cmbdiesel |
07-27-2013 02:45 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower
(Post 3182448)
We've gone over this and you apparently ignore the common sense and law itself: you cannot stand your ground when the person you fear is not near you. If you fear for your personal safety nowhere in the law does it say you can run (or walk) from a distance and attack the person. Why does your political view make you ignore items which negate that which you wish were true? :confused:
|
Now you're saying that the Zim wasn't near TM??:confused:
How was he hitting him?? Some sort of secret-ninja-force-distant-punching??
My political view has absolutely nothing to do with having no idea who started the fight.
Neither does yours.
You accept that the Zim was set upon, I do not.
However, I also do not know that the Zim started the fight.
My point, and the point of others who are trying to discuss this with you, is that IF the Zim started the fight, then TM would have been employing self-defense. We will never know for sure.
Furthermore, if TM had beaten the Zim to death (silencing any conflicting story) he would have been fully protected under SYG by declaring himself in fear for his life.
There is no weapon requirement.... gun, shiv, bat, fists... all are welcomed by SYG.
|