Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2006, 03:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 112
Why merc switched to 3-valve technology?

Why they "think" that 3 valves per silinder is better than 4, whitch they used before eg. M119 & M120

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2006, 04:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,574
The single exhaust valve per cylinder made for much faster warmup of the catalytic converter. This greatly reduces exhaust emissions. The M112 and M113 are rated LEV engines; very clean running for the time they were introduced.

- JimY
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2006, 04:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 25
4V architecture>3V architecture

I'm sure that 3V is cheaper and better for emissions though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2006, 08:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 112
so this is basically a step-back according to performance?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2006, 03:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 25
Well, yes and no. 4 alve architecture is superior to 3 valve architecture, but one simply having more valves than another does not make a better engine automatically. It is a step back as far as the design goes, but thanks to other changes, a lot of the newer 3v engines are outperforming the older 4v engines.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2006, 12:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 112
well yes, you are right but 99% newer engines (doesent matter what car) give bigger power output. But when i compare 48v 600 (300kw) and 36v 600 (270kw) I see that newer engine hasnt got the same performance, it has even less... twinturbo powerplant doesent suit in to the comparison, cause old 48v twinturbos were never offered (too bad ) altought newer engines are Way economic than old ones I bet...
Ok I got my answer to the question anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-30-2006, 08:17 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tucker, Ga USA
Posts: 12,153
$$$$ was the biggest reason for the change to the 3 valve MB engines!

MB made a good engine for a LOT less $$$ than the 4-valve engines that they were & now are making again!
__________________
MERCEDES Benz Master Guild Technician (6 TIMES)
ASE Master Technician
Mercedes Benz Star Technician (2 times)
44 years foreign automotive repair
27 Years M.B. Shop foreman (dealer)
MB technical information Specialist (15 years)
190E 2.3 16V ITS SCCA race car (sold)
1986 190E 2.3 16V 2.5 (sold)
Retired Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-30-2006, 09:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,726
Agree - they told us the engines were better but they told Wall Street they cut out half the cost.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-17-2006, 05:37 PM
leejxxxxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcyuhn View Post
The single exhaust valve per cylinder made for much faster warmup of the catalytic converter. This greatly reduces exhaust emissions. The M112 and M113 are rated LEV engines; very clean running for the time they were introduced.

- JimY
Does the SOHC 3 valve engine still have variable cam timing?
__________________
Current Crop:
2002 ML500
1997 SL600
1969 Corvette (for sale, perfect shape)
1984 RX7 GSLSE

Wanted:
a diesel MB!
Looking for a new SL.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-20-2006, 08:08 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tucker, Ga USA
Posts: 12,153
No they don't..

__________________
MERCEDES Benz Master Guild Technician (6 TIMES)
ASE Master Technician
Mercedes Benz Star Technician (2 times)
44 years foreign automotive repair
27 Years M.B. Shop foreman (dealer)
MB technical information Specialist (15 years)
190E 2.3 16V ITS SCCA race car (sold)
1986 190E 2.3 16V 2.5 (sold)
Retired Moderator
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page