Good job finding more information and bringing the thread back on track.

If the the possible complicity issue is ignored and the Land is infact becoming more valuable it entirly makes sense to get Bundy off the Publilc Land.
Think of it as Public Housing and Bundy is supposed to be payiny rent on a House. The amount he is supppsed to pay is low so you don't activly presue eviciton.
Now the Land the Housing is on becomes more valuable and you can get more rent for it from People who are going to actually pay and you decide to start activly presuing the eviction.

The complicity of the Senator owning some of the Land in an area where the Land may be going up in value may or may not be foul depending on how long the Land has been owned by the Senator and what political things were done and by whom to get cause that particular area to suddenly become under development.

__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel