Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:46 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
'Horrifying': Passenger jet dives 1,600 feet to avoid nearby skydiving plane

Some may remember an horrific air collision involving a PSA flight on approach to San Diego and a Cessna 172 in 1978. As a result, the Terminal Collision Avoidance System was developed to help insure that mid air collisions were avoided. The following article shows how the system works in the real world. Notice how the passengers became panicked due to the abrupt dive. The flight crew easily handled the problem while the passengers were overcome with panic. And, as I've stated in earlier posts, it's the panic that will get you killed every time.

Flight Crew = Professionals trained to handle emergencies. Many of them are Ex Military pilots who really can handle just about anything.

Passengers = Panic prone people who will freak out when faced with the slightest out of the ordinary situation.



'Horrifying': Passenger jet dives 1,600 feet to avoid nearby skydiving plane - NBC News.com

Original crash incident which resulted in major changes to air travel.

PSA Flight 182 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:58 PM
Redefining normal daily
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 445
I actually saw the collision of PSA Flight 182 occur.

Was standing on a balcony of the human studies building at San Diego State University, waiting for a World Religions classroom to be opened for my first class of the morning.

Happened to be looking the right way at the right time, saw the flash, then shortly after, the smoke. One of those "I'll never forget where I was" moments.
__________________
1961 220b: first project car - sold.
2000 CLK 430: first modern Benz - sold.
2001 CLK 55: OMG the torque!!! - sold
1972 280SE 4.5: Baby Gustav
1991 300TE 4Matic: Gretel the Snow Bunny - sold
1978 300SD: Katz the Free Man - given away
1980 Redhead: Darling Wife
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:02 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
The system that resulted from the San Diego accident, although an improvement is virtually obsolete today as compared to the replacement technology, ADSB. ADSB is being phased in and will be fully online in 2020.

There are already MANY pieces of ADSB technology in use, relatively economically, even by General Aviation. It is expected to virtually eliminate such events as you point to. Currently very few GA planes have ADSB OUT, which transmits their location and direction to all nearby aircraft. When all planes have ADSB OUT, the avoidance of mid air collisions will be very nearly at a point of total elimination. Even today, it is making our skies safer and is nowhere near total implementation.

With the requirement over six years away, most aircraft owners, myself included, are waiting for affordable ADSB OUT units. It is generally expected that by 2018 or 2019, most all aircraft in the sky will be so equipped, and by 2020, ALL aircraft flying in controlled airspace will be compliant.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Looks like the automatic warning systems did their job, and they got away with needing a few new seat cushions as opposed to 150 caskets.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:23 PM
A Talent for Obfuscation
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In the Deep State
Posts: 17,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
Some may remember an horrific air collision involving a PSA flight on approach to San Diego and a Cessna 172 in 1978. As a result, the Terminal Collision Avoidance System was developed to help insure that mid air collisions were avoided. The following article shows how the system works in the real world. Notice how the passengers became panicked due to the abrupt dive. The flight crew easily handled the problem while the passengers were overcome with panic. And, as I've stated in earlier posts, it's the panic that will get you killed every time.

Flight Crew = Professionals trained to handle emergencies. Many of them are Ex Military pilots who really can handle just about anything.

Passengers = Panic prone people who will freak out when faced with the slightest out of the ordinary situation.



'Horrifying': Passenger jet dives 1,600 feet to avoid nearby skydiving plane - NBC News.com

Original crash incident which resulted in major changes to air travel.

PSA Flight 182 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We are talking about a 1,600 foot emergency dive. Did you expect that the uninformed airplane passengers would be thumbing through their copies of Conde Nast during this event?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:33 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
A side note about the San Diego accident. That accident was covered in a Smithsonian channel series that documents various aircraft accidents. As I recall, their TV production portrayed the small plane as a Piper Cherokee rather than a Cessna 172. Since the TV series seemed to have lots of errors, I believe your wiki. Both are basically the same size and level of performance so it's a moot point, but you would think Smithsonian channel would be more concerned with accuracy.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:37 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
I guess that's why they don't allow the customers to fly the planes, now I know.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-2013, 03:04 PM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Well:

Airliner near-misses prompt call for changes to 'go-around' rules - U.S. News



As to the current incident, one article I read they took to quoting a little kid who shared his worry they were going to crash into the ground and die. The epitome of poor reporting.

I don't doubt that the passengers were caught off-guard. But 1,600' isn't that much and it was controlled, not like when the elevator jack screw strips.

People have a tendency to be panic prone, and quoting little kids doesn't help that one bit.

My other favorite part was that the maneuver "wasn't explained" until after it happened. Hmmm...as a passenger, I'd far rather the crew be focused on resolving the situation. We can chat about it later, after all, but if we worry about talking beforehand, there may not be any "later."

A little rationality and perspective can go a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-02-2013, 03:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post

A little rationality and perspective can go a long way.
You are not getting that from the average person.

That's why the USA is in the current state of affairs that it finds itself. The morons of the world rule the day.

FWIW, the pilots didn't have to do an emergency decent whereby the aircraft is effectively fully unloaded (0g). That's what excites all the idiots.

A push on the yoke that slowly accelerates the aircraft downward over 10 seconds and results in a decent rate of 4000 fpm would achieve the 1600 foot drop in about 30 seconds. More than enough time to avoid a collision.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-02-2013, 03:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
FWIW, the pilots didn't have to do an emergency decent whereby the aircraft is effectively fully unloaded (0g). That's what excites all the idiots.

A push on the yoke that slowly accelerates the aircraft downward over 10 seconds and results in a decent rate of 4000 fpm would achieve the 1600 foot drop in about 30 seconds. More than enough time to avoid a collision.
Spirit flies some variant of the ScareBus 320 -- those have sidesticks not yokes, and would the envelope protection even allow for a 0g descent?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-02-2013, 04:45 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
NASA has an aircraft that dives quickly and allows for zero G's in the interior. In this way Astronauts can see what zero G feels like for a few seconds at a time.

The aircraft is nicknamed 'The Vomit Comet' since this seems to be the reaction of some folks that try this.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-02-2013, 05:04 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Spirit flies some variant of the ScareBus 320 -- those have sidesticks not yokes, and would the envelope protection even allow for a 0g descent?
Good question...........I'd guess that the software would allow something close to 0g but not quite.

Don't want the people flying around the cabin..............although this has definitely occurred in the past.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-02-2013, 05:05 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
NASA has an aircraft that dives quickly and allows for zero G's in the interior. In this way Astronauts can see what zero G feels like for a few seconds at a time.
That's got to hurt when the acceleration turns back towards the positive side..............
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-02-2013, 05:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Good question...........I'd guess that the software would allow something close to 0g but not quite.

Don't want the people flying around the cabin..............although this has definitely occurred in the past.
Better have a few people dead from smashing their heads on the ceiling than all passengers dead from hitting a large object. Much prefer Boeing's control philosophy of soft limits that can be overridden with more force on the yoke.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-02-2013, 05:17 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Back when I used to fly, I always kept my seat belt buckled throughout the flight. If there was turbulence or sudden maneuvers, my head didn't bang into the cabin ceiling.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page