ...then accept what they say not matter what evidence is offered to the contrary.

Why did you not address the ' flaw ' in my description of the physics of being able to reproduce the flow rate on other IPs by utilizing the amazing uniformity of size of drops formed by the same viscosity fluid at different locations ?

Why would those people WHO MADE THE CAR risk their reputations by recommending in the FACTORY SHOP MANUAL the drip method IF some other easier more accurate method was so obvious ?

Does not compute.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-04-2011, 03:37 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 474
The bubble method isn't accurate by any means. The drip tube is very easy so why bother risking using some shade-tree method instead of the factory developed method?

I mean, its a tube and you move the pump until you get 1drop/sec, how much easier can it possibly get? I consider it a step in difficulty above changing the alternator belt.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-15-2011, 02:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 738
A-B port location on 84 300SD

Where is the port for the A-B timing device located on the IP?

Thanks,
Jeff
__________________
1984 300SD 300,000 miles--two tank WVO setup
2.88 diff & 500SEL anti-squat rear end
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page