Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2018, 09:43 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Installed new engine shocks, are the rubber spacers oriented correctly?

On the 1984 300T, just completed installation of both new Lemforder motor mounts and new engine shocks. Are the rubber spacers oriented correctly?

Attached Thumbnails
Installed new engine shocks, are the rubber spacers oriented correctly?-300d-engine-shocks-005.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2018, 11:23 PM
Shadetree
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Back in SC upstate
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
On the 1984 300T, just completed installation of both new Lemforder motor mounts and new engine shocks. Are the rubber spacers oriented correctly?
It appears not.

Attached Thumbnails
Installed new engine shocks, are the rubber spacers oriented correctly?-engine-shocks.jpg  
__________________
84 300SD
85 380SE
83 528e
95 318ic
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2018, 09:59 AM
vwnate1's Avatar
Diesel Dandy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sunny So. Cal. !
Posts: 7,718
A prime example of why one should do one side at a time and/or take photos _before_ taking things apart....
__________________
-Nate
1982 240D 408,XXX miles
Ignorance is the mother of suspicion and fear is the father

I did then what I knew how to do ~ now that I know better I do better
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2018, 11:15 AM
Diseasel300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 6,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwnate1 View Post
A prime example of why one should do one side at a time and/or take photos _before_ taking things apart....
And also listen when multiple forum members tell him the same thing repeatedly!
__________________
Current stable:
1995 E320 149K (Nancy)
1983 500SL 120K (SLoL)

Black Sheep:
1985 524TD 167K (TotalDumpster™)

Gone but not forgotten:
1986 300SDL (RIP)
1991 350SD
1991 560SEL
1990 560SEL
1986 500SEL Euro (Rusted to nothing at 47K!)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2018, 11:41 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
In the steel body there is a hole the bottom of the shock goes through. There appears to be a round "indent" about the same diameter as the metal fender washer that comes with the mercedes shock mounting kit you can easily see and feel with your hands.

It doesn't make sense to place the metal fender washer at the top of the rubber spacer but what do I know?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2018, 08:15 PM
vwnate1's Avatar
Diesel Dandy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sunny So. Cal. !
Posts: 7,718
"It doesn't make sense to place the metal fender washer at the top of the rubber spacer but what do I know?"

Oddly enough, quite possibly more than many here like me with decades of experience, why I always listen to the Newbies explaining how they did it without any clue atall .....

I'm always interested in learning new or different things / ways to get things done .
__________________
-Nate
1982 240D 408,XXX miles
Ignorance is the mother of suspicion and fear is the father

I did then what I knew how to do ~ now that I know better I do better
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2018, 09:59 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
I'm thinking of installing four (4) #46 washers as shown in the diagram on each engine shock. Two at the top and bottom and the other two, one sitting directly on top of the steel body mount and one directly underneath.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-27-2018, 07:36 PM
EJHumber's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Applegate, CA
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
I'm thinking of installing four (4) #46 washers as shown in the diagram on each engine shock. Two at the top and bottom and the other two, one sitting directly on top of the steel body mount and one directly underneath.
and why exactly do you feel its necessary to reinvent the engine shock mounting that has been successfully used on millions of cars?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2018, 09:19 AM
Shadetree
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Back in SC upstate
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
I'm thinking of installing four (4) #46 washers as shown in the diagram on each engine shock. Two at the top and bottom and the other two, one sitting directly on top of the steel body mount and one directly underneath.
That won't make it better but I doubt it will hurt anything. The first failure of this assembly is the damper bearing and, or the shock absorber. That's why the shaft, nuts, washers and rubber buffers are not larger.
__________________
84 300SD
85 380SE
83 528e
95 318ic
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2018, 09:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
I'm thinking of installing four (4) #46 washers as shown in the diagram on each engine shock. Two at the top and bottom and the other two, one sitting directly on top of the steel body mount and one directly underneath.
Steel on steel. Exactly what rubber on steel was intended to avoid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clemson88 View Post
That won't make it better but I doubt it will hurt anything.
Not until there aren't enough threads left to secure the nut.
__________________
When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-28-2018, 10:09 AM
Shadetree
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Back in SC upstate
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Not until there aren't enough threads left to secure the nut.
No comment!
__________________
84 300SD
85 380SE
83 528e
95 318ic
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-28-2018, 12:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,115
Not sure why you are confused. It is that same attachment as a sway bar link in classic U.S. muscle cars (Google Images). You want rubber on both sides of the steel frame. It will work as you installed, but might rattle. Might also extend the shock too far and rip the upper mount.
__________________
1984 & 1985 CA 300D's
1964 & 65 Mopar's - Valiant, Dart, Newport
1996 & 2002 Chrysler minivans
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-28-2018, 03:00 PM
Shadetree
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Back in SC upstate
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillGrissom View Post
Not sure why you are confused. It is that same attachment as a sway bar link in classic U.S. muscle cars (Google Images). You want rubber on both sides of the steel frame. It will work as you installed, but might rattle. Might also extend the shock too far and rip the upper mount.
More likely to shear the rubber bushing when he shuts it off the engine and the jerk causes that little washer to start eating away at the tiny area on which it bears. The idea was to have as large a bearing area on the rubber buffer as possible. The engineers decided (probably didn't even think about it) to use the entire area of the buffer for bearing.

That tells me that the rubber buffers won't take shear, not a little or a lot. Actually, common sense explained it to me and probably most member here. All the engineering carp was for the knuckleheads who need an explanation.
__________________
84 300SD
85 380SE
83 528e
95 318ic
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-28-2018, 06:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 538
OP might not realise there's a slotted hole in one of the "disk washers" which fits onto the shaft so the shock has something to push on, otherwise the washer would be free to do what it likes and the whole thing serves no purpose.
__________________
1978 300D, 373,000km 617.912, 711.113 5 speed, 7.5mm superpump, HX30W turbo...many, many years in the making....
1977 280> 300D - 500,000km+ (to be sold...)
1984 240TD>300TD 121,000 miles, *gone*
1977 250 parts car
1988 Toyota Corona 2.0D *gone*
1975 FJ45>HJ45
1981 200>240D (to be sold...)
1999 Hyundai Lantra 1.6 *gone*
1980s Lansing Bagnall FOER 5.2 Forklift (the Mk2 engine hoist)
2001 Holden Rodeo 4JB1T 2WD

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-28-2018, 08:47 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Changed the rubber washers to their correct orientation today. The engine is smoother, no knocking or clunking when turning off the engine. Still plenty of work to do on this beast!!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page