|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-17-2002, 09:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
M119 CHANGE 4.2 to 5.0
Hello Brothers and Sisters of the Benz,
Does anyone know what the differences are between the two engines, and could a 4.2 be changed to accomidate the bigger displacement? Thank all of you for the knowledge. This web site has given me wealths of informantion, what and experience. I appreciate your time. 
|
|
#2
10-17-2002, 10:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why dont you just put in a lower geared rear end because that would be a lot cheaper than trying to make a 5.0 L engine, but if you are willing and wanting to do that, you should make the car an E60 www.renntechmercedes.com
If you are trying to achieve quickness, then a lower rear end would be the best. Look up SUBMAN he will have a lot to say.
__________________
Current Stable: 1994 S500 v140, 210k miles, white with grey. Former Mercedes in the Stable: 1983 300CD Turbo diesel 515k mi sold (rumor has it, that it has 750k miles on it now) 1984 300CD Turbo Diesel 150 k mi sold 1982 300D Turbo Diesel 225 sold 1987 300D Turbo Diesel 255k mi sold 1988 300 CE AMG Hammer 15k mi sold 1986 "300E" Amg Hammer 88k mi sold (it was really a 200, not even an E (124.020) 1992 500E 156k mi sold etc.
|
|
#3
10-19-2002, 10:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
We have a 2.82 gear ratio for your car (as opposed to the factory 2.24 ratio). We can optimize this for your car.
Regards, Satish BergWerks Mercedes Performance www.bergwerks.com
|
|
#5
10-20-2002, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
You could probably use a 3.07 or a 3.27 one of those came in the 320SL SL320, and the other is in the E320 cabriolet but it depends if you have ASR or not.
__________________
Current Stable: 1994 S500 v140, 210k miles, white with grey. Former Mercedes in the Stable: 1983 300CD Turbo diesel 515k mi sold (rumor has it, that it has 750k miles on it now) 1984 300CD Turbo Diesel 150 k mi sold 1982 300D Turbo Diesel 225 sold 1987 300D Turbo Diesel 255k mi sold 1988 300 CE AMG Hammer 15k mi sold 1986 "300E" Amg Hammer 88k mi sold (it was really a 200, not even an E (124.020) 1992 500E 156k mi sold etc.
|
|
#6
10-25-2002, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was thinking, wouldn't It cost cheeper to just toss in a E55 engine in the 400E than to go with the Renntech? I wanted to know bc I was thinking of doing this in my car, then I would go towards a blower for my car rather than looking for someone to custom make it for the M119's which would probably end up costing the same as the engine swap!
Greetings, Albert S. 
|
|
#7
10-26-2002, 02:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
E55 engine...
Wouldn't you need the transmission and probably the differential as well?
__________________
Rainmaker 93 500E, 43k mi, Pics of upgrade parts Evo II Wheels on Dunlop FM901 235/45x17s 94 Facelift RennTech CF Airbox RennTech ASR Defeat RennTech Chip 1st Gear Start 97 Range Rover 4.6 HSE Vitesse, Yellow, "Tonka" (sold)
|
|
#8
10-26-2002, 03:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yup....I would........I am trying to figure out what I would have to go through to get a "55" engine to work on my car...Its pritty hard since I don't know $hit abth performance & mechanical
 Oh well...
|
|
#9
10-27-2002, 09:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
You would need the ENTIRE longblock, transmission, wiring harness, all computers, CAN bus units, Motronic engine management brain, fuel injection system, transmission control unit, ESP brain control, exhaust, etc., etc.
It would cost you around $30,000 in just parts alone minimum, another $10-$15 in labor. Cheaper to just BUY an E55 from 1999. OR, up your current M119 5.0L to 6.0L for $18K or so from RENNtech. That gets you 408hp and 445 ft/lbs of torque plus a new motor in your car.
|
|
#10
10-28-2002, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
WoW....Thats a lot of $hit
 but renntech want like 32k or so to do a 6.0 convertion..... I guess I'll just start saving money up now untill I have enough for a custom BlowerThanks,
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
