Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog Tech Info Tech Forums
  Search our site:    
 Cart  | Project List | Order Status | Help    

Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum > Technical Information and Support > Tech Help

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2000, 10:11 PM
Mike Murrell's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,141
In a 3/19/2000 post, Steve Brotherton talked about "petrified chain rails" being a predominant cause of chain failure in the
3.5/4.5, 3.8/5.0, 4.2/5.6 MB V8s

Looking through an IMPCO parts catalog, I see that M103 motors are equipped with what they call "Chain Rail Clamping Lever" and 2 "Chain Guides".

Everything wears out sooner or later; are the M103 motors susceptible to the problem that the V8s are? Thanks for your time.

Mike Murrell
'91 300-SEL
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 07:00 AM
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gainesville FL
Posts: 6,844
The statement I made was based on hundreds of repaired chain failures in V8s. The only other motor we have seen more than "ONE" failure are the 615/616/617 motors where we have seen maybe 20-30 over 25 years.

I have seen a couple 16v 190's fail and sold parts to someone doing a 103 motor that failed, but it is NOT a common occurance. We are currently doing no preventative measures on 102/103 motors. That might be reconsidered as the fleet gets over 200k. We advise upper chain rails (three only) on all the V8's at 75k intervals and chains at 150k.

All the motors that have no problems, use ratcheting chain tentioners. The problem with the rails is that they become brittle over time and there is no way to prevent the wimpy hydraulic tentioner (on V8s - no ratchet) from occationally loosing oil pressure after sitting (which rattles the chain hitting these rails which otherwise never contact the chain).
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 07:01 AM
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tucker, Ga USA
Posts: 12,153
Yes there are plastic rails in most Benz motors, BUT they have different style chain tensoiners that don't allow chain SLAP! Of course on major overhaul they should be replaced. The M119 engines are going to be simular to M116/117 in failure due to simular tensioners. If you hear any rattle have it checked out!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 08:01 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Suwanee, GA, USA
Posts: 4,712
To add. We don't see the 103's fail..I have yet to replace the chain in one.

I have seen over a hundred of the V-8's fail. (116)

I have seen more than a dozen of the 119's fail.

All was a result of BAD MAINTENANCE!!!!!!! And a customer who did not listen to their car.

Donnie Drummonds
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Timing chain guide rails - WHY replace these? Tomguy Vintage Mercedes 26 02-19-2008 11:18 AM
timing chain rails - is it enough? rsmcmahon Tech Help 4 10-29-2003 11:39 AM
OM603 timing chain installation report gsxr Diesel Discussion 3 08-15-2003 11:00 AM
560 SEL Rocker Arm Removal hbofinger Tech Help 10 07-23-2003 02:28 PM
87 300E with 296k miles-need new chain rails? lizem100 Tech Help 1 01-23-2002 12:35 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2011 Pelican Parts - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page