![]() |
|
|
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Im pretty sure it isnt and they do, right? Is the pre chamber thing a stretch? I agree there is a chance this all may be skirting around an engine rebuild, but as you say its a process; so far a 3-400$ and many a full day process with nary a smoking gun. Im going to have this dude double check the pre chamber, compression, and do a leak down... I spent a lot of time and $ restoring this car last summer. Before that, my experience stopped at pumping fuel. Thanks to this forum I put 20k great miles on this thing. Will follow up...
__________________
1985 300CD-T W123.153 OM617.952 494 California ![]() |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If you start throwing money at repair shop diagnostics, you might end up spending what you could have replaced the engine with. Sometimes that's just the better course. I hope it doesn't turn out that way.
__________________
'79 240D |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Paying a shop $220 to diagnose a serious engine problem is reasonable. They are probably especially leery if they know that you have been attempting to diagnose / repair the problem yourself (in their minds, you are incapable and they likely think that you have made things worse). If they were the only shop that worked on the car, (and you didn't do any repairs yourself) and they were very familiar with it, then they might diagnose the problem for free because you're a good customer and they have a good idea of the baseline condition of the engine.
A compression test and a leak-down test take time, and time is money.
__________________
Respectfully, /s/ M. Dillon '87 124.193 (300TD) "White Whale", ~392k miles, 3.5l IP fitted '95 124.131 (E300) "Sapphire", 380k miles '73 Balboa 20 "Sanctification" Charleston SC |
#94
|
||||
|
||||
"Yes, the pre-chamber thing is a stretch."
Maybe, maybe not. It is getting fuel with good spray, it has 290 psi compression, it is getting air, it should fire if all that is getting into the cylinder. I did think about the compression reading which would indicate #2 pre chamber is not blocked before posting about looking at the pre chamber. Is it possible that #2 pre chamber holes are mostly blocked with carbon and hindering combustion but still allowing a compression reading? All it needs it a small opening for a compression reading which may not be enough for combustion. Looking at your pics, #2 ball is intact but the other one looks like it's missing? The pics are not good enough to see if it is packed with carbon or not. To see well into it, the retainer ring may have to come off. mach4 has a recent post on pre chambers with lot's of exc. pics. Verify #2 compression is indeed 290 psi, also do a wet test by adding a teaspoon of oil, if psi goes up, the rings are leaking. Compression test readings can be misleading per a well respected machinist who do a lot of VW TDI heads. He has seen engines with stuck/ carboned up rings or broken rings produce perfectly good compression readings. A leak down test will give you more data as to where it is leaking. Agree that it is better to diy rather than pay a shop to do the diagnosis.
__________________
85 300D turbo pristine w 157k when purchased 167,870 July 2025 83 300 D turbo 297K runs great. SOLD! 83 240D 4 spd manual- parted out then junked |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Current Stable
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Compression: 1) 360 2) 260 3) 340 4) 340 5) 360
Leak-down: 1) 52% 2) 44% 3) 28% 4) 44% 5) 52% This is not telling me anything, really. Pretty frustrated but trying to methodically solve still. I think Im going to have the timing checked. The shop didnt check the pre-chamber. Thoughts, comments? Any ideas on the nss repeatedly failing?
__________________
1985 300CD-T W123.153 OM617.952 494 California ![]() Last edited by kalikar85; 06-20-2015 at 01:12 AM. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Basically we go back to my amateur status here with this. Less leak down in my mind than other cylinders showing more compression plus higher leak down rates on the same engine. Really gets me thinking right or wrong. Someone has to check the valve items for that cylinder. It requires a fresh air working intake source through the intake valve to get oxygen every other stroke. Plus the abiity to get rid of the cylinders contents through an opening exhaust valve. If the valves prove to be opening on manual rotation of the engine. . I would next pull the number two injector. Have a good visual inspection of the pre chamber. If it looks decent run the engine for a shot period with the injector connected outside the engine. Just to make sure the injection pump is still providing the ability to spray at idle speeds. For example a element in an injection pump might deliver fuel at cranking speed and not at idle speed. Highly unlikely but something is wrong. The valve check is first though. This is a long shot but still the cylinder is not operating for some reason. I also would do a volume collected spray test of two of the injectors simultainiously at cranking speed. This to make sure the injection pump element is producing enough fuel. Too little fuel and the cylinder will not run. I would not waste my time effort or money at this time doing the injection pump to engine timing. Professional mechanics skills vary so much it is hard to tell on a keyboard what skill level the guys you are using have. If this has not been done yet by you or them it raises questions. Actually your compression numbers and the results of the leak down are at least to me indicative of a valve for that cylinder may not be opening as a possibility. Or there is not enough fuel reaching that cylinder to run. But if that was really the case the cylinder would in all likelihood show a more typical compression number. Unless the raw fuel broke down the carbon. Remember though I am not a working mechanic. Yet over the years seemingly have always still been able to deal with mechanical issues. Usually I substitute common tests and on occasion develop my own tests possibly even original tests sometimes to establish what is going on. This at least partially compensates for the kind of intuitive thing real working mechanics develop. The problem today though we seem to have developed a lot of mechanics that do not seem to have the intuitive abilities of the older mechanics. .. Real pre chamber issue checks other than basically a visual one with an injector removed are beyond my knowledge level. Maybe it is just me but my slight intuitive abilities about the number two cylinder. It may have a lot less carbon in it compared to the other cylinders. Something just does not seem right to me. Less or similar leak down should have produced more equal compression results. I know the leak down test indication to me is far from conclusive as there are a few other senarios I though of. Still It also makes me doubt that there is an injection pump issue or injector issue with that cylinder. Almost everything you have posted made me me think that checking the valve mechanism for that cylinder earlier and now to me there is even more reasons in my mind to do it. Or inoperative intake valve restricting the amount of air input available to compress. Sorry about the length of this post. I can also be wrong. Keep at it as well. I do not visualse a really expensive issue yet. Last edited by barry12345; 06-20-2015 at 11:56 AM. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, do you know any good ones in SF bay area? This guy was recommended for mercedes diesels.
If you read back I already checked the injector. Heres a list of what I have left to check. Maybe someone can chime in with likelyhood, and add others to the list that Im not aware of. Fuel pressure Timing chain tensioner Timing Pre chamber What internal engine/mechanical parts are able to fail without affecting compression?
__________________
1985 300CD-T W123.153 OM617.952 494 California ![]() |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Worth noting that FSM states that allowable total pressure loss is 25%, 10% on the valves or head gasket, and 20% on the rings. Sounds like a pretty tired engine.
Seems odd to me that your mechanic would just give you the data without offering an interpretation, or at least an opinion on what might be causing the uneven compression/ leak down. Did he really have nothing to say? Is this mechanic not interested in fixing this car? Ordinarily, the diagnosis develops from carefully listening to where the air is going. That's sort of the whole point of the exercise. So was that leakage going out the exhaust, the intake, the crankcase, or through another cylinder? If the indications are worn rings, then it's probably not worth doing anything more. But, if all of your valves are leaking, it might be possible to bring it back to good health.
__________________
'79 240D |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Right, so the mechanic said that it was not escaping from the valves or the head gasket from which one can deduce it is leaking out the cylinder as a result of a cracked piston or piston ring. He suggested that the next step would be to pull the head off and inspect the cylinder for scoring.
__________________
1985 300CD-T W123.153 OM617.952 494 California ![]() |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
'79 240D |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
see the guts
kalicar85:
fyi I am in palo alto and have a dissassembled 617.952 all cleaned up and machined, so if you're curious to see what the internals look like in hand, you're welcome to drop by. There are other projects ahead of it, so I won't be assembling it for a while. When it gets started, I'll be posting a lot of newby questions to this forum. Stuart |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|