Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 07-13-2013, 03:02 PM
Jorn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TheFlyingDutchManInHollywood
Posts: 7,898
Always those interns, all they are good for is smoking cigars.

__________________
1979 Black on Black, 300CD (sold), 1990 Black 300SE, Silver 1989 Volvo 780, 1988 300CE (vanished by the hands of a girlfriend), 1992 300CE (Rescue).
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-13-2013, 05:07 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorn View Post
Always those interns, all they are good for is smoking cigars.
don't you mean inserting?
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-13-2013, 05:35 PM
The Clk Man's Avatar
Saved By Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Heaven Bound
Posts: 123
I bet their "Fameries" were pissed.
__________________
For the Saved, this world is the worst it will ever get.
For the unSaved, this world is the best it will ever get.

Clk's Ebay Stuff BUY SOMETHING NOW!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-13-2013, 08:13 PM
JordaanDMC-12's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 767
Oh man, whoever put that on the graphics is a gooooooooner.....
__________________
76 MG Midget
78 Datsun 280Z
86 Peugeot 505
01 Subaru Outback

“Owning a car is like owning a dog. Every now and then, it craps on the carpet — but it’s still your dog.” - Jeremy Clarkson
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-13-2013, 10:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,338
And if they were only a summer intern it would have been worth it! What a score! Most news anchors treat interns worse than Saudi domestics.
__________________
“Whatever story you're telling, it will be more interesting if, at the end you add, "and then everything burst into flames.”
― Brian P. Cleary, You Oughta Know By Now
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-14-2013, 01:43 PM
dkveuro's Avatar
Sword of Damocles
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here an' there.
Posts: 2,548
It's reported the airline, ASIANA is to sue the TV company for this. ...as they think it is demeaning to the crew. I think the crew ought to be more concerned about the passengers suing them for jeopardizing their lives.

It is of little concern in the scheme of things that crew are mad at the TV station, considering two people lost their lives in this accident due the PiC and the Sic...flight deck crew.

Unfortunately the names of many sound humorous in English, but in this instance the dark humour used in the TV report was inappropriate and repetition here would be too.

San Francisco Plane Crash: Pilot Had 43 Hours Flying Boeing 777 - ABC News



.
__________________
[http://languageandgrammar.com/2008/01/14/youve-got-problems-not-issues/ ]

"A liberal is someone who feels they owe a great debt to their fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money."
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-15-2013, 03:21 AM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Uh, you know this is a repost, right?

Any mods got a "merge" button?

http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/open-discussion/341195-local-news-station-pranked-wrong-pilots-names.html
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-15-2013, 06:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
I'm not seeing the value in a lawsuit. The airline claims a set of funny sounding prank names makes the airline look bad. While unprofessional and in poor taste, I don't think it has any effect on the reputation of the airline. You know what makes the airline look bad? Crashing a plane full of people on landing badly enough to knock the tail off and kill several people.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-15-2013, 06:46 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
I don't think it has any effect on the reputation of the airline.
Doesn't matter what anybody thinks.

The airline must prove, in a court of law, that it was harmed financially by the TV clip. It must put a dollar value on the damages.

Not very easy to do and convince a jury or a judge.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-15-2013, 06:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,869
So it matters what the jury thinks.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-16-2013, 01:55 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
So it matters what the jury thinks.
I didn't think the judge (in an American law system) could over rule the jury - so yes I think it does matter what the jury thinks.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-16-2013, 09:55 AM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
I didn't think the judge (in an American law system) could over rule the jury - so yes I think it does matter what the jury thinks.
In a criminal matter, depending on state law, a judge can overturn a jury verdict.

In a civil suit, such as this, a judge may throw out or lower a verdict (remittitur) or increase a verdict award via additur. The affect party then has the right to a new trial if they wish to challenge the judge's actions.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-16-2013, 09:57 AM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Doesn't matter what anybody thinks.

The airline must prove, in a court of law, that it was harmed financially by the TV clip. It must put a dollar value on the damages.

Not very easy to do and convince a jury or a judge.
While "actual damages" could be nominal, the station's conduct may satisfy the test for exemplary/punitive damages, which would result in an award to "punish" rather than compensate. The punishment award can be based on the net worth of the broadcasting company.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-16-2013, 10:18 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
While "actual damages" could be nominal, the station's conduct may satisfy the test for exemplary/punitive damages, which would result in an award to "punish" rather than compensate. The punishment award can be based on the net worth of the broadcasting company.
If the plaintiff can't show any direct "actual damages", my thought is that it would be difficult to extract punitive damages.

I'm sure you'll find an exception. Lawyers are good at that.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-16-2013, 10:59 AM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
I'm sure you'll find an exception. Lawyers are good at that.
Brian, I was not commenting on whether a party would be successful, just stating that outrageous conduct can result in a non-compensatory exemplary award. The standard is pretty high, as one may imagine, typically consisting of reckless behavior, to the extent that it "shocks the conscience" of the average person.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page