I don't think the table is correct. The sedan/wagon driveshafts vs coupe driveshafts have different placement of the center bearing. Also the total length of the coupe driveshaft is shorter.


.

__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System

EXCLUDING COUPES, Do you think that the center bearing point is common or constant for all sedans and their various flavors of drive trains ?? I would probably cry if the DS I am geting made would not fit. I am of the understadning that the smaller front piece is the only different sized or variable out there. Right now, I am aware of 3 different sizes: 300D with auto trans, 300D with manual trans, and the 240D (I only got the auto DS as an example). Assuming this is correct, then that's really the end of the possibilities.

I am pretty confident that the standard setup single center bearing driveshaft of the sedans and wagons have the same center bearing placements. So the rear shafts are the same length.


.

__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System

I don't know without measuring my coupe out back but for some reason I always thought the distance from the center bearing to the tranny was the same on the coupe and the rear shaft is shorter.

__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.

I get the impression that all of the diesel W123s be it a wagon, sedan or coupe had the larger diameter rear section and the "centre" bearing at the same distance from the differential.

I think that only the front prop shaft sections were changed to suit the transmissions and engine positions.

If you look back at 200T's BW thread you can see a picture of a gasser prop shaft that not only has a different diameter but also the centre bearing in a different position too. Yet more proof that the bear chested manliness of a diesel requires bigger beefier bits!

__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!

Anyone have this picture to place in this thread?

And to add to the "sleeper" digression above, we also must consider the definition of "Sleeper cell" quite common in the news today, as well as the other applicable automotive definition of a vehicle with space for someone to get a good rest, or to sleep. Clearly these two suggestions are not what was mentioned above, but I thought it important if a word is being defined based on cultural use.

I agree that with respect to automotive culture, a "Sleeper" is a vehicle that someone would not assume offers up any performance attributes simply based upon it's appearance or known typical uses, but rather surprisingly, performs beyond these stigma or preconceptions. Any W123 that offers performance on par with a nondescript basic car today, might fall into this category as "sleeper", since it's performance value is fairly low by today's standards. That being said, it's appeal is legendary !

__________________
85 300D 3 pedal. Current project.
83 300TD (need rear wiper assembly dead or alive)
84 300SD Daily driver
85 300TD almost 400k miles and driven daily.
98 E300D *sold
86 300SDL *sold and made flawless 10 hour journey to new home.