Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 01-08-2016, 08:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,361
what gets me is why they say the engine will not work where a valley mounted turbo is used?they sell them without the intake so it shouldn't matter.just use your old intake.i have never messed with a van 6.5 so can't say just what would be different.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-08-2016, 08:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
I'm pretty sure the angle of the ports on the heads are different on the side mount and valley turbo heads. But you could just run a side mount turbo engine without the turbo as an NA version. Might have to construct an air filter system for it.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-25-2016, 05:09 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
I wised up and stripped the van of useful stuff i added, then sold it to a kid with the problem fully disclosed for cheap. With the body rust it made the most financial sense. He intends to ride out the inspection sticker adding coolant or water i guess.

I then replaced the van with an identical chassis 3500 same year, but powered by a traditional 350 5.7 that is a lot more reliable.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-25-2016, 08:08 AM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
Something I'd wondered before... why not go with an E350 with the 7.3? Too expensive/hard to find?
__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-25-2016, 11:32 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mölyapina View Post
Something I'd wondered before... why not go with an E350 with the 7.3? Too expensive/hard to find?
Local rot preferences.

My experience has been with older domestic work vans, dodge rusts by far and above the worst, ford a distant second, and these express vans are a pretty decent 3rd. Somewhere between dodge and ford are sprinter vans and their awful cosmetic rust issues.

When the express vans do rot they tend to rot along the rockers and where the usual upfitting a-hole drilled holes for shelving when the van was new. Essentially not danger areas. They have other weaknesses like hinges and door handles, but those can be repaired and replaced easier than major rust.

The fords in the same price range see more structural rot, body mounts, frame issues, ect.

Of course there are no hard and fast rules and each van must be considered as an individual based on use, but thats been my general impression in the under 3 grand 15 year old beat up van market. I looked at several 7.3s with horrendous bodies that owners were holding out a high price on.

Also on a purely utility standpoint, i like the express rear barn doors. Now having said all that, the econoline extended body has a much better turning radius, and i would have jumped on a sufficiently decent body ford for a good price, but already having an express means i have many express body specific widgets for a new van


This concludes more than you ever wanted to know in my selection process for crappy old vans.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-25-2016, 12:31 PM
nate300d's Avatar
What did I just do?
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edgerton OH 43517
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3 View Post
lent my 02 work van to an associate for 2 weeks and 800 miles, and it returned like uncle bucks brougham, emitting an enormous cloud of white smoke at all times. hes not a gauge watcher so oh well.

Burning 1 gallon of coolant in 20 miles. at the age and mileage im considering going 4bt or 6bt instead since the van is good otherwise. Maybe even an older ford 7.3 instead. Something that can take punishment instead of the glass jaw 6.5

anyone have any opinions?
I am not a fan of the Fords with the International/Navistar engines. I have seen so many of those broke down. I remember having a conversation with a Ford mechanic about 12 years ago. All he did was work on those diesels. He stated to me "those engines keep me VERY employed".
__________________
Current:
1985 300D aka Miss Margaret
1991 300SE aka Alarice
1995 SL320 aka Samantha
1997 K1500 Silverado
Past:
1999 E300 ex-wife got it and let her son ruin it
1984 190 2.3 ex-wife got it and let her son destroy a great car
1985 300D (CA version) aka Maybelline lost to deer at high speed.
1981 300D aka Madeline (went to salvage at near 400k) rusty, yet best car I ever drove
Wishlist:
McFarlan TV6 (only a few privately owned)
ReVere with Rochester engine
1917 Premier (only one left)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-25-2016, 06:11 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by nate300d View Post
I am not a fan of the Fords with the International/Navistar engines. I have seen so many of those broke down. I remember having a conversation with a Ford mechanic about 12 years ago. All he did was work on those diesels. He stated to me "those engines keep me VERY employed".
I cant imagine a mechanic having that opinion on the earlier pre and powerstroke engine series. 12 years ago? Maybe early 6.0s he was thinking of.

The 7.3 and 6.9 are about as reliable as an engine can possibly get. Hell, i pulled a bunch of bent and broken push rods out of a 350k 7.3 once and replaced them, and the thing ran fine again. It was amazing
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-26-2016, 09:17 AM
nate300d's Avatar
What did I just do?
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edgerton OH 43517
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3 View Post
I cant imagine a mechanic having that opinion on the earlier pre and powerstroke engine series. 12 years ago? Maybe early 6.0s he was thinking of.

The 7.3 and 6.9 are about as reliable as an engine can possibly get. Hell, i pulled a bunch of bent and broken push rods out of a 350k 7.3 once and replaced them, and the thing ran fine again. It was amazing
I am not certain of the engine size, but it was the Navistar/International engine that he spoke of.

__________________
Current:
1985 300D aka Miss Margaret
1991 300SE aka Alarice
1995 SL320 aka Samantha
1997 K1500 Silverado
Past:
1999 E300 ex-wife got it and let her son ruin it
1984 190 2.3 ex-wife got it and let her son destroy a great car
1985 300D (CA version) aka Maybelline lost to deer at high speed.
1981 300D aka Madeline (went to salvage at near 400k) rusty, yet best car I ever drove
Wishlist:
McFarlan TV6 (only a few privately owned)
ReVere with Rochester engine
1917 Premier (only one left)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page