Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2015, 12:54 AM
VW1300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Just west of Baltimore
Posts: 465
Effect of running A/C on mileage

The weather is warming up here in TX - am running A/C most of the time now. My mileage seems to be dropping a little, but it bounces around between 26 and 31 anyway.

For those of you who keep track of mpg - how much does running the A/C affect your mileage numbers?

Thanks,

__________________
Charlie

---------------------------
'66 VW 1300 96K miles
'97 E300D 239K miles
'85 300D 203K miles (sold Sep 2012)


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2015, 10:58 AM
Diesel Preferred
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 2,788
I haven't really seen any difference. I'm convinced that the increased aerodynamic drag of opening the windows and sunroof will increase fuel consumption more that the AC will.
__________________
Respectfully,
/s/
M. Dillon
'87 124.193 (300TD) "White Whale", ~392k miles, 3.5l IP fitted
'95 124.131 (E300) "Sapphire", 380k miles
'73 Balboa 20 "Sanctification"
Charleston SC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2015, 11:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 115
The AC on my 220D has never worked, but I'm hoping to do a Sanden conversion at some point over the summer and I'll let you know! I've been tracking my mileage on it with Fuelly for nearly 3 years now.
__________________
1963 Ford Falcon Convertible
1972 220D 4-speed
1986 190D 2.5 5-speed
1999 300D
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2015, 12:18 PM
is thinning the herd
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxbumpo View Post
I haven't really seen any difference. I'm convinced that the increased aerodynamic drag of opening the windows and sunroof will increase fuel consumption more that the AC will.
I've read studies that this is true.

Winter diesel does worse on mileage because of the blend, so when you switch to better fuel, but using the AC, for me its generally a wash.

My girlfriend seems to pick up 1-2 mpg in the 190D in the spring and fall when the windows are up and the A/C is off, but not necessarily on winter blend fuel.
__________________
68 280SL - 70 280SL - 70 300SEL 3.5 - 72 350SL - 72 280SEL 4.5 - 72 220 - 72 220D - 73 450SL - 84 230GE - 87 200TD - 90 190E 2.0 - 03 G500

Nissan GTR - Nissan Skyline GTS25T - Toyota GTFour - Rover Mini - Toyota Land Cruiser HJ60 - Cadillac Eldorado - BMW E30 - BMW 135i
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2015, 12:19 PM
compu_85's Avatar
Cruisin on Electric Ave.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 5,234
Windows down uses a lot more fuel than AC on newer cars. On our older cars I'd say it's mostly as wash below 50 mph.

-J
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket

Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states!
Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels.
2014 Cadillac ELR
2013 Fiat 500E.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2015, 12:28 PM
Simpler=Better's Avatar
Ham Shanker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxbumpo View Post
I haven't really seen any difference. I'm convinced that the increased aerodynamic drag of opening the windows and sunroof will increase fuel consumption more that the AC will.
In my truck I get 26-28 with the window down. I get 30-32 with the windows up. But the AC is busted, so there's no way I'm cooking
__________________
$60 OM617 Blank Exhaust Flanges
$110 OM606 Blank Exhaust Flanges
No merc at the moment
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2015, 04:19 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
I run the center vents wide open with ac off for cooling. I get around 40... haven't needed ac yet with the car...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2015, 05:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington, NC by the Atlantic ocean
Posts: 2,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxbumpo View Post
I haven't really seen any difference. I'm convinced that the increased aerodynamic drag of opening the windows and sunroof will increase fuel consumption more that the AC will.

Max is right. When I was with the EPA I was a team member at the TRC track in Ohio (now owned by Honda) and we ran instrumented cars on a defined driving schedule on the track. One of the things we tested was the AC on vs. windows down thing. There was definitely a point where the AC on beat windows down every time. That point varied with the drag (air resistance) of the body in question. Most pickups found their AC "happy place" around 45 MPH, most cars about 35 or so. There are a ton of variables including tire type and so on. Before anyone asks, we only ran in very limited ambient conditions and we waited frequently for the wind speed to drop, the temp to warm up, etc. One of the biggest issues with on-road testing is attaining repeatable conditions.

I can easily bore you with WAY more than you ever wanted to know about this stuff!

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-16-2015, 05:49 PM
Lucas's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,204
Effect of running A/C on mileage

2014 Nissan Versa. 1.5 mpg drop with AC. Windows closed either way.

The Benz? No idea as the AC pump is located on the work bench...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2015, 06:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,540
1-2 mpg on modem cars with A/C. The converse is not true, you get it for free or almost free on heat. Would expect to be the same for older cars. This is obvious as you do not get something for nothing. I will take the loss any time in SoCal.
__________________
Not MBZ nor A/C trained professional but a die-hard DIY and green engineer. Use the info at your own peril. Picked up 2 Infractions because of disagreements. NOW reversed.

W124 Keyless remote, PM for details. http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-used-parts-sale-wanted/334620-fs-w124-chasis-keyless-remote-%2450-shipped.html

1 X 2006 CDI
1 x 87 300SDL
1 x 87 300D
1 x 87 300TDT wagon
1 x 83 300D
1 x 84 190D ( 5 sp ) - All R134 converted + keyless entry.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-17-2015, 01:14 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,843
The biggest woe with ac is noticed with performance cars. The ac will limit rev freedom...
Most have an ac cutout switch when fully accelerated, but if full pedal travel isn't made, the drag from the pump is serious.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-17-2015, 03:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech View Post
The biggest woe with ac is noticed with performance cars. The ac will limit rev freedom...
Most have an ac cutout switch when fully accelerated, but if full pedal travel isn't made, the drag from the pump is serious.
I think the OP is asking for mileage impact.
__________________
Not MBZ nor A/C trained professional but a die-hard DIY and green engineer. Use the info at your own peril. Picked up 2 Infractions because of disagreements. NOW reversed.

W124 Keyless remote, PM for details. http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-used-parts-sale-wanted/334620-fs-w124-chasis-keyless-remote-%2450-shipped.html

1 X 2006 CDI
1 x 87 300SDL
1 x 87 300D
1 x 87 300TDT wagon
1 x 83 300D
1 x 84 190D ( 5 sp ) - All R134 converted + keyless entry.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-17-2015, 08:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 520
603 Motor A/C = 2 to 3 MPG off Non A/C MPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by VW1300 View Post
The weather is warming up here in TX - am running A/C most of the time now. My mileage seems to be dropping a little, but it bounces around between 26 and 31 anyway.

For those of you who keep track of mpg - how much does running the A/C affect your mileage numbers?

Thanks,
I find that my 603 SDL drops 2 to 3 MPG when the A/C is on.

Just comparing mileage on years of monthly 800 to 1,500 mile trips around the Southwest during winter vs. summer.

I also hear that the turbo does not compress hot air i.e. @ 100*f + as well as in cooler conditions i.e. 65*f. So along with compressor drag that may factor in.

There also seems to be a noticeable power performance drag with the A/C on. When in AZ during the summer at 110*f I occasionally click off the A/C when merging onto the freeway...very noticeable power increase with out the A/C.
__________________

1986 300SDL 440,xxx
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-17-2015, 09:19 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,560
On a '96 Ford Contour 4 cyl, about 2 mpg loss on highway. I do not know on my '81 MB 240D. I do think the older York and GM compressors have a bigger loss. The OP did not state which MB that had a 2 mpg loss. I do not know or can comment on AC vs windows down. I would think AC beats windows down (2-55 AC). I never did a MPG in my Bricklin with a York compressor. The HP drop was noticeable, as I remember. I did notice an HP drop on the Contour, but not as much.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-17-2015, 11:31 PM
VW1300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Just west of Baltimore
Posts: 465
Thanks to all who replied. I was asking about mileage, and my '97 in particular - noticed a mileage drop from 30 to 28 or so right around the time I started using A/C. I've only been tracking my mileage for a year and don't really have complete data. But a drop of 2 mpg sounds reasonable, especially with a fair amount of city and stop and go I sometimes do. I noticed today that the A/C on the right side blows colder than the driver's side, so I need to start reading up on the duovalve repair.

My old '85 on the other hand - when the A/C worked - returned a steady 22-23 mpg on 100% biodiesel whether I ran the A/C or not, no matter if I drove mainly city or highway miles.

__________________
Charlie

---------------------------
'66 VW 1300 96K miles
'97 E300D 239K miles
'85 300D 203K miles (sold Sep 2012)


Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page