Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion > Diesel Performance Tuning

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 04-27-2008, 10:41 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
I have not found a $60 system that "does it right" for pre turbo injection. Post turbo is complex- you have to have the proper installation at a suitable post turbo/post IC site.
Pump: $40
Nozzle: $15
Pressure switch: $12
Hose: $10
Tank: Free, share the washer bottle
Total: $77

Suitable means anywhere post turbo and post intercooler. The EGR port, compressor housing, etc.

Don't make it sound complicated. It is very simple.

Quote:
Does steam stay in gaseous form without further heating?
Pumping 212*f steam into 200*f compressed air isn't going to cool anything.

Quote:
I believe both you and I think at this point it may not be worth the time to design, fabricate and install a system based on this.
Wrong, I'm have been working on a port injection system for several weeks. The only thing holding me back is lack of available money.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-29-2008, 08:57 AM
Deni's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tirana, Albania
Posts: 429
If you search for "pre-turbo water injection" in google there are plenty of cases where pre-turbo water injection, if done right, does not harm the propeller blades as commonly thought.

The cases where it did where cases where other objects got into the intake.
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:11 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,197
Is there a way to mist the water without using heat that would work? I know there are cool vaporizers for use in your house. Is there some way to rig up something like that rather than producing steam?
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:30 AM
Deni's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tirana, Albania
Posts: 429
Small nozzle, 100-150psi pressure should do the trick. You don't have to heat the water.
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:41 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It DOES wear damage the wheel by dulling the blade edges. Don't be LAZY, post-turbo injection is the only right way to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:50 AM
Deni's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tirana, Albania
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
It DOES wear damage the wheel by dulling the blade edges. Don't be LAZY, post-turbo injection is the only right way to do it.
Why are you so sure? There are plenty of accounts where people used it without any harm. Even Saab used it.
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:20 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That doesn't mean it didn't do any damage. Any wear on the blade edges will reduce its efficiency and loose it's balance.

There are "plenty of accounts" of people using Lovecraft's system too, that doesn't mean they re right or doing what they should be doing.

Saab is an embarrassment to the automotive industry. Their ONLY good point is they aren't afraid to use turbochargers on production cars.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-29-2008, 11:21 AM
Bajaman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 713
I know this is a lot more complicated, but didn't older diesel engines use water injection ATDC directly to the cylinder? It seems to me, that this would be the best scenario, because you can really utilized the expansion of the phase change. I think that would be pretty sweet to have DI water.
__________________
For Sale: 1982 MB 300TD
1995 Chevrolet Suburban 6.5TD

Sold: 1980 IH Scout Traveler- Nissan SD33T Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-29-2008, 04:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: D.C.
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Saab is an embarrassment to the automotive industry. Their ONLY good point is they aren't afraid to use turbochargers on production cars.
Care to quantify that statement? My brother has an 87 SPG that is a wonderful car to drive, fast, hugs the road, and economy>30mpg to boot... all on 87 octane. Very reasonably priced (far less than my 300TD).. Quite reliable, hardly any maintenance required compared to the benz... My mom drives a GM900S which has proven a very inexpensive car to drive for the last 50k... just oil changes and tires so far.. Once big things start to go bad on them its time to get rid of them, because exhaustive repairs can be pricey, but certainly less of an embarrassment to the automotive industry than, say, GM.. at least in my experience...

As for the pre-turbo WI, seems like a bad idea regardless of the phase the water is in. Seems nearly as bad an idea as running the CCV into the impeller. When I took my turbo apart to rebuild it I got about 1/16-1/8" of encrusted oil sludge out of the housing, which can't be good for airflow...

I wasn't aware older diesels had DI water injection.. That is an awesome idea though, and could be done fairly low-tech. Bruce Crower made a 6-cycle engine recently out of a one-lung diesel that he put a carb on to run on gasoline, and injected water with the injector+IP... I like the idea of injecting H20 ATDC, probably does wonders for emissions too... I wonder if we could get away with installing H2O injectors in the GP holes? Would an IDI diesel have a snowball's hope in hell of starting w/o GPs? Maybe a WD-40 injection system for starting? I bet an EFI common-rail setup like megasquirt or something similar could be constructed fairy simply for the water...
__________________
99 E300 Turbodiesel 100k
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-29-2008, 05:39 PM
patbob's Avatar
Its a Whatsit
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
I have not found a $60 system that "does it right" for pre turbo injection. Post turbo is complex- you have to have the proper installation at a suitable post turbo/post IC site. I don't have such a site unless it's gonna be right at the cylinder entrance- which means I'll have five nozzles. Your previous system may have had this issue. It also means I have to inject much more water- over 500 cc according to many, including your estimates. Reading thru many threads over at WI show the complexities that accompany post turbo, and even pre turbo.
The major issue with pre turbo is the water drop size- causing impeller damage. Steam condenses if it has the distance/time and will still be small enough water droplets that it should not cause this damage. That's the theory, and until it's hashed out, the subject will not be closed or fully explored.
What about those ultrasonic humidifiers that were all the rage back in the mid 1980s? The make such small droplets that they will stay suspended in the air just from brownian motion of the air molecules themselves. You'd need a whole array of the things to atomize water at the rate needed, but it'd be about as abrasive on the turbo vanes as driving through fog. Best part, they don't use tons of power since phase change of the water isn't involved, so you still get the phase change cooling benefit.

I haven't seen them sold as humidifiers in years, but I think the craft stores still sell the equivalant things as fog/mist generators for decorative fountains.

Or you could always generate a heap 'O tiny droplets by bubbling millions of tiny O2 and H2 gas bubbles through some water... Oops.. wrong thread .
__________________
'83 300DTurbo http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/318559.png

Broadband: more lies faster.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deni;
Small nozzle, 100-150psi pressure should do the trick. You don't have to heat the water.
100 psi would be minimum. The nozzle either has to be spraying a cone right onto the nut which is very very difficult to do properly, or it has to be back some distance and spraying the proper direction to not condensate on the intake walls or form larger drops. Some engines have far greater psi pumps that spray under 5um size drops. The amount pre turbo to simulate post turbo effects is much less- I think close to a 1/4. FI is correct- larger drops will degrade your blades. A system pre turbo must have very very small drops sizes- and that is why I am asking about cold steam. The steam is cold to my hand at 6 inches- so it must have lost quite a bit of it's heat. The real question is this- how long does steam hold it's heat, and does steam when it leaves a steamer nozzle condensate to itself with water surface tension and form large drops?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:08 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
how about LOX
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,413
lox? lol...
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-30-2008, 02:07 PM
patbob's Avatar
Its a Whatsit
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon View Post
how about LOX
You'd throw a rod.. or seriously gum up the engine

Some person in a gasser tried that here a few years back by driving through the liquid O2 vapor cloud leaking from a damaged tanker truck. The car was parked about 50 feet past the cloud down the on ramp, and I'd bet they got most of that distance coasting after they threw a rod or whatever
__________________
'83 300DTurbo http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/318559.png

Broadband: more lies faster.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-30-2008, 03:00 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
100 psi would be minimum. The nozzle either has to be spraying a cone right onto the nut which is very very difficult to do properly, or it has to be back some distance and spraying the proper direction to not condensate on the intake walls or form larger drops.
If you are going to have a 100psi pump and atomizing nozzle, don't even bother trying to put it pre-turbo.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page