![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Problem is that we are adding parts from different cycle designs and who knows what the result will be. Optimized condensor geometry does likely pay dividends. Question is if it will make a difference in a system of different other components.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 2008 ML320 CDI (199k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Are most modern 134a systems TXV or orifice tube?
I might need a garbage bag for all this ***** before it's over ![]() I did think about measuring the volume with liquid but a smart guy could use math... Figure out the tube length/diameter for the old one, figure the header tube length/diameter for the new one and do the volume. Then estimate the volume of the tubes on the new one. Word on the street seems to say they work.
__________________
My occupational hazard bein' my occupation's just not around... 1980 300SD 1980 300SD |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I'm just glad you tackled this before I got to it! Seriously, I'm pulling for you, 'cause I really don't have any urge to put an r4 back on my rig!
__________________
'82 300SD - Somewhere over 220k - Becoming reliable... |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|