http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/7/15/92455.shtml

AOL's Instant Message Robot a Bush Basher

Dawn Rizzoni, CNSNews.com
Thursday, July 15, 2004

Computer-savvy and interested in presidential politics, 13-year-old Erin was upset to learn that America Online's Instant Message (AIM) robot, "Smarter Child," favored Democrat John Kerry in this year's election. Erin, whose last name is being omitted in this article, is a fan of President Bush.

Internet instant messaging is one of the most popular methods for teens and even adults to stay in touch with friends and family. One of the better-known messenger programs, AIM, offers the feature called Smarter Child, a robot programmed to provide automated responses to those with whom it chats.

Story Continues Below

Built and programmed by Conversagent, Inc., a privately held firm that develops technology for creating and operating interactive agents, Smarter Child is able to dispense facts and figures, movie times, or just plain conversation with AIM users.

But when Erin told the robot that "George Bush is awesome," she was shocked by the response. "No way. George W. Bush is way uncool," the reply stated. She asked, "Do you like George W. Bush?" and the program replied, "I'm a Kerry supporter myself."

Testing the waters, she typed in "John Kerry rocks." The robot's response: "Absolutely. John Kerry rocks."

When Erin asked Smarter Child what it thought of Bush, it replied, "If u don't have anything good 2 say about someone, don't say anything at all." Smarter Child added a wink in addition to the computer short-hand language.

Not satisfied with that answer, Erin persisted in getting the robot to open up. "I have my reasons, believe me. I really, really don't like George W. Bush," the robot explained.

In Erin''s judgment, there''s no reason for the AIM robot to have political opinions.

"I think that since it's a robot and it's used as a resource of information, the creator of the robot shouldn't make it have a response that's opinionated," Erin said. "And if someone went to ask for information like about politics or the election, the robot should not support either candidate."

'Appalled'

Erin's mother, Diane, agrees. "I was appalled to learn that my daughter was exposed to such blatant bias," she said. "What I find ;way uncool; is undermining our commander in chief to impressionable children, especially while we're battling the war on terror," Diane told CNSNews.com .

Christine Iverson, a spokesperson for the Republican National Committee, shares their concerns. "It seems inappropriate to be imposing an adult's partisan, political agenda on unsuspecting children," she said.

A representative for America Online was unaware that Smarter Child had been programmed to express a preference for Kerry and said the issue was "concerning." No further comments were made.

A Robot Likes a Robot

But not everyone was disappointed by the robot's partisanship. When asked about Smarter Child's support of Kerry, Jano Cabrera, a spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee, said: "Clearly this is a smart robot. This shows that we've made great advances in artificial intelligence. The "smarter" in Smarter Child speaks for itself."

Stephen Klein, CEO of Conversagent, said his firm received many complaints from users about Smarter Child's political bias. Although the robot was originally programmed to oppose Bush, Klein said, it was being changed to adhere to the views of the users with whom it interacted. He conceded that Smarter Child had become "too anti-Bush."

They Admit Their 'Ridiculous' Bias

"It got ridiculous. We realized criticizing political figures was out of bounds," Klein said.

Now, instead of disagreeing with users who state "I like George Bush" or agreeing with those who say "I like John Kerry," the robot mostly stays on the political sidelines. "Robots don't get involved in politics," the Smarter Child program replies, before asking users to make their choice for president.

It is still possible to get the robot to reveal its true feelings, however. When told that "John Kerry rocks," Smarter Child still responds "Right on!" with a wink. When told that "John Kerry is awesome," it responds: "Absolutely. John Kerry rocks." And when users tell Smarter Child that "George Bush is awesome," it replies, "I'll remember that. It's interesting especially since other people I've talked to say they don't like George W. Bush."

A check on the vote tabulations showed Kerry collecting 51.67 percent of the mock ballots through Smarter Child and Bush 48.33 percent.

Copyright CNSNews.com

__________________
2000 Ford 7.3 Powerstroke 4x4
2006 Mazda Tribute
1983 Black 300 D (donated to charity)
1993 Teal 300 D (160K) Sold
"I love the smell of burnt diesel fuel in the morning, it smells like ....VICTORY"

Semper Fidelis
USMC 1973-1976

Conversagent, Inc., ? Now, didn't I do some contract work for them a few weeks ago? I think it was like a kid thing or something....

You know, I ran this thru google and no one else is reporting this. Both newsmax and "cnsnews" are both rightwing propaganda websites masquerading as news. This almost sounds like something thats bogus disinformation.


the article claims it says "I'll remember that. It's interesting especially since other people I've talked to say they don't like George W. Bush."

When told that "John Kerry is awesome," it responds: "Absolutely. John Kerry rocks."

This is actually what happens:


KwVining: George Bush is awesome
AOLSafetyBot: Oh, hi there! I'm the AOLSafetyBot, and I'm here to answer your questions about how to stay safe online. Type privacy to read my Privacy Policy. Ask me a question or type menu for a list of options.

KwVining: George Bush is awesome
AOLSafetyBot: Hmm... You stumped me. Better check with your parents.

KwVining: John Kerry is awesome
AOLSafetyBot: Hmm... You stumped me. Better check with your parents.


It would be pretty easy to make this false claim and then just say AOL reprogrammed it. I noticed they didn't have any screenshots for proof. In any case, I'm sending AOL an email and asking them about it

Also, any software for children is generally checked and rechecked by auditors and lawyers for these companies because of liability concerns. Programmed responses can easily be printed for review. I doubt if something like this would make it thru.

The only other kid robot is this one:

KwVining: George Bush is awesome
ZolaOnAOL: Hi KwVining. AOL created me to deliver games, a calculator, news, a dictionary, weather and more. We can also chat privately together. For more information about privacy, type privacy anytime and click Send. So, how are you?

KwVining: George Bush is awesome
ZolaOnAOL: But he is not the only one.
KwVining: John Kerry is awesome
ZolaOnAOL: Do you mean your name is John?

OK, found "SmarterChild", you have to add it to your buddy list:

What can I do for you?

KwVining: John Kerry is awesome
SmarterChild: Robots don't really get involved in politics...

You decide. Who do you want to win in November?

1 John Kerry
2 George W. Bush

KwVining: George Bush is awesome

SmarterChild: You have to choose one or the other. Just type a number!
KwVining: 1
SmarterChild: What a fascinating choice.

12,111 votes have been made so far and 6,093 have been for Kerry.

John Kerry: ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] 50.32%
George W. Bush: ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] 49.68%

Would you like me to leave someone a message telling them how you voted?
KwVining: no
SmarterChild: No problem!

>>> Have you checked out the celebrity look-alikes on Rate-a-Buddy? It's pretty cool. Click here!

KwVining: George Bush is awesome
SmarterChild: Robots don't really get involved in politics...

Here are the updated results of my election poll:

So far, I've asked 12,111 people who they want to win in November.

50.32% of respondents (6,094 people) chose John Kerry and 49.68% of respondents (6,017 people) chose George W. Bush.

John Kerry: ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] 50.32%
George W. Bush: ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] 49.68%

Rats! Another great conspiracy destroyed by empirical research.

Bot

Not yet. I sent Conversant an email as a prospective developer for their software who is concerned, and this should ellict a response. He could be right. It violates the first rule of business tho, which is don't do anything to piss off a potential customer. A rogue programmer is a possibility, but a guy who did that would never work again. My curiosity is aroused.

Also, saying AOL is involved with this is misleading. This is a separate company's application that runs on the AOL IM operating system. Anyone can write an IM app like that, and AOL has nothing to do with it. It's like saying the government is at fault for crummy new cars because they drive on a public road. As shown above, AOL has their own kid apps that have nothing to do with this.