|
|
|
|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
I see that putting a teaspoon of oil in the cylinder raised compression. Is this a test or a small cure? Just curious.
__________________
1984 300SD Orient Red/ Palomino 1989 560SEC 2016 Mazda 6 6 speed manual 1995 Ford F-150 reg cab 4.9 5speed manual |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- ![]() '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
You must do it with the throttle wide open. If you do it with the throttle closed, you are starting the compression stroke at a lower pressure (and with less mass in the cylinder), so the pressure at the end of compression will be lower.
__________________
1987 W201 190D |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bandaid.
__________________
1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15 '06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod) |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's a test. The theory is that a little oil will help seal worn rings, but not burned valves. So if the compression goes up dramatically with oil in the cylinder, it points towards rings/bores, if it does not it points to valves/head gasket. It really only makes sense to try (IMO) if the compression is down to like 75psi when it should be 150+. A leakdown test is much more accurate as you can listen for where the air is escaping.
__________________
1987 W201 190D |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Something definitely off if you can't hit 120 mph in that car. Are your tires stock size? Maybe the speedo is off. Hard to believe the engine would be that worn (they are pretty durable) but perhaps it wasn't taken care of very well. 0-60 should be around 8 seconds.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life- ![]() '15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800) '17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k) '09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k) '13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k) '01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km) '16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k) |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
What year miata are we talking about here? How many miles? Running top up or down (top down is mandatory, of course, but can cost you several MPH at the top end)? Manual or auto tranny (promise not to laugh at you (too terribly much) if it is a slush box)?
A tired early NA (90-93, 1.6L engine) topping out at ~ 105 mph or so wouldn't surprise me at all. Aerodynamics are NOT one of the miata's strong suits (neither is raw horsepower, but that is easily enough changed). A few things to look at..... What size wheels & tires are on your car? Stock set up results in an optimistic speedometer reading from the factory (typically around 10%); if I remember the math right, bigger wheels/tires (i.e. larger diameter) results in a lower speedo reading - so if you're running something bigger than the stock 14" wheels, you'll be reading actual or lower speed. Not to mention the effect that extra unsprung weight has on acceleration..... rolling dub style bling does come at a price. As others have mentioned - re-check compression with the throttle wide open. Any other set up renders your readings meaningless. "Conventional wisdom" says anything more than 10% variance from one cylinder to another means you've got trouble. Timing - what is yours set at? Is a pretty common "tweak" to bump up the timing for a bit more launching power - trade off is a lower top end (doesn't apply to the NB's (1999 and later US, 1998 later elsewhere)). With the engine idling, look at the crankshaft pulley (biggest one, low and centered). If it's wobbling, you may have a potentially big issue - crankshaft bolt failure (search miata.net for short nose crank). Mostly a concern on the earliest 1.6L engines, but possible throughout the range. Typically first noticed as a lack of power from a dead stop, but also kills high RPM power. How old are your plug wires? What color are they (seriously )? Yadas eat plug wires about every 30k miles. Blue (NGK) is the right answer for color.What do your plugs look like? Any hints there? Any engine codes thrown? When was the fuel filter last changed? Plugged catalytic converter is a potential suspect. Any hint of pinging? Vacuum leaks? Shift into 5th gear. These little buggers are running at ~ 4k RPM in fifth cruising down the highway at 80 mph or so. What was the tach telling you when you ran out of top end? These cars ain't drag racers - they'll get outrun by more than a view stock minivans in a straight line. That said, I went from 2001 CLK55 (bought new) to a Miata - and haven't looked back - sure, torque is WONDERFUL, but the sense of actually being engaged in the driving is several orders of magnitude greater in the Miata. Would love to have another speed demon in the fleet someday, but if I had to pick ONE car to drive for the next ten years, it'd be an early Miata.
__________________
1961 220b: first project car - sold. 2000 CLK 430: first modern Benz - sold. 2001 CLK 55: OMG the torque!!! - sold 1972 280SE 4.5: Baby Gustav 1991 300TE 4Matic: Gretel the Snow Bunny - sold 1978 300SD: Katz the Free Man - given away 1980 Redhead: Darling Wife |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know about the dyno information but the way I see this, there is a rather large difference between highest and lowest and even from spec to highest. I think the engine is on the way out. Also, with the difference, I wonder if one cylinder might be pushing it more than the other and cause further wear.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
what you are doing is a static compression and adding oil is at best inconsistent with a real test - the real test is a leak down - what it does is pressurize the cylinder and it takes a real measurement of the amount of loss each cylinder has like 10 % 11% or even 25 % and so on, and as it is doing it you can by removing the oil cap if the rings are at fault than you can hear the air blowing out, or the tail pipe if its an exhaust valve and so on, the test you are doing takes away a real test, meaning the battery condition at the start and the end will be at a different speed sooo, also the total amount of oil added is between a foot and the glove approach, but from what you have written my guess is the motor is tired and worn and a junk yard unit is the best way to go -- just my take we use a leak down on race cars almost every week end to keep tabs on engine condition - jz
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah something like that. They definitely aren't fast in the normal sense. They're very responsive though and lets face it, not very fun to drive in a straight line compared to when you reach a windy backroad. Try one, they're quite an addictive driving experience.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its a 99 sport. 110k miles on its second engine. 65 aspect tires instead of stock 60 aspect so a slight loss in gear for power. I was not close to the redline in fourth so no point in shifting to fifth.
Anyway, its all moot now it now has a 34k mile replacement engine sitting in it from a clean wrecked 99. They are changing all of the rubber suspension bushings and with any luck tomorrow I will go and pick it up. I just was hoping someone had dyno experience so the loss in power might be quantified. I was thinking it might be down about 20 hp from optimal condition, based on a little study I did on the basis of fifties and sixties cadillac motors...(I had complete data on them is the only reason to use them). Thanks for all the comments.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual. [SIGPIC]..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice.. good luck. Hope the third one's a charm. If the car was driven hard there could possibly be an oil starvation issue (on high lateral loads) which would explain 2 crapped out engines.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
All the talk here about the engine being worn out is off the mark until a compression test is performed with a wide open throttle. The engine may or may not be worn, but a closed throttle test is not valid.
__________________
1987 W201 190D |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|